Zakir Naik :Misinterpreting Ala Hazrat’s (R.A) Fatwa

31 Jan


Author Icon  Group Icon
Muhammad Mobasher Muhammadi
Senior Member

Posts: 3373
Joined: 10/20/2005
I would like to bring this to the attention of everyone as it is very important.Dr. Zakir Naik’s website had the following article published defending his views pertaining yazeed paleed:Clarification of Dr.Zakir Naik’s Statement on Yazeed

It is written by Mr. Manzoor Shaikh, administration manager (of the organisation, I suppose).

He goes on to say:

”5. As far as the Ahl-e-sunnat-wal-Jamaat is concerned, inspite of the difference of opinion it is agreed upon that it is permissible to say “May Allah have mercy on him” or “May Allah be pleased with him” for Yazeed. Therefore saying “May Allah be pleased with him” after Yazeed’s name is not Haraam, nor a sin and is not wrong.”

He then provides references of the Fatwas from different Dar-ul-ulooms (listed below) and their image files can be downloaded from here.

He says:

“This has been reconfirmed recently in writing from various Darul Ulooms and Islamic Organisations in India.

Fatawas to clarify and support the above stand.
a) Darul Uloom, *****.
b) Nadwatul Ulema, Lucknow (verbally confirmed on phone, written copy to be received)
c) Darul Uloom, *****.
d) Jamaat-e-Islami-i-Hind, New Delhi. (verbally confirmed on phone, written copy to be received)
e) Darul Uloom Ahmadia Salfia, Darbhanga, Bihar.
f) Jamiatul-Ahle-Hadith, New Delhi
g) Aligarh Muslim University
h) Ahmed Raza Khan *****
i) And several others who have confirmed on phone and are expected to be received in the next couple of days.

Fatawas from scholars outside India:
1) Shaikh Abdullah Ibn Jibreen (on audio, written copy to be received)
2) Shaikh al Islam Ibn Taymiyah”

It is a blatant lie and has not been confirmed by the Dar-ul-Ifta of Bareilly Shareef.

When you view the first file here:  http://img156.imageshack.us/my.php?image=barelieg8.jpg

You will clearly read on the 5th line, it says:

“Yazeed Kay Liye Mazkoorah Jumlay Isti’maal karna na jaa’iz-o-haraam hai”

To use the aforementioned sentences for Yazeed is Haraam and impermissible.

i.e. “Radi Allahu Ta’ala Anhu” and “Rahmatullahi ‘Alayhim”The second Fatwa file is an edited version of the first file and only the last paragraph of the first file has been irrelevantly represented as the opinion of the Aa’lahazrat or Dar-ul-Ifta. You can view it here:http://img142.imageshack.us/my.php?image=summaryoffatawas2xr4.gif

Mr. Manzoor Shaikh, either by ignorance or deliberately, have availed the liberty of misrepresenting Aa’lahazrat’s opinion and of Dar-ul-Ifta’s by saying:

“This has been reconfirmed recently in writing from various Darul Ulooms and Islamic Organisations in India” ..whereas the complete opposite has been expressed in the Fatwa from Dar-ul-Iftah. ————————-

 

See Also-

Salafi Saudi and Jews

Sunni Muslim demanded Ban on Zakir Naik

Indian Muslims from Bihar state protested against Zakir Naik

About these ads

349 Responses to “Zakir Naik :Misinterpreting Ala Hazrat’s (R.A) Fatwa”

  1. indian matrimonials February 2, 2008 at 9:42 am #

    really nice one and keep it up!

    http://www.indiamatrimony.com for indian matrimonials

  2. Ali Akbar February 6, 2008 at 6:17 pm #

    HIDDEN AGENDA OF THE ISNA ASHARI SHIAS
    Shias challenge for debate with Dr. Zakir Naik accepted,
    But “A canon is not required to kill a rat”

    A week before Muharram, the Muslim community experienced the pain of the onslaught of accusations on their favourite Islamic scholar Dr. Zakir Naik. Why are Some of the Shias desperate to malign Dr. Zakir Naik? What makes them so jealous of a Scholar whom even the Christians and the Hindus do not mind agreeing with? The reason is simple and straightforward.

    Dr. Zakir Naik is bonding the Muslims community together with the unbreakable bond “The Holy Qur’an”.
    . In fact Dr. Zakir Naik’s wise reasoning strengthened from authentic sources caused scores of educated Muslims as well as Shias from Khoja Isna Sahara Jamaat, Dawoodi Bohras and others to enter into the mainstream of Islam. i.e. follow The Qur’an and Sunnah of prophet Muhammad {pbuh}.

    Dr. Zakir Naik has inspired hundred of Muslims to take up Daw’ah as their chosen and passionate profession and many of them are running their own Da’wah centers across the world.

    No contemporary Muslim scholar has appealed to the masses of all Muslim sects with such a brotherly impact as Dr. Zakir Naik has managed to do. The impact was such that the conference on ‘peace –the solution of humanity’ organized by IRF saw hundreds of Shias visiting the venue every day and leaving with impressions of satisfaction. This was also evident by their presence in large number as seen by all watching the live telecast of the event. Those Shias who have always worked to create ‘fitnah’ and destroy the unity amongst Muslims could not tolerate this. Hence they picked up a statement of Dr. Zakir Naik regarding Yazid and hurled it as a weapon manipulated and out of context to achieve their destructive aim.

    Challenging Dr. Naik for a debate
    In a desperately and hurried attempt they also challenged Dr. Zakir Naik for a debate. Many Shias thought that this was a good opportunity to cause a division among the Muslims who were realizing their duty about spreading the message of Islam peacefully. In fact even while Dr. Zakir Naik was on Hajj these mischievous Shias spread the word that Dr. Zakir is not responding to their challenge for debate and tried to show the world that he is trying to run away.
    After much restraint and patience to accusations continue Now Dr Zakir Naik has accepted the challenge and has sent the message to Safdar Karmali, president of the Khoja Isna Ashari jamaat [Mumbai] the main person who spat the venom against the global Da’wah efforts of Dr. Zakir, and sent a letter to him to organize a public debate in Excel ground which happens to be one of the largest in Mumbai. Dr. Zakir is willing to debate personally with Safdar Karmali, president of the Khoja Isna Ashari jamaat [Mumbai] himself or if Safdar Karmali is not willing but is ready to bring any scholar of his choice then any student or associate of Dr. Zakir would be available to debate with them.

    Among other unknown or lesser-known Shias, a person by the name of Zaki Bakri also wishes to derive publicity out of this controversy. Zaki Bakri’s challenge for a debate is also accepted but since we don’t require a cannon to kill a rat hence any student or associate available and selected by Dr.Zakir Naik would be able to debate with Zaki Bakri. Now in order to prove himself he only has to fix a date, hire a hall preferably Excel Hall, London. Dr. Zakir Naik had delivered a talk in Excel Hall, London which has a capacity of more than 25000, due to over whelming response several thousands were denied the opportunity to hear his talk. Thus, Zaki Bakri is challenged he should take a legal permission and we will request Dr. Zakir Naik to send one of his student or an associate to debate Zaki Bakri and expose him.

    This will give them a fair opportunity to condemn Dr Zakir Naik in public and a chance for the Ummah to see the other point of view of the student or associate of Dr. Zakir Naik and decide for themselves who is the real representative and the voice of the Ummah.

    • IMRAN December 26, 2009 at 11:33 am #

      SALAAM
      I THINK NOW IT IS EVIDNT THAT DR ZAKIR NAIK IS A LIAR.
      HE HAS MISQUOTED A FATWA AND HENCE HAS LOST HIS CREDIBILITY.
      MAY ALLAH SHOW HIM THE RIGHT PATH AND SAVE OUR PEOPLE FROM BLINDLY FOLLOWING THE MISQUOTERS

    • syed mahmood ur rahman January 30, 2010 at 4:05 am #

      Janab,

      Jo Rasool e Akram (S.A.W) k Nawase (A.S.) pe zulm karne wale ki himayat kare hum toh usse haraami he kahenge.

      Hum kya yeh toh sab kahenge chahe wo kisi bhi muslak ka ho.

      Allah humma laa’an yazeed (l.a.) and his companions.

      Thanks

    • mohd parvez raza March 8, 2010 at 7:21 am #

      janab….,
      there are lot of muslim in this world but momin only one muslak that is ” baralby”. i think u don’t know taaz-e- sariyat is “Azheri miya”. And u don’t know that allah hazrat (r.a) had have knowledge in 54 field …. so u can think about your zakir naik he is a setaan .

      and in last i would like say that….if your muslak is right than u can prove that ALLHA accept your dua……aap hamare kisi bhi mazar-e- paak par ja kar dekh sakte hain ……dua kase kabool hoti hai….. u and naik companions is nothing…..

      “ISHQ-E-NAVI” ho to ibadat kabool ho barna hazar sazde karo sab fuzol ho .”ISHQ-E-NAVI” dil ko itna safai de dil iena bane to “MADINA” dekhae de…….

      kafir ,or sun
      hamare AKA ke nawase (a.s.)par zulm karne balo ko to main uske moh par thokna tak gabara nahi karonga…..

      • AHMAD ZIYA August 4, 2012 at 11:42 pm #

        Very Good Comment Parvez Raza. Zakir Naik is a Big Shaitan……..Our Maslak(Maslake Alahazrat) is Right. other is wrong.

    • KHan April 26, 2012 at 9:51 am #

      MR. KHALNAYAK HUNCHMAN you even do not know what is haq what else you speak about Islam ignorant illiteate associate of yazid tyrannt your assessment about khalnayak populairty only through drawing audience of other religions this is not unique eve3ry one come to listen why because english language as a tool of attracting other religions nothing improtant but his lectures based on his own negative understand of islam teachings when he approved the yazid as authentic then he loses all his stature and beleive he completely digverted people from HAQ so it is simple that his behaviour is unislamic infedels stop paraising theis partner of satin and come to the fold of turth and HAQ

  3. Naushad February 8, 2008 at 4:45 pm #

    It is important for we Muslims to know the real faith of Shias & not get influenced by them in dividing our community. We Muslims may have differences on certain aspects of belief but ultimately we are one. Read the following & decide for your self:
    Is Shia Muslim? Decide Yourself!!!

    Please visit the Reference Section if you wish to view the original scanned images of the following Shia references.
    URL: (http://www.kr-hcy.com/references/shia/index.shtml)
    001. Neither we accept such Lord nor do we accept the Prophet of such Lord whose Caliph is Abu-Bakr (r.a) (Na’uzubillah). [Anwaar-ul-Na’umania, Vol#2, Pg#278 – Published Iran]
    002. None of the Prophets (a.s) had been bestowed with the Prophet Hood until He declared His belief in the fallacy character of ALLAH (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#1, Pg#265 – Published Iran]
    003. Disclaimer to the doctrines that fate, benediction and vice belong to ALLAH (Na’uzubillah). [Usool-ul-Kaafi, Vol#1, Pg#293 – Published Iran]
    004. The fourteen innocents (Ma’sumeen) are incomparable and unprecedented like ALLAH. (Na’uzubillah) [Chouda Sitaray, Pg#2 – Published Lahore]
    005. There is no difference between ALLAH and Ali (r.a) such as in the virtues for; The master of Khatim-e-Suleman, The Master of Doomsday, The master of Siraat (The Bridge over Hell) and Renaissance Field, The Creator of leaves on the trees, The one who ripens the fruits, The one who continued fountains, The one who made drift in the canals (Na’uzubillah). [Jila-ul-A’yoon, Vol#2, Pg#85 – Published Lahore]

  4. Haider February 10, 2008 at 9:35 pm #

    Dr. Zakir naik by his reply that any of his associate or students can accept the challenge of the dialoge with Zaki baqri is like if he is hiding behind a clock. this shows that he has no courage to stand in front of zaki baqri and he simply knows that he cannot face and beat zaki baqri in the dailogue so he wants his student to face him so if his student is defeated the feelings of shame will be much less than that if he himself is defeated.
    if i say in urdu then it will be right to say mudaiee sust gwah chusth because ali akabr as his advocate is giving more foolish arguments than the zakir naik or his associate may do.

    • HANIF KAZI August 3, 2009 at 2:35 pm #

      as sallam walai kum my brother i appreciate with your opinion about Dr Zakir naik i too respect him for his dedication towards propagating islam and its clear and authentic view to common people brother i now this rabbzi (shia) very well they are dangerous than jews real enemy off islam no matter allah knows better inshallah we too have to give our friends knowldge of islam as its the right of every muslim may allah fullfill your wishes and give u good health sallam to all in your family

      ALLAH HAFIZ

      REGARDS
      HANIF

    • Ikrema Idrees March 18, 2010 at 6:43 pm #

      Dear Brother! what difference does it make if Dr. Zakir wants some of his students to have a debate with the Shiaa aalim? May be in this particular field his student has specialized and has more knowledge than dr.Zakir himself. To me, it sounds positive that instead of keeping himself in front on every ground he’s actually giving his students a chance and opportunity to share their knowledge with others.

  5. Imran February 10, 2008 at 9:38 pm #

    it is not as killing a rat with a cannon
    .
    if i say it rightly then it will be so
    a rat running from a cannon and sending a worm istead of him in front of a cannon
    how is that

  6. Najeebullah Shah February 13, 2008 at 5:54 am #

    Salam,
    Zakir Bhai is one of the prominent scholars of Islam. He might have some solid points about his statement. So let him convince in his own style. Don’t criticize him. Please take care of his services to Islam if not him. How can we spread Islam, if we starting directing our fingers on our own people.

  7. Abu Bakr Azmi February 25, 2008 at 5:19 am #

    No doubt Dr Zakir Naik is an scholar of repute, but no scholarship is higher than Islam.
    Dr Zakir Naik, had defended the indefendable, there is his waterloo.

    Abu Bakr Azmi

    • musalmaan January 7, 2010 at 10:24 am #

      No body other than Allah (ST) how much his or her ranks and positions are high whether a Prophet or His sahabis or qutub or wali sufi or Ali(R.A) is equal or higher than Allah the lord of the worlds.

  8. urazzaq12 March 5, 2008 at 7:58 am #

    Everyone should appreciate dr. naiks knowledge of comparative religions and his efforts to refute false claims of people of other religions. But you can’t regard him as a scholar, and I am even he doesn’t consider himself to be one.

  9. urazzaq12 March 5, 2008 at 7:59 am #

    and I am sure* even he doesn’t consider himself to be one.

  10. 110 March 14, 2008 at 12:00 am #

    why are you lot making this propaganda about shia’s splitting up islam.

  11. aisha sami March 15, 2008 at 1:12 pm #

    Dr.Zakir Naik is a very good islamic speaker,it is because of him that many muslims are realising their duty of propagating islam .He is one of the few scholars who have a command over not only Islam but also other comparative religions.I don’t know why there is a hue and cry among people about his Aqeedah and all.I think that many people are jealous of him and that is the reason they are trying to malign him.

    • pasha July 9, 2011 at 3:25 am #

      its not just good enough to have a great scholar , he should be first respect our nabi and sahaba and buzurgane deen but dis fellow is crossing his limits.

    • KHan April 26, 2012 at 9:58 am #

      dr. khalnayak taking muslim ummah to hell fire will you accept ok follow him we are not jealous but when he speaks in fvour batil then all his work and efforts burnt in the well of hell so study what is HAQ and BATIL

  12. imran March 17, 2008 at 10:15 am #

    assalamwaillukum
    i always support dr.zakir naik and will continue doing that without any hesitation. he in man of honour one must respect his contrbution toward islam and humanity.its shame on us that still we are playing politics in our religion.
    I APPEAL EVERYONE TO SUPPORT DR.ZAKIR NAIK

  13. Imran Ahmed, karachi, Pakistan March 17, 2008 at 9:00 pm #

    Dr.Zakir Naik is the one of the greatest Islamic scholar that people have ever seen but the shias will se No he is not so I want you ask these scholar who are challenging Dr.Zakir. where were they when Dr.William campbell wrote his book stating that Quran has several scientific errors does it was not necesary that time to clarify the false charge by William Campbell or not, approximately 8 years later in 2000 by the grace of ALLAH (S.W.T) Zakir Naik went all away to chicago and clear all the false charge against Quran and not only Willian Campbell he has also refuted all allegations against Islam by other christian scholars. How many people have understand the Quran like him i.e the Quran repeatedly talks about jews and christian that they do wrong things like worshiping the calf and to christian that the say Jesus Christ (P.B.U.H)is God but how many Muslim scholars have ask them about these things. Quran says..
    in Surah Maryam Chapter:19.Verse:88-92 They say: “(Allah) Most Gracious has begotten a son!” Chapter19.V:89 Indeed ye have put forth a thing most monstrous!
    Chapter19.V:90 At it the skies are ready to burst, the earth to split asunder, and the mountains to fall down in utter ruin,

    Here ALLAH says that christian are abusing ALLAH by saying that ALLAH has a son but who cares, I want to ask you people does these so called scholars who tries to challenge Zakir Naik have ever read these verses yes surely they have read so why don’t they ask the christian about these statement NOTHING is greater than abusing ALLAH (S.W.T) which the christians are doing but these scholar does’t challenge them to debate on this matter. They have no guts to debate with the christian missionary if so they have debated only the great Zakir Naik have guts to debate them and clarify the misconception abou Islam. The person who is propagating Islam to his full ability is Zakir Naik today show me any body in this whole Muslim world today that is closer to promoting Islam like him.

  14. Sher-e-Ghousia March 18, 2008 at 3:14 am #

    Nice post. Just so people think that we are not telling the truth, it would have been good to take a screen print of the page before Zakir Naiks followers changed it.

    • Ikrema Idrees March 18, 2010 at 6:59 pm #

      It may look a nice post to u but Is it doing any good to Islam? What is the matter with u Bareilvi Muslims? How can u be so jealous of another Muslim who already has done a lot for the DEEN of Prophet Muhammad(SAW). I also don’t agree with dr.zakir naik regarding what he said about Yazeed, but Is it really such a big sin that we in an instance forget all the good he has done for Islam and Muslim Ummah?
      Aap saarey Bareilvi log or aap k Aalim uss waqat kahan chaley jatey ho jab christians or yahoodi Islam aur humarey NABEE Prophet Muhammad (SAW) k baarey mein bakwaas kartey hein aur Qur’an mein errors nikaltey hein aur dr.zakir un sub ka jawab detey hein. kya un key in kamon ki waja se jealous ho tum log.
      Tum logon k is attitude ki waja se non muslim is naa ittifaaqi ka faaida uthaa rahey hein aur tum logo ko apni hi parri hui hey. dr.zakir k yazeed k baarey mein yeh comments deney se ALHUMDULILLA Islam ka koi nuqsaan nahi hua. kuch hosh key naakhun lo aur ye dekho k hum Musalmano ko iss waqat kitni ittihad ki zaroorat hey aur ye hum kya kar rahey hein

      • Shahnawaz warsi March 22, 2010 at 5:14 pm #

        yes that is really a big sin..Insulting AhleBait is really great sin…

      • mohd danish raza October 24, 2010 at 4:56 pm #

        aap ko ye achi tarah se maloom hona chahiye ki barelvi jo bhi kaam kahte hai ya karte hai wo sarkare madina ki batai hui sunnat aur kuran, hadees ke saath chalte hai. nabi aur uske ahle khandaan walo ke bare kuch bhi bura kahta to wo kufra ki baat kahta hai.yani uska koi imaan nahi hai .toaise iman walo ko ham kafir kahen ge.jisne nabi se muhhabat ki aur uske wasile se mahabbat ki allah use jannat naseeb karega ameen..so plz ham barelvi allah aur uske rasool par iman sakthi ke saath rakthe hai.rahi baat yahoodi aur isaiyoon to aap se itltiza ki ala hazrat ke likhi hui kityaabo ko aik baar jaroor padhe.(sawanehe ala hazrat)….

      • rania November 23, 2011 at 3:08 pm #

        a muslim cant be a muslim till he loves the prophet and yazeed killed his grand son , ahle bait. hw can u send blessings on him???

      • KHan April 26, 2012 at 10:02 am #

        AISE GUMARH SCHOLARS KI ISLAM MEIN KOI JAGAH NAHIN JO BATIL KA SAAT DETA HAI AUR HAQ SE LOGAON KO DOOR KARTA HA WA RE WA AAP LOG KO KYA HOGAYA KAUNSE RAASTE PAR JA RAHEIN HO JAHAN ANDHERA HI ANDHERA HAI YEHUDI SE BHI GAYA GUZRA BANGAYA MULHEED LAANATI

      • KHan April 26, 2012 at 10:05 am #

        PAHLE NUKSAN TUHAMARA HOGA JAB TUM BATIL KI RASSI THAM KE YUM AL HISSAB KE DIN RUSWA HONGE DEMAK KHARAB TO NAHIN HAI GUMRAHI

      • ziad September 6, 2012 at 3:29 am #

        Hey bro we are not jealous of his work which is useless , but it comes about Christians critisizing our nabi S A W, they are non muslim and have no imaan but when you are muslim claim to be someone respected and on the other hand disrespect the Nabi and hia Ahle Bait is more worst than those kafirs.

      • Sunni City July 20, 2013 at 3:23 pm #
  • Shahid March 25, 2008 at 9:17 am #

    ASALAAM ALAIKUM

    I Love Dr.zakir naik and i wish him paradise and much more success, he is the one who aware the humanity about the true picture of Islam he is the one who convinced people toward Islam why are these people striving to Answer dr.zakir naik rather than answering non Muslims’ mistakes and Questions why they are bringing politics Between Religion why they are arrogant …. Plz respect dr.zakir naik and Spread his lectures in the whole of Humanity than we will be present to mankind in true picture..

    As Brother Imran Ahmed Said

    Dr.Zakir Naik is the one of the greatest Islamic scholar that people have ever seen but the shias will se No he is not so I want you ask these scholar who are challenging Dr.Zakir. where were they when Dr.William campbell wrote his book stating that Quran has several scientific errors does it was not necesary that time to clarify the false charge by William Campbell or not, approximately 8 years later in 2000 by the grace of ALLAH (S.W.T) Zakir Naik went all away to chicago and clear all the false charge against Quran and not only Willian Campbell he has also refuted all allegations against Islam by other christian scholars.

    He is true i thank him for his clarification on Dr.zakir naik i want to ask which one among the Muslim ummah raised up beside Dr.zakir naik to defend Islam and to answer their Questions yet dr.zakir naik don’t take his self to be the highest person among Muslim ummah but in reality he is the owner of Respect and to be called the best teacher of Religions.

    Brother IMRAN AHMED also stated that

    Here ALLAH says that christian are abusing ALLAH by saying that ALLAH has a son but who cares, I want to ask you people does these so called scholars who tries to challenge Zakir Naik have ever read these verses yes surely they have read so why don’t they ask the christian about these statement NOTHING is greater than abusing ALLAH (S.W.T) which the christians are doing but these scholar does’t challenge them to debate on this matter. They have no guts to debate with the christian missionary if so they have debated only the great Zakir Naik have guts to debate them and clarify the misconception abou Islam. The person who is propagating Islam to his full ability is Zakir Naik today show me any body in this whole Muslim world today that is closer to promoting Islam like him.

    Very nice very good questions from them I ask you Imran Bahi to Go to the website http://www.n-islam.com there are so many people giving comments on this issue add your comments there and aware them of dr.zakir naik in the last i am asking the Whole Muslim Ummah

    WHICH ONE AMONG US HAS LAUNCHED AN ISLAMIC CHANNEL THE CHANNEL WHICH HAS 24 HOURS DAWAH LECTURES AND PROGRAMS YOU SHOW ME ANY BESIDE PEACE TV WHICH ONE ……………………………

    KEEP THE BALL ROLLING DR.ZAKIR NAIK IF WE ARE NOT SUPPORTING YOU ALLAH (S.W.T) IS SUPPORTING YOU AND HE IS THE ONE WHO WILL HELP YOU IN EVERY DIFFICULTY

    W.S

    • M NAWAZ November 26, 2013 at 7:28 am #

      All Naiyak fans Please answer this: Is Mr. Khalnaik more knowledgeable than Shaitan e Malooon? Definitely NO, then If you respect Naiyak, you need to respect Shaitan manifold. Then you become Shaitan ke parokar.
      Secondly, regarding Yazeed, You know all praise their forefathers. If naiyak is so praising Yazeed, that means he from yazeed blood.

  • Majid Hussain April 7, 2008 at 6:30 pm #

    Salam I`m a big fan of Dr. Zakir Naik, he has done some amazing work, may Allah reward him and his family in this life and the next, he did make a big mistake about the whole Yazeed thing, but heze only human, so relax heze doing a great job, im sure you have all made mistakes in life, alot worse mistakes then Dr. Zakir Naik, lets not be divided.

  • Sher-e-Ghousia April 13, 2008 at 2:55 pm #

    Just look at how deceptive these Zakir Naik fans (probably Salafis) are. They are turning this whole issue into a Sunni VS Shia thing in order to turn the focus away from Mr Naik. We know the Shia have some corrupt beliefs, but this has nothing to with them. It’s about a self learned scholar who is too arrogant to admit his mistakes.

    Lets ask his supporters a simple question:

    – If your Father got murdered by someone
    – Your friend praises the murderer repeatedly,
    – When you confront your friend, he still keeps praising the murderer by saying it was a mistake and ‘may Allah be pleased with him’
    – Your friend is proud of his insulting statements towards your dad

    Will you still be friends with him even though he repeatedly insults your dad by praising your dads murderer?

    Simply put, you are either with Imam Hussain (Radi Allahu Anh) or Yazid and his Lawyer, Dr Zakir Naik.

    PS: There great people like Pir AlaUddin Siddique who have opened an international Islamic channel. Also, look at how many people the brothers at Dawat-e-Islami have brought towards Islam. I can go on, but I’m sure you get the point.

  • Sher-e-Ghousia April 13, 2008 at 3:02 pm #

    There is a big difference between making a mistake and Insulting the Grandson of the Prophet (SallAllahu alayhi wassalam). If he really is such a great scholar (as his fans suggest) then his comments are even more insulting, because as a scholar he was fully aware of what he was saying. Wether one is an uneducated person and an educated person in Islam, makes a big difference.

  • Imran Ahmed, Karachi, Pakistan April 13, 2008 at 5:59 pm #

    Ye sure I got your point but U R NOT GETTING IT,

    ANSWER TO YOUR QUESTION

    I will definitley blame the person who killed my father similarly I also condem the person who actually killed Imam Hussain (R.A) and it was not Yazid bcoz Yazid was not present at that time.

    “if someone send me to talk to a (third) person but rather talking I kill that (third) person the blame only goes to me not to the (first) person who has sent me”. Simlarly Yazeed did’t ordered the killing of Hussain (R.A) and his family so the blames only goes to the person who actually killed Hussain (R.A) and his family, the history is not one sided i.e All the historical books does’t speak about Yazeed responsible for the killing of Hussain (R.A). It is only the shia potraits it like that.

    and for ur statement that we r deceiving people by turning this issue to Sunni VS Shia,

    The Point is that we r informing the people, that the people who r condeming Zakir Naik what they beleive in i.e What majority of them belief in, I am not talking about corrupt belief of some shias I am talking about what the shias as a whole believe (Including shai scholars) i.e

    1.Ya ALi Madad (Nauzobillah)

    INTERCESSION OF ANY BODY IS HARAM IN ISLAM (SURAH FATIHA Ch.1:Verse:5) “Thee do we worship, and Thine aid we seek”. and in (SURAH BAQARA Ch.2:Verse:48) “Then guard yourselves against a day when one soul shall not avail another nor shall INTERCESSION be accepted for her, nor shall compensation be taken from her, nor shall anyone be helped (from outside)”.

    2.Quran has been corrupt (Nauzobillah)

    Allah says in the Quran..
    Surah Al-Hijir Ch.15:Verse:9 “We have, without doubt, sent down the Message; and We will assuredly guard it (from corruption)”.

    not to mention Mut’a (Temporary Marriage) etc..

    We r telling the masses that if the shias have such beliefs that they cannot understand or follow what is written in the Quran and Sahih hadith so what can we expect from them when they r talking about history.

  • Sher-e-Ghousia April 14, 2008 at 1:04 pm #

    These two solid references from great Islamic figures should prove to you who Yazid was:

    – The great Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal (Radi Allahu Anh) was asked by his son that a group of people (qawm) attribute us to [be with] yazid , he replied, O son! Whoever believes in Allah, how can they have any association with yazid? and why should he not be cursed (laanat) when Allah sends laanat on him in his Book. He asked where did Allah send laanat on him in his Book? The Imam replied “in this saying of Allah Ta’la”:

    Do you then have the sign that if you get the authority, spread disorder in the land and sever your ties of Kinship? These are they whom Allah has cursed and made them deaf from the truth and made their eyes blind. (47:22-23), and then says, is there any greater fasad than the murdering of Husayn?

    Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal is from the mujtahid Imams, muqallad of the Hanabali madhab who lived from 164-241 AH.

    (Mentioned in multiple sources such as Ibn Hajar Makki in al-Sawa’iq al-Muhriqa page 333, Tafsir Mazhari v. 8. p. 434 Imam Barzanji in al-Isha’at, Qadi Abu Ya’la in Mu’tamad al-Usool, ibn al-Jawzi and so on)

    – Imam Jalal Uddin Suyuti mentions in his book ‘The History of the Rightly Guided Caliphs’ (Taarekh ul Khulufaa al-Raashideen); “Nawfal bin Abi al-Faraat said ‘Once I was with Umar bin Abdul Aziz when a man said in his presence ‘Yazid, the leader of the believers’ (Ameer ul Mu’mineen). Umar bin Abdul Aziz said [in shock] ‘Did you call Yazid the Leader of the Believers? Umar then ordered for the man to be lashed 20 times”.

    As you can see, mentioning Yazid’s name with praise is punishable.

  • Sher-e-Ghousia April 14, 2008 at 1:18 pm #

    As I said before, stop turning this into a Sunni Vs Shia issue and turning the limelight away from Dr Naik. We are not talking about the differences in beliefs but the statements of Dr Naik.

    This topic is about Imam Hussain (Radi Allahu Anh) and both Sunni’s and Shia’a love and respect him.

    Who says only Shia’s portray Yazid to be responsible for the killing of Yazid? Have you read the books by the Scholars of the early generations of Islam, such as Imam ibn Hanbal (Radi Allahu Anh)? If you had, then you would have known better?

    I have seen more Sunni Scholars condemning Dr Naik over the Yazid comments than Shia Scholars. So, your logic of it being a Shia thing is baseless.

    I can quote you many references from Sunni Scholars of the past who have accused Yazid of the martyrdom of Imam Hussain (Radi Allahu Anh). May of these scholars even curse Yazid (lanatullah alaih).

    PS: If you want more evidences to the ones above, please ask.

  • Sher-e-Ghousia April 16, 2008 at 12:31 am #

    I just scanned over a few of the comments by the pro-Zakir Naik brigade. Here are a selected few:

    “Don’t criticize him”

    “I think that many people are jealous of him and that is the reason they are trying to malign him”

    “I always support dr.zakir naik and will continue doing that without any hesitation”

    “Dr.Zakir Naik is the one of the greatest Islamic scholar that people have ever seen”

    To all the people who made such ridiculous comments, do you even have a clue? Dr Zakir Naik is not a prophet but a mere human, so he is liable for criticism. Even if someone was my Shaykh, I still wouldn’t say “I always support him and will continue doing that without any hesitation”. That’s against the spirit of the pious Scholars of the past.

    If he makes such an insulting statement, do you want us to stay quiet and let everyone think its okay to say ‘may Allah be pleased with him’ after Yazids name?

    Be honest, how many real Scholars have you people met? If you actually want the places like Syria, Egypt, Yemen and so on, you would recognise instantly what a real Scholar is. Scholars like Shaykh Al Jifri, Shaykh Habib Umar, Shaykh al Yaqoubi, Shaykh Hakim Murad, Shaykh Nuh Keller, etc, have so much knowledge and intelligence that you would consider Dr Naik as a mere student compared to them. Just because someone comes on TV every day, doesn’t make him “great”.

    We should try to think with an open mind and heart.

    Stop trying to portray Dr Naik as invincible. This brother has made an excellent comment:

    “Dr Zakir Naik, had defended the indefendable, there is his waterloo.”

    • afridi August 16, 2011 at 5:50 pm #

      asalaamalaikum frnds zakir nalayaq is the yazid of 21st century

  • ABDULLAH April 16, 2008 at 7:45 am #

    DEAR ALL,
    I AM INVITING YOUR ATTENTIONED TOWARDS MOST FAMOUS AYAT OF QURAN CALLED AYAT-E-THATIR WHICH SHETTE (SHIA) PEOPLE USED TO CLAIM THIER FAKE BELEVES ON AHEL-E-BAIT.

    THIS AYAT IS IN SURA-E-AHJAB PARA 22 CLEARLY FOR WIVES OF RASOOR PBUH AND NOT FOR HAZRAT ALI RA AND THEIR FAMILY.

    IF SOME ONE BELEIF THAT AHEL-E-BAIT IS NOT OTHER THAN “HAZRAT FATIMA RA, ALI RA, HASAN RA AND HUSSAIN RA AND OLAD OF THESE ” THEY DISBELEIVED QURAN BECAUSE ORIGINAL AHEL-E-BAIT AS PER QURAN IS WIVES OF HAZRAT MUHAMMAD PBUH YOU MAY READ SUCH SURAH FROM QURAN.

    YOU MAY REALISED THAT ABDULLAH BIN SAHAH (JEW) WHO CREATED SHAI FIRQA MAKE THIS AQUEEDA “HUB-E-ALI” OR “HUB-E-AHEL-E-BAIT” BUT GOING THROUGH QURAN AHEL-E-BAIT IS WIVES OF RASOOL PBUH WHICH THEY NOT BELEIVE AND MAKE OTHER AS AHEL-E-BAIT AND DISREGARD QURAN.

    • syed mahmood ur rahman September 9, 2011 at 7:25 pm #

      haa bhai bade dino baad yaha hua….bhatke hue log hai…..suno bhai aaap jis ayat ka hawala de rahe ho…..usko aapna khudse samjhe balke jo arabi zaban me maharat rakhta hoo usse malooom karye ke jo ayah e tatheer hai wo jis andaaz se Quran me hai aur jaha azwaaj ka zikr hai… as per the correct arabic grammar yeh hona chahiye ya nahi…sab pata chalega….Waise bhi quran uthra tha suro me use jama kiya kis ne ye sabko pata. hai.

    • Ummate mohammadi November 8, 2012 at 3:48 am #

      Assalamu alaikum brother nice post

  • Imran Ahmed, Karachi, Pakistan April 16, 2008 at 2:49 pm #

    We know that Zakir Naik is a human being, we don’t understand Islam like the shias do (i.e making human part of GOD).

    ..and for your statement that how many scholars have you met (same to u),

    (Answer) If any scholar teaches from Quran and Sahih hadith he is a true scholar who ever he may be, If a scholar says something about Islam for e.g “Interest is HARAM in ISLAM” WITHOUT GIVING REFERENCE Its has ZERO value even he happened to be the BIGGEST SCHOLAR. But if an ordinary human says that it is mention in Surah Baqarah Ch.2 Verse:278-279 that “Interest is HARAM in ISLAM” it has weightage and becomes authentic itself. Similarly any scholar who speaks about Islam it should be backedup by Quran and Sahih Hadith and that is why we respect and support Zakir Naik that while delivering his lecture he always give references from various religious scriptures. Can you name me anybody in this whole Muslim World who gives references of only Quran and Sahih Hadith (leave other religious scriptures) while delevering his lecture. Zakir Naik only Quotes the book of ALLAH and the Prophet authentic sayings no more than that and if this makes him not a true scholar of ISLAM so I am clueless who can we call a true scholar of ISLAM.

    If these scholars as you say have more knowledge and intelligence than Zakir Naik so why they don’t defends ISLAM, WHY DID’T THEY DEBATE William Campbell, or any top christian scholar if they have knowledge and intelligence they should not be afraid to debate them. BUT…they don’t, this type of knowledge is “ABSOLUTELY USELESS” not benefiting anybody. we see in the Media that only Zakir Naik TRULY defending ISLAM.

    No one is stopping MUSLIM SCHOLARS to propagate ISLAM ON TV. As you say that there r top scholars more knowlegable than Zakir Naik so they can be easily propogate ISLAM on TV. “If they are TOP SCHOLARS” no muslim TV Channel will refuse them to Propagate ISLAM.

    Zakir Naik is not the only Muslim scholar who comes on TV there are many other muslim scholars who comes on TV. But it is true that they don’t make much IMPACT on the majority on the teaching of ISLAM as Zakir Naik makes that his why he is popular not just that he only comes on TV makes him great..

    “STOP PORTRAYING HAZRAT ALI(RA) AS INVINSIBLE”

    • Ahmed September 3, 2009 at 3:04 pm #

      zakir naik is a doctor in profession he dont have any right to speak about ISLAM .

      • syed mahmood ur rahman September 9, 2011 at 7:26 pm #

        pagal ** hai naik….. yeh pagalo ko pagal bana raha hai aur pagal hai ke aur pagal bante chale jaarahe hai

    • shakir October 10, 2012 at 10:23 am #

      zakir nayak real name is khafir nalayak

  • Sher-e-Ghousia April 16, 2008 at 6:09 pm #

    Firstly, I have met hundred’s of Scholars. So, I know what makes a good Scholar and what doesn’t.

    If you studied some Usul-ul Fiqh you would know that references are nothing without proper understanding. That is why you see Christians quoting Qur’an Ayas and misinterpreting them. I can quote many references, but it doesn’t mean I’m right. For example, who narrated the hadith, what other hadtihs did the narrators narrate, are they a Sahabi, what is the Scholarly level of the narrators, do they have any illnesses that may cause memory loss, is the hadith narrated in other collections, why was the hadith mentioned, during what period did the event in the hadith happen, what do the Fuaqaha say about the hadith, etc.

    Some Scholars consider the sayings of the Prophet (Sall’Allahu alayhi wassalam) to be more important than His (Sall’Allahu alayhi wassalam) actions. Whilst other Scholars consider the actions to be more important that His (Sall’Allahu alayhi wassalam) sayings. As you can see, quoting a reference and fully understanding it are two different things.

    For example, the quote you mentioned about interest means more by mentioning related hadiths. Imam Abu Hanifa and Imam Mohammed Shaybani considered riba between Muslims and between people of non-Muslims states to be allowed because according to a hadith of Rasul’Allah(SalAllaho Alahi WaAlehi Wasalam) it says that there is no Interest in non-Muslim lands. As you can here, there are differences of opinions here. This shows the complexity of hadiths and references.

    Again, if you studied Islam in more depth, you would know that some Scholars quote certain hadiths which show that we SHOULD’NT argue or debate with others. Moulan Rumi is one of the greatest Islamic Scholars, but he refused to argue or debate with anyone.

    When I was mentioning knowledge, I was referring to Islamic and not inter-faith. I will give credit where it’s due and say that Dr Naik is the most knowledgeable person in terms if interfaith, but as an Islamic Scholar, he has a long way to go.

    How can you say the Scholars I mentioned have useless knowledge? Are you saying the knowledge of the Qur’an and the life of the Beloved Nabi (Sall’Allahu alayhi wassalam) is useless knowledge? Just because a Scholar doesn’t come on TV doesn’t make him useless.

    As I have said so many times, you need to understand things before making judgements. Shaykh Habib Al Jifri went to Denmark to talk with the government. Shaykh Hisham Kabbani even went to the white house. We have Shayukhs all around the world making a difference.

    Just read the biography of the late Shaykh Alawi al Maliki. He never came on TV, but more people knew him when he was alive than any other Scholar. This was due to his Scholarly level and intelligence. Over 4 million people attended his Janaza, that’s almost more than the amount that goes the Hajj. He was such a great Scholar that he left behind hundreds of students, and these students of his are amongst the most distinguished Scholars of today.

    Actually from what I’ve seen most people like Dr Naik because he keeps it simple. That is why when people begin to understand better and become more intelligent they begin to understand that Dr Naik is not as great as they thought. I know many people who used to listen to his speeches but know don’t’, and instead listen to the scholars that I have mentioned.

    “STOP PORTRAYING HAZRAT ALI(RA) AS INVINSIBLE”

    If that is directed at me, when did a say that?
    PS: I don’t want to talk about Dr Naik as a person because that’s not for me to judge. The topic is about his comments about Yazid, so let’s try to stick to that. So if you say “Zakir Naik is great” then thats good for you and I’m not going to comment. You know my stance on Dr Naik, so from now on I’m not going to comment on anything regarding him personally.

    The topics about the comment and not the man.

  • Sher-e-Ghousia April 17, 2008 at 11:24 am #

    As expected, more attempts to divert the attention from the comment by Dr Naik.

  • UMERJAN April 18, 2008 at 5:02 am #

    “YAZEED” IS NOT CORE ISSUE BECAUSE AS PER SHIA BELEIVE “YAZEED” AND HIS FATHER “HAZRAT AMEER MAVIYA RA” TRIED TO DISTROY ISLAM DO YOU THINK IT IS TRUE AND MOST OF SUNNI RELIGIOUS LEADER SLIENT ON THE ISSUE OF YAZEED, FOR YOUR INFORMATION IF YOU BELEIVE KARBALA STORY WHICH WRITTEN CENTURIES AFTER KARBALA IS TOTALLY TRUE, I DO NOT AGREE, BECAUSE AFTER SHAHADAT OF HAZRAT HUSSAIN RA YAZEED SAYS “LANAT ON IBN-E-ZIAD WHAT HE DID IF I WAS THERE I WILL NOT DO THIS TO HUSSAIN” ALSO HE ENTERTAIN FAMILY OF HUSSAIN RA AND ALSO THERE WAS NO KHUTBA OF HAZRAT ZAINAB “WHICH SHIA BELEIVE FIRST MAJLIS” AS PER AUTHENTIC HISTORIAN.

  • ALI JAN April 18, 2008 at 5:56 am #

    Dr. ZAKIR NAIK’S KNOWLEDGE IS BETTER THAN US, I THINK WE SHOULD READ ISLAMIC HISTRY AFTER RASOOL PBUH, AFTER THE ASSASINATION OF HAZRAT USMAN RA THIS CONFLICT WAS BEGUN, AND DUE TO THIS WE SAW MANY FIGHTS BETWEEN MUSLIM, LIKE MAA AYESHA RA VS ALI RA (AT WAR OF CEMEL) AND HAZRAT AMEER MAVIYA RA VS ALI RA IN VARIOUS WARS, THESE ALL HAPPENED DUE TO THIS MAN NAMED ABDULLAH BIN SABAH (JEW) WHO MAKE FAKE AQEEDA OF “HUB-E-ALI”

    SO IT IS REQUESTED FIRST READ HISTRY OF THESE FIGHT MOSTLY ASSASINATION OF HAZRAT USMAN RA AND AFTER CRETISIZE SOME ONE.

    PEOPLE LIKE Dr. ZAKIR NAIK TRYING TO BONDING MUSLIM IN ONE FLAG WHAT QURAN SAY “ALLAH KI RASHI KO MAZBOUT PAKRO AUR TAFURKAY MAIN NA PARO” IS THAT AGAINST TRUE SPRIT OF ISLAM DID IN ISLAM NECESSARY TO USE BAD LANGUAGE AGAINST YAZEED NO THIS IS IN SHIA RELIGION AND WE ARE WELL AWARE THAT SHIA IS NON MUSLIM. U SHOULD READ BELEIVE OF SHIA THEY USE BAD LANGUAGE AGAINST KHULFA, SHAHABA, AHEL-E-BAIT (WIVES OF RASOOL PBUH) ULMA-E-HAQ ETC. EVEN THEY ARE GIVEN “GHALIYAN” TO THESE RESPECTABLE PERSONS OF ISLAM, SO, PLEASE RECONSIDER AND MOVE YOUR APPROACH AGAINST THIS MURTID FIRQA AND GIVE HAND TO Dr. ZAKIR NAIK, HE IS DOING WELL.

    I THINK I NEVER SEEN ANY PERSON LIKE Dr. ZAKIR NAIK IN MY LIFE, HE HIFIZ QURAN, BIBLE (ALL KIND) ZABOOR, EVEN HINDU AND BUDHA HOLY BOOK, HE IS MACHINE WHICH WE USED AGAINST NON-MUSLIM AND MURTID FIRQAS.

    PLEASE DO NOT AFRAID SHIA AND ALSO DO ON INFLUSHED BY THEM.

  • Syd May 12, 2008 at 9:08 am #

    Salaamz 2 all,
    no disrespect to everyone here, but of we focus more on making the muslim community one it may be better, rather than accusing the shia’s for dividing the community. THINK!! about it your going round accusing the shia’s of segregating the muslim ummah, what are you guys doing? aren’t you segregating them from the other muslim brothers.

  • Ali Zai` May 17, 2008 at 1:13 pm #

    Salaam to All Muslim Brothers and Sister.

    The true followers of the Prophit (Peace be Upon Him) would never compromise on the Annemies of Ahal-e-Bait. May be with time elapsed since the Incident of Karbala, Yazeed (the photocopy of shaitan) has managed to make a little room in the heart of non-ture-believers currently known as Dr. Zakir Naik and his supports. But if you look back it didnt happen for the first time, otherwise, why would Allah Subahan-o-Talaah would send thousands of messangers? its just to keep the things on the track.

    Dr. Zaik Naik is too small not on ly in terms of appearence but knowledge to even take up the matter. He simply is a data bank and completely lack anaylitical skills.

  • Ali Zai` May 17, 2008 at 1:17 pm #

    Urfi to Mandeesh Zaghoogh Hai Raqeeban..
    Awaz-e-Sagan Kam na kunad rizaq-e-Gada Ra…

  • ZN the MaN May 19, 2008 at 9:33 am #

    Zakir Naik has that amount of knowledge and communication skills (to a lay man) that if your scholar, if they born second, third and forth time they will not be able to come NEARER to it. Tell me what your scholar have done of which u r so proud of “NOOOOTTTTTTHHHHHIIIIIIIINNNNNGGG”.
    When any person says some thing which goes against your bringup teachings of karabala. You people becomes sad and start arguing about it. but when ALLAH says in the Quran in Ch.19:V:88:92 that those who say that Allah have a son they r giving Allah the BIGGEST ABUSE but that does’t hurt you and you don’t argue about it. so shia of u.

    ONLY ZAKIR NAIK HAVE ASK ABOUT THESE STATEMENTS WHICH ALLAH HAVE ASK US TO CONVEY TO CHRISTIANS AND TELL THEM ABOUT THE TRUE PICTURE OF ALLAH OR ONENESS OF ALLAH.

    So he is more following the Quran rather then u people who based there religion on HISTORICAL TEACHING BUT NOT QURAN.

  • Sher-e-Ghousia May 20, 2008 at 5:44 pm #

    ZN the MaN,

    Congratulations! You have just shown everyone how ignorant and naive a person can become by listening to Dr Naiks talks.

  • shajahan May 21, 2008 at 7:20 am #

    What is the relevance of this statement? do you think somebody listen to Dr. Zakir Naik is naive? What is your evidence for it. If he says something from himself discard it. but his words has the support of Quran and sunnah receive it. that is all the Ulamas of the past centuries had done. In islamic point of view somebody is naive and ignorant whom don`t have the knowledge of Quran and sunnah and follow the superstitions of jahiliyya.
    Allah knows best.

  • warsi May 21, 2008 at 2:19 pm #

    He is naive bcoz he has Interpreted Quran and Sunnah according to his Corrupt Mind.his Personal Opinions and Views have no relevancy.Muslims accepts Ijma as a source of Law and Considers Yazeed as Lanati according to it.where as Zakir has alienated himself from this Important source of Law.he nomore Considers numerous Authorities on Islam on Correct path.WHY? due to his Jahilyya Understanding.He comes in the Category of Ghair Muqallid.
    This narrow and Personal Interpretation of him has deviated him and his followers.He may be good Orator but not good Islamic Scholar.He may be good debator but not an Authority on Islam.
    Read Islamic History dont Confuse urself with Hindusuperstitions with Islamic traditions.
    Study Islam its Spread in Various Major Countries and prcatices of Muslims.

  • Sher-e-Ghousia May 21, 2008 at 11:24 pm #

    Shajahan,

    If you read his (ZN the MaN) post you will notice something striking; WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE?

    Such as:

    – “ONLY ZAKIR NAIK HAVE ASK ABOUT THESE STATEMENTS WHICH ALLAH HAVE ASK US TO CONVEY ”

    – “So he is more following the Quran rather then u people who based there religion on HISTORICAL TEACHING BUT NOT QURAN.”

    – “Tell me what your scholar have done of which u r so proud of “NOOOOTTTTTTHHHHHIIIIIIIINNNNNGGG.”

    Where are the evidences for these. Obviously, someone is blindly defending the undefendable. You can’t tell me to provide the evidences and ingnore his blind comments.

    If you read my ealier posts, you would see Dr Naiks opinions are against the great Shcolars of the past, such as Imam Hanbal (Radi Allahu Ta’ala Anhu).

    Some Dr Naik fans say “he backs up his statements with references”. But your missing one huge point. Saying a reference and understanding a reference are 2 different things. Something which Dr Naik fans cannot seem to understand.

    Remember one thing, Haq is more important than any Scholar. And Imam Hussain (Radi Allahu Ta’ala Anhu) is more important than any shcolar.

    You either support Yazid and Dr Naik, Imam Hussain (Radi Allahu Ta’ala Anhu) and what he represents.

  • Sher-e-Ghousia May 21, 2008 at 11:27 pm #

    Edit from last sentence:

    You either support:

    – Yazid and Dr Naik

    – Or Imam Hussain (Radi Allahu Ta’ala Anhu) and what he represents.

    SIMPLE!

  • ZN the Man May 22, 2008 at 8:17 pm #

    I think u closed ur eyes where I pointed out the EVIDENCE Quran 19:v88-92: Christians abusing ALLAH” and as far as what ur scholar have done this what i asked u..

    SHOW ME ANY MUSLIM WHO HAS DEFEND ISLAM PROPAGATE ISLAM, CLEAR ALL THE MISCONCEPTIONS AND FALSE CHARGE AGAINST ISLAM BESIDES ZAKIR NAIK.YOU WILL FIND NONE.

    Other point is that people who r commenting on the incident of karabala they r TOTALLY NEGLECTING all the previous good works of Zakir Naik bcoz he said some thing which goes against their (parents taught) teaching of Karbala. This is what I called HYPROCRISY which the shias r doing if u fell that what he said was not appropriate then u should only argue about that statement but criticizing all his goods works towards ISLAM shows Shia’s jelousy n Hyprocrisy.

    If anyone read the Quran he will surely reliaze that in Quran ALLAH (in majority) is talking to the JEWS n CHRISTIANS telling us what they did was wrong n for e.g in..
    Ch.002.040. “O Children of Israel! call to mind the (special) favour which I bestowed upon you, and fulfil your covenant with Me as I fulfil My Covenant with you, and fear none but Me”.
    Ch.002.041. “And believe in what I reveal, confirming the revelation which is with you, and be not the first to reject Faith therein, nor sell My Signs for a small price; and fear Me, and Me alone”.
    Ch.002.042. “And cover not Truth with falsehood, nor conceal the Truth when ye know (what it is)”.

    So to whom Allah is speaking here to muslim definetly not to the Jews so how many muslim have convey these statement to the Jews (we r more involve in history)

    Similarly to Christians..
    Ch.005.072.” They do blaspheme who say: “Allah is Christ the son of Mary.” But said Christ: “O Children of Israel! worship Allah, my Lord and your Lord.” Whoever joins other gods with Allah,- Allah will forbid him the garden, and the Fire will be his abode. There will for the wrong-doers be no one to help”.
    Ch.005.073. “They do blaspheme who say: Allah is one of three in a Trinity: for there is no god except One Allah. If they desist not from their word (of blasphemy), verily a grievous penalty will befall the blasphemers among them”.

    So agains I will ask u how many of us have convey these statements of the Quran to Christians.

    SO THIS IS WHY HE IS MORE FOLLOWING THE QURAN AND WHAT ALLAH HAS ORDER US MUSLIM..We muslim have made Islam only a religion of worship i.e(salah,ramadan,hajj, etc..) n have neglect all other teaching of the Quran which Allah ask us to do.

    Christian r abusing ALLAH as I mentioned before in Ch.19:v.88:92″BIGGISTABUSE ACCORDING TO THE QURAN” this does’t hurt u BUT if someone says (r.a) after Yazeed name u feel sad and u make it a very big issue..

    I THINK U LOVE HUSSAIN(R.A) MORE THAN ALLAH(SWT)..Otherwise u and your scholar would have ask about these statements to Christians.

    Our salvation does’t depend on who killed Hussain (r.a)
    Allah says in Quran..
    Ch.002.134.”That was a people that hath passed away. They shall reap the fruit of what they did, and ye of what ye do! Of their merits there is no question in your case!”

    So now shutdown this over BLOWN issue against the GREAT ISLAMIC SCHOLAR OF OUR ERA..

    PEACE BE ON U.

  • Sher-e-Ghousia May 23, 2008 at 6:01 pm #

    Complete nonsense. Do you even have a clue? Dr Zakir Naik is not a prophet but a mere human, so he is liable for criticism. If he makes such an insulting statement, do you want us to stay quiet and let everyone think it’s okay to say ‘may Allah be pleased with him’ after Yazids name?

    Dr Naik has indeed influenced many people to convert to Islam but so have people from Dawat-e-Islami and Minhaj-ul Qur’an. So, yes, our Scholars (and normal brothers) are doing something.

    Now let’s get back to the original point of this post, which is Dr Naiks comments about Yazid (May Allah’s curse be on him). If Dr Naik is so good, then why is his opinion against that of these two great Scholars of the past:

    – The great Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal (Radi Allahu Anh) was asked by his son that a group of people (qawm) attribute us to [be with] yazid , he replied, O son! Whoever believes in Allah, how can they have any association with yazid? and why should he not be cursed (laanat) when Allah sends laanat on him in his Book. He asked where did Allah send laanat on him in his Book? The Imam replied “in this saying of Allah Ta’la”:

    Do you then have the sign that if you get the authority, spread disorder in the land and sever your ties of Kinship? These are they whom Allah has cursed and made them deaf from the truth and made their eyes blind. (47:22-23), and then says, is there any greater fasad than the murdering of Husayn?

    Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal is from the mujtahid Imams, muqallad of the Hanabali madhab who lived from 164-241 AH.

    (Mentioned in multiple sources such as Ibn Hajar Makki in al-Sawa’iq al-Muhriqa page 333, Tafsir Mazhari v. 8. p. 434 Imam Barzanji in al-Isha’at, Qadi Abu Ya’la in Mu’tamad al-Usool, ibn al-Jawzi and so on)

    – Imam Jalal Uddin Suyuti mentions in his book ‘The History of the Rightly Guided Caliphs’ (Taarekh ul Khulufaa al-Raashideen); “Nawfal bin Abi al-Faraat said ‘Once I was with Umar bin Abdul Aziz when a man said in his presence ‘Yazid, the leader of the believers’ (Ameer ul Mu’mineen). Umar bin Abdul Aziz said [in shock] ‘Did you call Yazid the Leader of the Believers? Umar then ordered for the man to be lashed 20 times”.

    As you can see, mentioning Yazid’s name with praise is punishable.

    PS: From now on, I’m not going to get into ‘this Scholar has done this’, this scholar is better’ debate. That’s for Allah Ta’ala to decide. Let’s stick to the topic please.

  • Sher-e-Ghousia May 23, 2008 at 6:03 pm #

    You either support:

    1) Imam Hussain (Radi Allahu Ta’ala Anhu) and what he represents.

    2) Yazid and his lawyer Dr Naik

    Now which option are you going to choose? 1 or 2? Truth or falsehood?

  • warsi May 23, 2008 at 8:42 pm #

    Very Nice …SHER-e- Ghousia..

    The zakir’s follower must answer are they with Hussain or with yazeed?
    that’s it

  • shajahan May 26, 2008 at 10:58 am #

    Warsi` Question is like : Are you the party of Allah or Iblees?

    All muslims are the party of Allah. Hisbullah. I dont say Zakir naik is 100% correct. Only the words of Rasool sallallahu alaihiwasallam is 100% correct. The eminent and the top awliya is Rasoolulla sallallahu alaihiwasallam. he is the best. The Sahaba use his hair for cure and use his sweat for perfume. no other man is eminent like that. even the all ulamas dead or alive cannot compare with him. We should honor Hussain Radhiyallahu anhu because he was called the Fragrance of rasool (sallallahu alaihiwasallam ). We can say 100% he was a martyr, because Rasool sallallahu alaihiwasallam told that Hassan and Husain Radhyallahu anhum will be the leaders of the youth in the heaven. this is the word of Rasoolsallallahu alaihiwasallam. we should accept it. also, We don`t know the exact situation of karbala. the people live 1300 years after the karbala talking and fighting for it. but we need the exact proof of yazid`s involvement in it. Wahshi Radhiyallahu anhu killed Hamsa Radhiyallahu anhu but he became muslim and become a sahaba. so this matter we should leave to Allah. If somebody blindly follow zakir naik is a mukallid. swallowing what he say is not good at the same time get trapped in the sayings of Shia also blameworthy. We should all become the mukalid of Rasool sallallahu alaihiwasallam not the imams or khojas.

  • shajahan May 26, 2008 at 12:09 pm #

    Our attitude towards Yazeed ibn Mu’aawiyah
    I heard of this person Yazeed Ibn Muawiyah. I heard that he once a calipha of the muslims and he was a drunken sadistic person, who was not really a muslim. Is this true? Please tell me his story. Thank you and may allah bless you.

    Praise be to Allaah.

    His name was Yazeed ibn Mu’aawiyah ibn Abi Sufyaan ibn Harb ibn Umayaah al-Umawi al-Dimashqi.

    Al-Dhahabi said: he was the commander of that army during the campaign against Constantinople, among which were people such as Abu Ayyoob al-Ansaari. Yazeed was appointed by his father as his heir, so he took power after his father died in Rajab 60 AH at the age of thirty-three, but his reign lasted for less than four years.

    Yazeed is one of those whom we neither curse nor love. There are others like him among the khaleefahs of the two states (Umawi/Umayyad and ‘Abbaasi/Abbasid) and the governors of various regions, indeed there were some among them who were worse than him. But the issue in the case of Yazeed is that he was came to power forty-nine years after the death of the Prophet SAWS (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him); it was still close to the time of the Prophet and some of the Sahaabah were still alive such as Ibn ‘Umar who was more entitled to the position than him or his father or his grandfather.

    His reign began with the killing of the martyr al-Husayn and it ended with the battle of al-Harrah, so the people hated him and he was not blessed with a long life. There were many revolts against him after al-Husayn, such as the people of Madeenah who revolted for the sake of Allaah, and Ibn al-Zubayr.

    (Siyar A’laam al-Nubalaa’, part 4, p. 38)

    Shaykh al-Islam described people’s attitudes towards Yazeed ibn Mu’aawiyah, and said:

    The people differed concerning Yazeed ibn Mu’aawiyah ibn Abi Sufyaan, splitting into three groups, two extreme and one moderate.

    One of the two extremes said that he was a kaafir and a munaafiq, that he strove to kill the grandson of the Prophet SAWS (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) to spite the Messenger of Allaah and to take revenge on him, and to avenge his grandfather ‘Utbah, his grandfather’s brother Shaybah and his maternal uncle al-Waleed ibn ‘Utbah and others who were killed by the companions of the Prophet SAWS (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), by ‘Ali ibn Abi Taalib and others on the day of Badr and in other battles – and things of that nature. To have such a view is easy for the Raafidis who regard Abu Bakr, ‘Umar and ‘Uthmaan as kaafirs, so it is much easier for them to regard Yazeed as a kaafir.

    The second extreme group think that he was a righteous man and a just leader, that he was one of the Sahaabah who were born during the time of the Prophet and were carried and blessed by him. Some of them give him a higher status than Abu Bakr and ‘Umar, and some of them regard him as a prophet. Both views are obviously false to one who has the least common sense and who has any knowledge of the lives and times of the earliest Muslims. This view is not attributable to any of the scholars who are known for following the Sunnah or to any intelligent person who has reason and experience.

    The third view is that he was one of the kings of the Muslims, who did good deeds and bad deeds. He was not born until the caliphate of ‘Uthmaan. He was not a kaafir but it was because of him that the killing of al-Husayn happened, and he did what he did to the people of al-Harrah. He was not a Sahaabi, nor was he one of the righteous friends of Allaah. This is the view of most of the people of reason and knowledge and of Ahl al-Sunnah wa’l-Jamaa’ah.

    Then they divided into three groups, one which cursed him, one which loved him and one which neither cursed him nor loved him. This is what was reported from Imaam Ahmad, and this is the view of the fair-minded among his companions and others among the Muslims. Saalih ibn Ahmad said: I said to my father, some people say that they love Yazeed. He said, O my son, does anyone love Yazeed who believes in Allaah and the Last Day? I said, O my father, why do you not curse him? He said, O my son, when did you ever see your father curse anybody?

    Abu Muhammad al-Maqdisi said, when he was asked about Yazeed: according to what I have heard he is neither to be cursed nor to be loved. He said, I also heard that our grandfather Abu ‘Abd-Allaah ibn Taymiyah was asked about Yazeed and he said: we do not deny his good qualities or exaggerate about them. This is the fairest opinion.

    Majmoo’ Fataawa Shaykh al-Islam, part 4, p. 481-484

    Islam Q&A
    Sheikh Muhammed Salih Al-Munajjid

  • Sher-e-Ghousia May 26, 2008 at 1:04 pm #

    Shajahan, firstly I would like to applaud you for understanding my point. We should not follow ‘scholars’ over Haq.

    However…….

    The article you posted has clear lies in it such as when it states Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal said, “O my son, when did you ever see your father curse anybody?” If you read my earlier post regarding the great Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal (Radi Allahu Anh) you will see he clearly said yazid is a kafir and should be cursed.

    Here are the references: Mentioned in multiple sources such as Ibn Hajar Makki in al-Sawa’iq al-Muhriqa page 333, Tafsir Mazhari v. 8. p. 434 Imam Barzanji in al-Isha’at, Qadi Abu Ya’la in Mu’tamad al-Usool, ibn al-Jawzi and so on)

    The article says, “He (yazid) was not a kaafir…… This is the view of most of the people of reason and knowledge and of Ahl al-Sunnah wa’l-Jamaa’ah.” What nonsense. Where is the evidence? The article says this person said this and this person said that without providing any references to where the great Scholars of the past said those things.

    I am willing to accept difference on certain issues, but I definitely won’t accept lies to make it look as if the Great Imams believed yazid was not a kafir and was not deserving of lannat.

  • shajahan May 26, 2008 at 1:24 pm #

    can you say the situation when one muslim become a murtadh?
    if he forsake the kalima he become a kafir. even if a muslim do major sins he will be considered inside the fold of islam. the iman increase and decrease when a muslim do the crimes. but he never become a kaffir. if somebody eager to make others are kaffir that will be a big sin on him if he cannot give the evidence on him. Rasool Sallallahu alaihiwasallam said if somebody allege the other is kaffir one of them is kaffir. so if you use this word without any evidence you will be accountable for Allah subhanahuwataalah. ahlu ssunna wal jamaah is not a takfiri organization like khawarij to give the fatwa at once without getting any knowledge that the person forsake his kalima. if some body keep his shahada and say he is a muslim no body can call him a kaffir. We are not Vatican preists to say who will go to heaven and who will go to jahannam. only Allah knows. Even Rasool Sallallahu alaihivasallam said ten sahabas name that they would enter jannah. nobody can predict except Allah.

  • Sher-e-Ghousia May 26, 2008 at 8:55 pm #

    Actually, the kufr of yazid is proven.

    Yazid made those things Halal which Allah Ta’la explicitly made haram, this is sareeh kufr which no one denies. Imam Husayn (Radi Allahu Ta’ala Anhu) himself said this; can there be any stronger authority possible?

    When ibn Ziyad presented the head of Imam Husayn (Radi Allahu Ta’ala Anhu) to yazid, he was very happy and the respect and honour he had for ibn ziyad increased. Soon he realised that the people began to hate him and send laanat on him. Yes at the time of Imam Husayn (Radi Allahu Ta’ala Anhu) people sent laanat on him! (Tarikh Kamil v. 4, p. 87)

    Mullah Ali Qari writes that yazid did those things that prove his kufr such as holding alcohol permissible and the words which he uttered at the time of the murdering of Imam Husayn (Radi Allahu Ta’ala Anhu) that he avenged the death of his elders that were killed in the battle of badr. This is why Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal called him a kafir (Mullah Ali Qari in Sharah Fiqh al-Akbar p. 88)

    Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal (Radi Allahu Anh) calls yazid a kaffir. So, are trying to say the Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal (Radi Allahu Anh) has become a kaffir? Allah Forbid!

  • shajahan May 27, 2008 at 9:26 am #

    You asked that:
    You either support:

    – Yazid and Dr Naik

    – Or Imam Hussain (Radi Allahu Ta’ala Anhu) and what he represents.

    O.K. Can you say me taking the context of Jamal battle in which Ali Radhiyallahu Anhu and Aisha Radhiayllahu anha fought opposite? in this war whom you will support? Ali Radhiyallahu Anhu or Aisha Radhiayllahu anha?

    also please tell me brother which madhhab you follow for your fiqhi issues?

  • Sher-e-Ghousia May 27, 2008 at 6:42 pm #

    Your question is obviously flawed and trying to take away the blame from the cursed yazid.

    If you read the full story of that battle and what followed, you will see that it ended in a completely different manner from that of Imam Hussain (Radi Allahu Ta’ala Anhu) and yazid. That battle of Jamal was between the blessed Sahabas and Family of the Holy Prophet (Sallal lahu alayhi wa’sallam) and no Scholar has ever took sides with them.

    An example between the 2 battles would be if your parents had an argument, which would you choose? Obviously both are beloved to you, so you would choose both. However, if a person from your street insulted your father, you would obviously take your father’s side.

    In the same way, the Sahaba and Ahle Bayt are both good, so the Ahle Sunnah love and respect all of them. However, with yazid, many great scholars of the Salaf have cursed him and called him a kaffir. So If I say I take the side of Imam Hussain (Radi Allahu Ta’ala Anhu) I am following the verdicts of great Scholars of history.

    So, to answer your question, I support all the Sahaba and Ahle Bayt.

    However, if you say you support both Imam Hussain (Radi Allahu Ta’ala Anhu) and yazid, according to some great Scholars of Islam and also the words of the Sahaba and Ahle Bayt, you are committing a sin and liable for punishment.

    End of the day, it comes down to your love for Imam Hussain (Radi Allahu Ta’ala Anhu) and the words of the Holy Prophet (Sallal lahu alayhi wa’sallam). If you have the love you will feel sick even at the mention of the name of that dictator yazid.

    PS: I follow the Hanafi Madhab. But I don’t see why this matters as this is a matter of Aqi’dah and not ‘fiqh.

  • Sher-e-Ghousia May 27, 2008 at 6:46 pm #

    You said, “ahlu ssunna wal jamaah is not a takfiri organization like khawarij to give the fatwa”.

    Are you trying to imply something?

    If someone does something to make them a kaffir, indeed they are a kaffir. This is not me saying it, Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal (Radi Allahu Anh) himself declared yazid as a kaffir.

  • shajahan May 28, 2008 at 6:53 am #

    As you are a hanafi muqallid, why you are quoting widely from hambal rahamatullahi alaihi? if it is aqeeda issue or fiqhi, if it was followed by the salafussaliheen we have to abide it. hambal (r) was the thorn in the throat of muataziliyas at the same time he was the contemporary of Imam bukhari (R) he had got the most hadiths than the earlier madhab imams. So if you are the follower of the haq why you are not follow the madhab of Hambali? that is why I asked you which madhab you follow? it was connected to this debate. aqeedah or fiqh muslim should close to the haq. So from your answer that you are a muqallid of hanafi, it means that you set aside the opinion of imam Hambal in some issues and blindly follows Imam Abu haneefa (R), so if something somebody says which favor to you or support your thought you take that opinion and blindly follows it. Thats why Allah Subhanahu wataala said that don`t follow your desires. you have to win your point of view so you take imam hambal, if i debate with you the fiqhi issues you will discard Hambal R even if there is haq in his opinion and follow the Hanafi madhab. is it?

  • Sher-e-Ghousia May 28, 2008 at 6:17 pm #

    First of all it is not called blind following, but Taqlid. You need to read more about this issue before saying:

    – “why you are quoting widely from hambal rahamatullahi alaihi?”

    – “So if you are the follower of the haq why you are not follow the madhab of Hambali?”

    – “you set aside the opinion of imam Hambal in some issues and blindly follows Imam Abu haneefa (R)”

    Secondly, all 4 madhabs are Haq and the followers of Haq have the option to follow 1 of the 4 Madhabs. In matters of FIQH we are allowed to differ. Even the Sahabas (Radi Allahu Ta’ala anhum ama’een) differed on matters of fiqh. On certain matters of fiqh, we can follow the opinion of Imam Hanbal or Imam Shaf’ee (Radi Allahu Ta’ala anhum) even though we follow the Hanafi Madhab. That is the beauty of Islam.

    Fiqh is derived from religious texts. Whilst the kufr of an individual is taken from evidences provided by the Scholars. Whether they are Imam Abu Hanifa, Imam Malik, Imam Hanbal or Imam Shaf’ee (Radi Allahu Ta’ala anhum) doesn’t matter. If your read the works of the early Scholars (mainly available in Arabic and Persian) you will see that the strongest opinion is that yazid was a tyrant, a kaffir and is cursed.

    Next time, before saying we should only follow Imam Abu Hanifa and why am I quoting Imam Hanbal, you should read into matters of tadlid and fiqh very deeply.

  • Sher-e-Ghousia May 28, 2008 at 6:20 pm #

    Here is evidence of what the great-grandson of Sayyiduna Umar (Radi Allahu Ta’ala anhu) though of yazid.

    Imam Jalal Uddin Suyuti mentions in his book ‘The History of the Rightly Guided Caliphs’ (Taarekh ul Khulufaa al-Raashideen); “Nawfal bin Abi al-Faraat said ‘Once I was with Umar bin Abdul Aziz when a man said in his presence ‘Yazid, the leader of the believers’ (Ameer ul Mu’mineen). Umar bin Abdul Aziz said [in shock] ‘Did you call Yazid the Leader of the Believers? Umar then ordered for the man to be lashed 20 times”.

    As you can see, mentioning anything good with yazid is punishable.

  • Sher-e-Ghousia May 28, 2008 at 6:24 pm #

    Before you make any further comments, could you answer my earlier question.

    So the question was, do you support:

    1) Imam Hussain (Radi Allahu Ta’ala Anhu) and what he represents.

    2) or yazid and his lawyer Dr Naik

    Now which option are you going to choose? 1 or 2? Truth or falsehood?

    Be careful, according to some Scholars you could be liable for punishment by saying anything good about yazid.

  • shajahan May 29, 2008 at 5:35 am #

    For your question whom i am supporting is already I explained. I told you I am not the blind follower of Zakir Naik. I did not say he is a mujtahid or mujaddid of islam. he may say good and he may say bad. he is not 100%. What he do for islam Allah will give him reward for it. if he say bad He will be accountable before Allah. Tthe martyr of Hussein is a sorrowful incident and no body could read the incident without tears. Also, If I believe that yazid is a muslim king and I don`t think I will be out of islamic fold.

  • shajahan May 29, 2008 at 6:33 am #

    Thank you for your advice for reading more about fiqh. FYI, I am not a scholar. anyway, The differences as you said between the sahabas is not made by themselves for making controversy. If some sahabas did not get the hadith of rasool sallallahu aliahiwa sallam in some issues they deduce themselves. but if somebody inform them there is hadith about it they forsake their own opinion and take the words of Rasool sallallahu alihiwasallam. the same is with the Madhab imams. The islamic priests teaches the common muslims that there is differences and it is beauty of islam. Rasool sallallahu alaihiwasallm said that the Jews split to 71 and one will enter jannah, christians split to 72 groups one group will enter jannah all other will go to jahannam, Muslims will split to 73 group and one will enter to the jannth all will go to the hell. Sahaba Asked who is that one group? Rasool sallallahu alaihiwasallm said whoever follows me and my sahaba. So difference in opinion and split in the community is not good it is bad. the preists of Khurafat need the differences so that they can be the leaders of muslim and fill their stomach with the money of tabaruk and convince people to sujood to the awliyas khabar.

  • Sher-e-Ghousia May 29, 2008 at 5:58 pm #

    May Allah Ta’ala show us the path of Haq. Ameen.

  • shajahan May 31, 2008 at 6:05 am #

    The first thing the muslim community faces is the superstitions (khurafat) in their rituals and in the practices. The idols (khabar) in side the darga is being worshipped. Allah may forgive all the sins except shirk. this is the big challenge the muslim community of the continent faces. Shia, barelvi, sufis, ismailis, boharas, kharijites all try to instill thier practices to Ahulussunna wal jamaa. they are the enemy within.

    For your prayer I say ameen too…….

  • Talha Rafique June 2, 2008 at 7:08 am #

    Dear All AOA!

    You all people who are speaking against Dr Zakir Naik on this thing are misguided by traditional Molvies which have no research and depend on week and very week references and ignore the authentic references. So keep in mind always be unbais and fear Allah and don’t blackmale an islamic researcher person like Dr Zakir Naik. Keep in mind anybody who will research islamic history without being bais, will conclude that we cann’t curse yazeed. Plz fear Allah and do research.Allah will never ask you wether you curse yazeed or not. Just prepare for
    hereafter..And Be Silent…….

  • warsi June 2, 2008 at 11:59 am #

    who taught u reading/reciting Quran Sharif in ur Childhood?
    These traditional Molvies have served a great Service to Islam by not Leaving the the duty to to teach and Spreading islam, not Like irrational,Unreasonable,Illogical,Unscientific so called Prgressive Modern Scholars who got deviated in the Name of Logic and Reason.

    If the efforts of these Maulvis would not have been done People like You Could have been taught American books Al-Furqan (American Version of Quran) and rasing the Jewish Slogans.

    The SoCalled Authentic references were not presented by You in Support of Your beloved Yazid and Zakir Naik So it is Obvious you are showing your Ignorance.
    Go to Some Other Site to Inject your Yazidi Views.

  • Sher-e-Ghousia June 2, 2008 at 8:38 pm #

    Sufi Warsi Sahib, it is clear from all the pro-zakir naik comments just how ignorant his supporters are. They can’t provide any evidences but just provide their opinions. But, when we provide solid eveidences which is backed up by the Scholars of the Salaf, these Zakir Naik supporters blindly reject them.

    Ya Hussain al Madad

    Ya Ghousul Azam al Madad

  • Talha Rafique June 3, 2008 at 1:43 am #

    Phonkon say Ya Charagh Bujaya najaya Ga:

    last their was some good question by someone posted for Mr Warsi. But why it is deleted?

    I will post the same Question:
    If Hazrat Hussain(RA) consider Yazeed (Bin Maveya) a Kaffir why he (RA) present the army three conditions:
    1) Let me to visit Yazeed
    2) Let me to return back Madina
    3) Let me to go for Jihad on Border

    Ponder on these points and then see the fatwas of Imam Ghazale and Ahmed Raza Khan.

    The best islmic thinking is that we should keep quite on this issue because it is an sorrowful event of islmic history same like wise battles between Hazrat ALi (RA) and Amir Maveya(RA).
    Karbla was battle between two muslim groups.
    so we cann’t say it battle of Haq and Batil. Both groups say their prayers in kerbala.
    So It was the Aqida of Just Shias which dont’t believe in Sahabas(RA).
    The miserable shada is of Hazrat Uthman(RA) that was done by Kharjis inMuharram between 1-9 and Harat Umar(RA) by a Kaffir but no body say a single word about these events just like Shias that use rough language about shabas.

    WE SHOULD KEEP SILENT ON KARBLA ISSUE AND PREPARE FOR OUR HEREAFTER. PEOPLE SHOULD NEVER SPREAD HATERED AMONG MUSLIMS.
    WARSI SHAB YOU SHOULD USE ALWAYS GOOD LANGUAGE WHICH IS THE SUNNAH.

    YOU SAID:
    who taught u reading/reciting Quran Sharif in ur Childhood?
    These traditional Molvies have served a great Service to Islam by not Leaving the the duty to to teach and Spreading islam
    ANSWER:
    IT’S NOT MEANT THAT THEY BECAME OUR LORD AND WE BEGAN TO SAY HARAM WHAT BASELESS THING THEY SAY HARAM.THEY R NOT PROPHET.THEY JUST SPREAD SECRITARANISM.

  • Talha Rafique June 3, 2008 at 1:58 am #

    YOU SAY:
    not Like irrational,Unreasonable,Illogical,Unscientific so called Prgressive Modern Scholars who got deviated in the Name of Logic and Reason.

    If the efforts of these Maulvis would not have been done People like You Could have been taught American books Al-Furqan (American Version of Quran) and rasing the Jewish Slogans.

    The SoCalled Authentic references were not presented by You in Support of Your beloved Yazid and Zakir Naik So it is Obvious you are showing your Ignorance.

    ANSWER:
    DR ZAKIR NAIK DEFEND ISLAM IN THE WORLD WHEN YOUR MOLVIS WERE QUARRELING IN MASAJID JUST FOR NOTHING BUT FOR THEIR SHOPS LIKE TODAY THEY ARE BUSY.
    AUTHENTICITY OF DR ZAKIR IS ENOUGH IS THAT HE IS NOT A FOLLOWER OF UMATI BUT HE IS PURE FOLLOWER OF PROPHET(pbuh) HE SAY JUST QURAN AND SUNNAH OR AUTHENTIC HISTORY NOT BASED ON WEEK REFERENCES IN THE PRESENCE OF RIGHT AND STRONG REFERENCES.

    YOU SAY:
    Go to Some Other Site to Inject your Yazidi Views.
    ANSWER;
    I KNOW THAT MY POST WILL BE DELETED LIKE BEFORE THIS POST SOME POSTS WERE
    DELETED LAST NIGHT WHICH I SAW. ANY WAY YOU ARE NOT THE ONWER OF SITE EVEN NOBODY IS OWNER OF INTERNET AND THIS IS A PUBLIC DICUSSION FORUM. SO DON’T USE BOGUS MEANS AND ROUGH LANGUAGE BY IT A WRONG IMPRESSION ABOUT U WILL DEVELOP

    MAY ALLAH OPEN ON ALL
    US THE TURE WAY OF LIFE.
    MAY ALLAH UNITE THE MUSLIMS

  • Eng.Mehmood June 3, 2008 at 2:27 am #

    Aslam ala kum
    With prays,regards & good wishes IDD mubarak to all
    Regarding issue of Yazeed, my request to viewers is that in present miserable condition Muslims should give priority to eliminate differences.
    Both main sects of ISLAM believe in Allah, prophet Muhammad peace be upon Him, holy Book Quran.
    No doubt there are some minor differences based on history. Which we should ignore for unity.
    As per my personal research is concerned I do feel there is more misunderstanding created by anti Islamic elements & via self desired of both sects. Which creates gap between both sects. I have practical experiences regarding this gap being surrounded via both sects. As my nears & dears are followers of both sects.
    Some Sunneys have the following wrong conception about the religious belief of Sheas because of the results of anti Islamic activities & self desired elements plan.
    That Sheas believe it was Ali R.T.A., who deserve to be prophet.
    That Sheas don’t believe in Hadeath
    That Sheas treat Ali R.T A. as Allah
    That Sheas don’t respect Sahabas & Azwaj Mutharat
    That Sheas believe that present holy Quran is not complete
    And so many other wrong conceptions
    Regarding above mentioned created wrong conceptions that the main sect of Shea Asna Ashhere believes in Allah, Hadeath, holy Quran & have regard for Sahabas & Azwaj Mutharat. Also believe Hadeth. It is regard of Ajwaj Mutharat which compel Imam Khumane R.A. to issue Futwa against Salman Rashde.
    There are some sub sets created via Shea as there are Qadyanes created from Sunneys, like Ali Mola & other groups,who have above mentioned unislamic conceptions.
    Here let me quote saying of Imam Khumane R.A. regarding respect of Sahabes that anti Islamic elements deliberately decreases the credibility of great Islamic personalities for victimize ISLAM. Imam says that actual intention of these elements is to undermine ISLAM via blaming our heroes.
    Those self desired elements, who are involve in disgracing Islamic heroes, are part of problem for ISLAM. As those assets whose services for ISLAM & who after huge sacrifices have formed big Islamic state are worth praise for all sects of Islam.
    Both communities have belief that Ali R.T A., were most pious, brave, intellectual Sahabe & Imam. Who being from family of Prophet peace be upon Him were much close to Muhammad,so under close supervision of Muhammad peace be upon Him. That great Imam,whose services & sacrifices for Islam are worth praise & pride for us all, always provide full support to Ist three Khulphas. Even if it is lesson for those also, who claim that Ali R.T.A. was having differences with Khulfas. The support of Ali R.T.A. to Khulfas is itself lesson for us all to maintain unity, brotherhood & providing good message about Islam. Ali R.T.A. being too near to Prophet like Haroon of Mosa. One should see the Bob Ali in Sunny Hadeath Books regarding the status of Ali R.T.A. That lion of Allah neither never abuse any Khalefas nor oppose Khalafes. Even for safety of Usman R.T.A. direct both Imams Hassan & Hussain to protect Usman R.T.A. So it is religious duty of all Muslims to follow Imam.
    We can discuss some issues on the base of history but have no right to disgrace Islamic Heroes. Those who at present are not even in position to free occupied soils for Islam like these Islamic rulers or ready to provide sacrifices like Imams for Islam have morally & logically no right to criticize those Islamic heroes .As to occupy any country can be only dream. We are not even in position to free occupied lands.
    Also some Sheas on the base of planned propaganda of anti Islamic & self desired elements have some baseless conception about Sunneys
    That Sunneys don’t have regard for Ali R.T.A.
    That Sunneys don’t have regard for Hassan & Hussain R.T.A & believe in suicide of Hussain R.T.A.
    That Sunneys believe Yazed was right & Hussain R.T.A. wrong
    That Sunneys don’t regard Ahal Bayet
    And other baseless conceptions on the base of propaganda.
    Sunneys have much respect for Ahal Bayet. How can one have concerns about those in favor of whom there are so many Hadeath of Prophet Muhammd peace be upon Him. Even to pay blessings to Ahal Bayet is must via Darood Ibrahim for all Muslims in their prays.
    For Sunneys these pious personalities have regard & respect as per spirit of Islam.. They are respected by both sects. Hassan Hussain declared as sardars of Heaven by Muhammad peace be upon Him. How can any Muslim dare to commit against these sardar Immams.
    Sunney & Sheas have common faith that Yazed was not on right path & cruel ruler. Who was involve in crimes including big sin Shadat of Hussain R.T.A.& His nears dears & innocents. No doubt there are some people who as per plan of anti Islamic elements are involve to prove Yazed on right path. Which majority of Sunneys don’t accept. Also for those who believe in Islam should avoid to accept this logic that any person involve in atrocities to family of prophet Muhammad peace be upon Him can be fair. Majority of past & present great Sunny scholars have common logic that Yazed is wrong & Imam right.
    At present miserable situation we should avoid to raise such issues, which can create more disunity. But should concentrate unity.
    Scholars of both sects should come forward to provide proper guideline & unite both sects.
    For eliminating gap my request is that Sheas should avoid to raise questions for those, who are worth praise for Sunneys & Sunneys should avoid to protect anti Islamic rulers like Yazed, who were directly involve in victimize Imams & other Islamic scholars. As there is no comparison between Imams & hamams.
    Sheas should introduce in their literature the services of Sahabes for Islam & Sunneys to introduce the sacrifices of Immams for Islam. As it is observed that Sunneys know about services of Sahabes ,Wales but not more about sacrifices & services of Imams like Imam Jaffer, Imam Zain ul Abdin, Imam Ali raza….,Whose full life is itself the reflection of their origin prophet Muhammad.
    Allah says if any act you feel is wrong has right side also.
    After first fair interior Islamic Jehad in Karbala kept Allah kept away umpire with them, Umpire was never desire of any Imam. Even they reject such offers. This positive approach provide them chance to preach ISLAM through out World. So Sunneys in addition to giving credit to Sahabes for their sacrifices for Islam, Muslim rulers for invading non muslim countries should remember the sacrifices of Sadats for teaching Islam also. Even these Sadats with other Taba tabeeb Sahabes, Muslim scholars, businessmen visit far flung areas like soils Indonesia, Malashia, Kashmir…..for preaching Islam. These Sadats were followers of both sects. But their mission was to preach Islam only. When Shah Hamdan R.A. came Kashmir for preaching Islam. He found some Hindus already were converted Hanfe Muslims.He being from Shafe sect in His seventeen pious visits from Iran to Kashmir preach as per Hanfe belief. When He was questioned regarding this attitude His reply was if he will introduce shafism,it will disturb mission to preach Islam. Which is open lesson for those preachers who only concentrate their sect throughout world. Even I have personal experience that after some fair efferts when I along with some brothers succeed to motivate a person to adopt right path. Some followers of another sect try to motivate him to adopt their belief, which confused him.
    Sheas should introduce the positive aspects of all such Sahabes, rulers, scholars who have sacrificed & served for Islam. There is no doubt about this realty that the attitude of some rulers with Sadats & other Islamic scholars was too much rude. But if we analyze neutrally & honestly there are some evident that some Sadats were involve in clashes with each other . Also scholars like imam Hanefa of Sunney sect were victim of such rulers. Even under some Sheas regim same cruel acts were repeated. So for cruel acts we should avoid to blame Sunneys or Sheas. Such rulers are neither sincere with Sheas nor Sunneys.
    There is majority of rulers even some from Benea Umea like Maeya bin Yazeed, umer bin Aziz, whose attitude was with regards & respect for Sadats & other well wishers of Islam.
    We should keep the sentiments of others in mind while committing about any Islamic hero . Even Islam teaches us not to disgrace gods of Kafres. Then how can we justify to disgrace those personalities, who are part of Iman for Sunneys & Sheas. Any type of dishonor via any side for such personalities is the base of disunity.
    If we check our history even at present via disgracing any high cadre of any sect nether Shea Sheikhs will succeed to motivate Sunnys nor Sunney ulmas will succeed to satisfy sheas. As in Sunney families elders preach their kids from childhood that regard of Khalifas, Imams & Azwaj Mutharat is part of Iman. Same is with Shea families that from very beginning elders teach kids to regard Ahil Bayat ,Imams & Sahabes & relatives of Muhammad including great uncle of Muhammad Abu Talab is Iman. So this regard which Muslims feel is sign of Iman remains with them throughout life. So any type of disgrace for any Sahabe or Khalafa is untolerable for Sunneys & any type of criticize for Imams even to Abu Talab is intolerable for Sheas.
    Only fair logic can do the needful, but better is to pay attention for those non muslims, who are not aware about blessings of Islam. But have wrong conception about Islam due to any nearby immature, selfdesired,corrupt,cheater,killer,greedy,lier,cruel…. morally weak Muslim.
    In present miserable situation when whole Muslim World is neither with any safety nor with peace due to far behind in modern technology. Resulting majority disputes & disturbances are in Muslim areas. Even in modern century there are so many countries occupied by big powers directly or indirectly. Need of time is to avoid to disgrace those heroes of Islam, who are respectable for both sects for eliminating differences.
    Any person if involve in blaming such heroes of Islam are pipits of anti Islam elements. Well wishers of both sects should launch unite jehad against such criminals. And both sects should concentrate the solution of present problems of Ummah. And should provide priority to serve humanity via launching more charity schemes like the Shawkat Khan Hospital, as if we compare charity field with Christian machinery there is big gap. \
    Also for any death person his or her case is with Allah. And we are answerable for our deeds. Also to discuss issues & find their solutions is the best policy than to discuss people.
    My intention is fair regarding this article. Still being sensitive subject if any person hurts should excuse me. Allah knows my hearts desire is unity,so deserve prays from all viewers as I have domestic ills. And discussion about Yazed in this web compel me to write this article. Otherwise I deserve guideline from viewers being well Educated than me.
    May allah shower His blessings on you all & web master, who provides chance to commit. AMEEN So we should abide by their rules.
    Yours brotherly
    Eng.Mehmood
    Kashmir Study Circle

  • Talha Rafique June 3, 2008 at 3:20 am #

    Dear All AOA!

    The manager of this website is warsi. I will never use rough language for him but he is a person who delete my post without giving answer because he is wrong in this matter. InshahALLAH I will design a forum and took warsi under discussion along with this topic in true sence. ********************Deleted absurd material.

  • shajahan June 3, 2008 at 10:38 am #

    We all need the unity of Muslims, but how we can cooperate with those shias who hate Aboobacker, Umar and Uthman (R) and how we can cooperate with those muslims who do sujood before the grave yard of Awliyas? The first is thouhid, if it is not clear how we could say they are good muslims. Shirk and bidaa is the biggest problem muslims faces now. Even if we are small group Allah will help muslims if they are away from shirk and bidaa. Why all cannot go back to The Quran and sunnah for eliminating the group battle. avoid the word of sheikhs but take the work of Allah and Rasool sallallahu alaihivasallam

  • warsi June 3, 2008 at 10:50 am #

    The Copy Pasting of Talha Rafiq is Deleted due to fake Posting by Various Names….

    ———————————————————
    If Hazrat Hussain(RA) consider Yazeed (Bin Maveya) a Kaffir why he (RA) present the army three conditions:
    1) Let me to visit Yazeed
    2) Let me to return back Madina
    3) Let me to go for Jihad on Border
    These arguments are neither sourced nor Neutrally referenced .
    ————————————————————
    *It is Crystal Clear from the Posts of him that he has Very deep Love towards the Murderer of Hazrat Hussain (R.A). zalim Yazeed in his Eyes is not Unjust and Pious One.
    *Battle of Karbala was not a battle of Haq and Batil.

    Ad-He need to Read the Actual article above Once again.Ala Hazrat stopped himself from declaring yazid a kafir but not Cruel/Unjust.

    __________________________________
    Note-User of foul language will be banned now.

  • Talha Rafique June 3, 2008 at 2:10 pm #

    Dear All and Brother Warsi!AOA

    I doesn’t love nor hate yazeed (bin Maveya(RA) ), May Allah forgive him for his sins. I somebody dowsn’t want to say prayer for him he should not curse him. Allah will decide about him. It is best option for our Akhira.I consider this event the sorrowful event of islamic history just like Jang-e-jamal which divide Muslims and they became week due to like events. In jang-e-jamal:
    Group 1: Ayesha (Mother of believers ,Talha and Zubair, Maveya(RA) and their companions

    Group 2: Hazrat Ali (RA) fourth Kaliph of Islam and their companions
    Both groups fought, both were muslims.

    Issue: Revenge of Uthman’s Murder

    Result of War: The result was shedding the blood of more than ten thousand Muslims.
    To whom you will blame for this event. so we should not indulge in these issue and live unitedly. I agree with shajahn:

    We all need the unity of Muslims, but how we can cooperate with those shias who hate Aboobacker, Umar and Uthman (R) and how we can cooperate with those muslims who do sujood before the grave yard of Awliyas? The first is thouhid, if it is not clear how we could say they are good muslims. Shirk and bidaa is the biggest problem muslims faces now. Even if we are small group Allah will help muslims if they are away from shirk and bidaa. Why all cannot go back to The Quran and sunnah for eliminating the group battle. avoid the word of sheikhs but take the work of Allah and Rasool sallallahu alaihivasallam.

    Keep in mind fellows, the murder of Hazrat Umar(RA) and Hazrat Uthman (RA) was between 1-9 Muharam and also keep in mind the most miserable shahadat in the history of islam is of “Hazrat Uthman’ with hunger of 50 days. But is there any Shia do mourn for him(RA)?
    But they use rough language for both of them.And we indulge in a doubtful thing and co-operate with them in wrong matter.

    ‘****edited.

  • Sher-e-Ghousia June 3, 2008 at 5:46 pm #

    The lawyers of yazid (Allah’s curse be on him) will always try, but Haq will always prevail.

    Ya Abu Bakr

    Ya Ali

    Ya Hussain

    Ya AlaHazrat Ahmad Raza Khan

  • shajahan June 4, 2008 at 9:06 am #

    Hey mr. Sher,
    I understand from your posting that you have got knowledge about islam. why then you would like spread the superstition like calling other than Allah? If you pray or curse for yazid it cannot affect your belief but you will be accountabel before Allah. but you call like YA Ali, Ya abubakar or Ya rasoolallah this is not an acceptable practice of Islam.

    Dear brothers, Pray to Allah Only. rasool Sallallahu alaivallam said, “Addua al Al ibaada“ ie. Dua is worship. Only call YA Allah for you all problems. dont call other than Allah in your life`s problems. without any dependance and reason only Allah can help you. That is we say 17 times in our Daily prayes: Iyyaka naabudu wa iyyaka nasthageen. we worship only you and we ask help from you only. this is the thouhid. if you adhere to it, there should be no hero worshipping. There is no hero worship in islam like idol worshippers. Our hero is only Allah and he guide us nobody can make even the skin of a seed. Allah challenges whole the kuffars that bring a book like Allah`s book, nobody could, this challenge still continues. Is anybody there?

  • Talha Rafique June 4, 2008 at 4:11 pm #

    Dear All AOA and Brother Shahjahan!
    I am totally agree with you because there is no a single evidence of this practice or like that among companions of Rasool-Allah (SAW):
    If it is permissible they can call Ibrahim(AS) or other prophets.
    To say like this not a Sunnah not order of Rasool-Allah(SAW).
    This is the actual matter for dicussing but this forum is designated just for to blackmale Dr Zakir Naik who can’t be defeated in world of arguments. People think that they caught him on wrong foot but he is on right foot but nobody ready to listen his arguments. The people who consult him on this issue are satisfy because is not an issue our salvation. May Allah clear this minor and all other issues on Muslims of the whole word and I pray for all that Allah forgive our sins and save from “Shirk”.
    Every body Allah Hafiz

  • Sher-e-Ghousia June 4, 2008 at 6:11 pm #

    “Dr Zakir Naik who can’t be defeated in world of arguments”

    If you actually read the post (and the links provided) you will see that Dr Naik clearly misrepresented the fatwas by Imam Ahmad Raza Khan and Darul Ul Ifta just to save himself.

    Clearly shows how undefeatable your Dr Naik is, doesn’t it?

    Even if Dr Naik made 100 more insulting comments, those who blindly follow him will always say he is great, etc etc etc.

    Ignorance jusat breeds ignorance.

    PS:

    Just to clear something up:

    “Imaam Bukhari (radi Allahu anhu) in his “Kitaabul Adaabul Mufrad”, Imaam Ibnus Sinni and Imaam ibn Bashkool (radi Allahu anhuma) have recorded that, Hazrat Abdullah Ibn Umar (radi Allahu anhu) once suffered from a cramp. Someone advised him to remember the person whom he loved the most. The great companion then proclaimed loudly, “Ya Muhammadah.” It is recorded that he was immediately relieved.”

    Lets stick to the topic please!

  • Talha Rafique June 4, 2008 at 7:45 pm #

    AOA Shahjahn!
    False Hadith: “Seek Knowledge even if you go China for it”
    These are not the words of Rasool-Allah(SAW)…
    It has no reference;;;;;;;;;;;;So every thing which is present or spread among people may not necessarily true.
    If is could not regular in post in this forum you shold post here regularly. My exam are near. After exams i will became regular.Allah Hafiz

  • Talha Rafique June 5, 2008 at 2:25 am #

    Sher-e- you are the manager of this website **********?Now Last Warning No personal Attack/comments to site or Administration.
    Just Answer this point:
    When Imam Ghazaali was asked if it was all right to curse Yazeed, he replied “No”. He was asked was it all right to say “rahimahullah”? He said “Yes it is Mustahab (highly recommended).” [Qaid as Shareed min Akhbar e Yazeed pg 57-59]. Imam Ghazaali further said, “Yazeed was a Muslim and when we pray for the Muslims “Allhummagfirli Muslimineen was Muslimaat (O Allah forgive the Musilms men and women) he is also included in our prayers.” [Qaid as Shareed min Akhbar e Yazeed pg 57-59].

    It is just for you???????????????????????????????????
    Dr Zakir Naik who can’t be defeated in world of arguments
    ??????????????????????????????????????????????

  • Talha Rafique June 5, 2008 at 2:30 am #

    The Nespaper Zarb-e-Momin under AR-Rashid Trust comment s to keep silent on this issue and say the same thing which I said earlier :
    “Keep in mind fellows, the murder of Hazrat Umar(RA) and Hazrat Uthman (RA) was between 1-9 Muharam and also keep in mind the most miserable shahadat in the history of islam is of “Hazrat Uthman’ with hunger of 50 days. But is there any Shia do mourn for him(RA)?
    But they use rough language for both of them.And we indulge in a doubtful thing and co-operate with them in wrong matter.”

  • Talha Rafique June 5, 2008 at 2:41 am #

    Dr Zakir Naik gave courage all those organizations who want to
    disclose the truth but was hesitated. Now the people are begun to accept the reality and came to now the real situation. Which is delima for Muslim umma.

    Reality insults every blind follower. He just put up in ignorance.

  • Sher-e-Ghousia June 6, 2008 at 5:25 pm #

    Ok, answer this simple question for me, who has more authority:

    – Imam al Ghazali (rahmatullahi alayh)

    – or Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal (Radi Allahu Ta’ala anhu) and the great-grandson of Sayyiduna Umar (Radi Allahu Ta’ala anhu) Hazrat Umar bin Abdul Aziz (Radi Allahu Ta’ala anhu)

  • Sher-e-Ghousia June 6, 2008 at 5:27 pm #

    “Dr Zakir Naik who can’t be defeated in world of arguments”

    Ridiculous! I wouln’t say that for anyone apart from the Prophets (Alayhimus salam).

    This is the problem with Muslims today. They are so ignorant. Even great Scholars of the past got certain things wrong. But we don’t hear people say “such and such Shaykh can’t be defeated in world of arguments”.

    I have to give credit to Shajahan, although he is Dr Naik fan, he at least has the mental capacity to know that Dr Naik is wrong on this occasion.

  • shajahan June 7, 2008 at 5:58 am #

    mr. sher, Adab al mufrad is not an authentic sahih hadith complilation by Imam bukhari. that book contains both sahih and daeef hadiths. the mentioned hadith “ya muhammadah “ is only a nutbah. if you love some body you may call that guy and the conscience of your mind would change. so the cramp will be healed. if “ah“ will come behind the name it is a nutba. means a lamentation. you please quote from Sahih bukhari, sahir muslim,ibn majah or abu dawood.

  • shajahan June 7, 2008 at 6:04 am #

    Also, For the sake of argument, if we accept that hadith is sahih, just remind that ibn umar only asked for the muscle cramp. but now the muslim go to the makbara and darga asking to heal their worldly affairs like they ask the ded wali to cure their illness, getting married thier daughters, getting home like that. this is associating the partner with Allah`s attrubutes. (Asmaa sifath) Allah is the Shafi he is the one who cures the illness without any reason. Allahumma Antha shafi….. Oh Allah you are the only curator.

  • Sher-e-Ghousia June 7, 2008 at 11:24 am #

    Shajahan Sahib, can we stick to the topic.

    I’ll answer provide ansers to your claims another time, Insha’Allah Ta’ala.

  • shajahan June 8, 2008 at 5:06 am #

    could you please let me know who is ahmed raza khan? i am not aware of it.

  • sharif wali June 8, 2008 at 1:08 pm #

    after reading most of the comments about the wrong and factless and base less wording and comment of zakir naik i came to knw that people wanted to see the Mr Naik as the hero of Islam……..
    i would like to ask a simple question that ……… is true that zina(rape) and sharab(wine) are haram (prohibited ) in islam?????
    if yes then i answer me that why yazid is claimed to be Raziallh, while it is the fact (according to the trusted books of ahl-e- sunnt ) that yazid laeen almost used to drink bear, wine and zinna was his famous job…………refer to ur own books……….. then Mr Naik answer me on what bases you say tha sharabi and zani as raziallah …………..how the person is even a muslim who make the laws of Prolphet (PBUH) as a joke……… please dont spread the misconception…………….Yazid was Laeen and will be Laeen till Qiamat………

  • shajahan June 9, 2008 at 6:14 am #

    Are you Qawarij or muatazila? Do you think if you do zina and drink alcohol wil throw out of islamic fold? Do you know maiz radiyallahu Anhu? he did adultery and asked our prophet sallallahu alaihiwasallam to purify him ( stone to death). man what you say is qawarij ideology. adultery and alcohol is haram but it will not take you out of islam. Also, how you know Yazid did zina and Drink Alcohol? after 1350 years after you imagine from some books of shia deviators and say yazid did this and that. If you dont have evidence before Allah you will get lashes. “ hathoo burhanakkum in kunthum salihoon. Allah Ask you this. before you judge some body as adulteror or alcoholic you should bring the proof from yourself. first you study well about qarijite idea and islamic prinicples.

  • warsi June 9, 2008 at 7:24 am #

    shahjahan.

    *If u wish to Know about Imam Ahmad raza Khan read a wikipedian Article about him.
    http://www.wikipedia.org
    Your all queries regarding going dargah asking for help/dua will be Soon Published in Article form.inshAllah

  • shajahan June 11, 2008 at 6:10 am #

    Shias are maligning Ahlussunnah everywhere. They love their imams more that Rasool Sallallahu alaihivasallam. please understand that they are enemy within the muslims. Rasool Sallallahu alaivasallm said that the Dajjal will come out from Isfahan. it is from Iran or From Telaviv. Internationally Iran and Israel play the gimmick to show that only shias are opposing the jews. Israel never attack Iran and Syria (the nusayri sect) the shia leader Abdullah sabaa himself was a jew. so how they can attack. So those who believe that they are in the ahlussunnah keep the rope of Rasool sallallahu alaivasallam tightly and we will never loose against these deviant sects. Pray to Allah only. he can only help you. There is no difference among muslims in one thing: Pray to Allah Only. do anybody have difference in it?

  • Talha Rafique June 19, 2008 at 8:08 am #

    Brother Sher said:
    Ok, answer this simple question for me, who has more authority:

    – Imam al Ghazali (rahmatullahi alayh)

    – or Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal (Radi Allahu Ta’ala anhu) and the great-grandson of Sayyiduna Umar (Radi Allahu Ta’ala anhu) Hazrat Umar bin Abdul Aziz (Radi Allahu Ta’ala anhu)

    Answer: Truth has more authority. Islam does not allow to follow personalities blindly. For muslim ummah only the ideal is Prophet(SAW).
    The matter under discussing is of history. It was the time of Abasid Govt. when was written about karbala as mentioned by Shajahan above:
    “Are you Qawarij or muatazila? Do you think if you do zina and drink alcohol wil throw out of islamic fold? Do you know maiz radiyallahu Anhu? he did adultery and asked our prophet sallallahu alaihiwasallam to purify him ( stone to death). man what you say is qawarij ideology. adultery and alcohol is haram but it will not take you out of islam. Also, how you know Yazid did zina and Drink Alcohol? after 1350 years after you imagine from some books of shia deviators and say yazid did this and that. If you dont have evidence before Allah you will get lashes. “ hathoo burhanakkum in kunthum salihoon. Allah Ask you this. before you judge some body as adulteror or alcoholic you should bring the proof from yourself. first you study well about qarijite idea and islamic prinicples. ”

    In Abassid Govt. Shia were in power and wrote wrongly about karbla.
    1) Ibn-e-Kathir had not confirmed about the things fomous about yazeed so he(RA) used the word of “Traditions tells us……….”
    2) The same way the opinion of Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal (Radi Allahu Ta’ala anhu) is not the religion. It was just opinion which may changed or can be changed after knowning the turth.
    3) Does Imam Ghazali not knows who has more authority ????????

  • Talha Rafique June 19, 2008 at 8:45 am #

    Sher Brother said:
    Ridiculous! I wouln’t say that for anyone apart from the Prophets (Alayhimus salam).

    This is the problem with Muslims today. They are so ignorant. Even great Scholars of the past got certain things wrong. But we don’t hear people say “such and such Shaykh can’t be defeated in world of arguments”.

    Answer:
    Amazing yar amazing, Are “y….o….u” saying it. I just said about this particular matter.

    But the problem is that ummah divides when it blindly follow
    one great scholar and neglect the other with judging on solid arguments who is right in a particular mattar.
    Even today people has wrong beliefs like to call God fearing
    past people. and to bow before their grave.
    More delima is that today ummah follows blindly their Ala Hazrats and considers them the final authority. So the ways of Ijtehad are closed deliberately.

  • Shahzad Khan June 20, 2008 at 12:32 pm #

    Zakir Naik’s word always based on Quaranic Verses / Real Hadiths. – He never convay “stories/tales” to his listners.
    As far as myself is concerned, I learned/ understand several islamic facts which are in Quran from which i was totally unknown. We all know that nothing is more than Quran to follow.
    He basically answers on misconceptions in islam. As well as he is having a vast knowledge of Islam / Bible / Science / Hindu Vedas and mordern life.

    If a question based on Longitude/Latitude will be asked to a Mosque Imam, so most probably it will be very difficult to him to answar that kind of question, because he doesn’t know it at all.

    Every time Dr. Zakir Naik gives reference of Quaranic verse, so that we ourselves can see it in quran.

    The people are crtsyzng zakir naik, because they are jealous to him.
    If they have equalent/same amount of knowledge then they must have a debate with him…

    Allah (Subhanaotala) is the best ……

    Be Brave, Obey Quran & Hadiths (Original)

    Shahzad

  • Sher-e-Ghousia June 21, 2008 at 12:22 pm #

    Talha Rafique sahib, firstly learn what ijtihad means.

    “Truth has more authority. Islam does not allow to follow personalities blindly. ”

    If that is the case then why are your qouting Hujjat-ul Islam Imam al Ghazali (Rahmathullahi Ta’ala alay)?

    Didn’t Dr Naiks “Shaykh ul Islam” Ibn Tammiyya and followers claim Imam al Ghazali (Rahmathullahi Ta’ala alay) became mad? Astagfirrullah! Allah Forbid.

    PS: I’ve going to be very busy in the next few weeks. So excuse me for the forseable future.

  • [Ghulam-e-Raza] June 22, 2008 at 6:46 am #

    Ahmad Raza

    1.)ala hazrat knew 54 ilm
    2.)ala hazrat can write from both hands
    3.)ala hazrath is hafiz of 1400 books
    4.)ala hazart’s translation of “bismillah” is’allah ke naam se shuru’
    5.)ala hazrat is al-e-rasool with authentic shajrah [sallaho alaihi wasallam]
    6.)physically ala hazrat is very attractive
    7.)ala hazrat hates yazeed
    8.)did you hear fatwa against ala hazrat

    Zakir Naik

    1.)zakir naik know 6 ilm
    2.)zakir naik can write from only one hand
    3.)zakir naik is hafiz of 300 books
    4.)zakir naik’s translation of “bismillah”is ‘shuru allah ke naam se’
    5.)who is zakir naik
    6.)zakir naik is physically thin,lean and benoor
    7.)zakir naik uses to say ‘rahmatullah alaih’ with yazeed’s name
    8.)lot of fatwe against zakir naik from muslim world and all sects of islam

  • Najam June 24, 2008 at 7:42 am #

    How stupid comparison is this. What the hell criteria is chosen to show the superiority. Hazoor (pbuh) couldn’t write with any of his hand, does he (pbuh) has one degree less than the al-hazrat?
    Can you please give provide me the reference where it is mentioned that Muslim with particular physic will be allowed to enter in the Janah.
    Fatwes are not due to some issue with Dr. Naik these are problem with fatwa issuers (halwa molvis), they are not doing anything in favor of Islam so now they have any option left is to disgrace any person who is doing this job so people don’t know who is wrong.
    There is hadees describes “Jis ke amal ne kisi ko pechhe chhor dia to so ka Nasab us ko baja ne sake ga”.
    Only Taqwa is measurement and this is only Allah’s right and hasn’t given this to anyone else to measure other height with other.
    This is not a 12ven a jalsa and everybody will be ready to accept what is spoken. Don’t present stupid arguments otherwise keep our moth shut.

  • Shiva June 24, 2008 at 7:39 pm #

    To all the people disregarding the point trying to be made by the initial post and instead praising Dr Naik, it is time you stop hiding the truth and start realizing what’s going on here. THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH WHAT THE SHIAS BELIEVE, and for anyone here who tries to BASH the Shias, you are only making yourselves look like fools because you are the same people who blame the Shias for bashing you! This has to do with what Dr Naik said about Yazid and Karbala, which is a historical occurance that NO ONE can deny. It is part of Islamic history, it is the truth, and no one should disregard it as it was an event of high levels of bloodshed, blood that was on Hussain’s side shed for the sake of Allah, and on Yazid’s side shed for the sake of worldly affairs. How can you then be so dismissing? This war is not only something to be remembered by Shias, it is something that all Muslims, including the majority Sunnis, should remember and learn from. It is our history, it is important, and lessons can be taken from it. So I’m sorry, but never can I accept someone wishing the same great tidings, that are wished for the greatest companions of Muhammad pbbuh, on a criminal like Yazid.

  • Shiva June 24, 2008 at 7:46 pm #

    Oh, and another thing, just because Dr Naik is a “great and prominant scholar” does not mean he is not prone to making mistakes! The man is, after all, a HUMAN BEING and nothing is greater than the facts of Islam – not even him! He is nothing compared to Islam itself, and therefore, unnecessary and over-weighted praises given to him as a means to disregard the mistake he made is, in essence, a harm to Islam. He has done great things, but that doesn’t mean everything he says is acceptable. So learn to balance yourselves and your thoughts!

  • Shiva June 24, 2008 at 7:51 pm #

    And to those who think that quoting a scholar is “blindly following them”, I.E. Sher-e-Ghousia, it’s not. Just because you quote a scholar doesn’t mean you’ve blindly followed them. You blindly follow someone when you don’t look into the proofs of their statements, and when you don’t reason before accepting what they’ve ordered. That is what people on here are doing about Zakir Naik, they are blindly accpeting every single thing he says merely because he his an important scholar.

  • Talha Rafique June 25, 2008 at 9:28 am #

    AOA All Brothers!
    Dr Zakir Naik is my Brother in Islam. He is right in the matter under discussing.
    I want to say about the above comparison which shows a person’s foolishness.
    Distinction: Dr Zakir Naik is Hafiz of Hadith books and the books which was not memorized by your Describe personality ?and also obey Quran and Sunnah.

    Any way the memorization of more or less book is not the standard to say some one superior or inferior.
    You said:
    “ala hazart’s translation of “bismillah” is’allah ke naam se shuru’”
    Answer:
    Allah said:”Bismillah” Why Allah use “BIsm” before “illah”???????
    O Bahi! Don’t follow any personality blindly.

  • Talha Rafique June 25, 2008 at 9:41 am #

    You said: “zakir naik is physically thin,lean and benoor”

    Answer:
    It is not a standard but ridiculous!!!!
    Boonko say ya charah bujaya na jaya ga.
    Hazrat Ali(RA) was small in height but Muslims make them Khalifa.
    The impotance of Hazrat Ali (RA) in Islamic History is not hidden to any one.

    You said:
    “did you hear fatwa against ala hazrat”
    Answer: if a person is totally wrong and his believe in Tawheed is not right ……….we have no need to listen about him any fatwa. It is understood such a person is on wrong views.

  • Talha Rafique June 25, 2008 at 9:52 am #

    AOA! Najam, Shazad and shahjahan and all brothers! we should just follow the Quran and Sunnah even it is described by a Najarian or Philpinian black person. Because in this case we r not following him but Prophet( SAW).
    We should become simply muslim and come out form the personalities complex and other innovations of Subcontinent and try to revive islam in its true form.

  • Talha Rafique June 25, 2008 at 7:29 pm #

    Resposse to Shiva’s last post:
    What Dr Zakir said he have given its authentic proofs. But the some people just jealous of him and fear to spread the true way of Islam because in this case, their seats are in danger. So they are trying to black male him by a misconception which is spread wrongly among muslims. Now Inshah-Allah Truth will appear. I present guard of honour to Zakir Naik because he knows that a lot of muslims have misconception but he did not hide the turth and don’t fear to speak truth.
    Just answer me who is the responsible of shuhada of jange-jamal
    Hazrat Ali(RA)?
    Harat Aeysha(RA)?
    Hazrat Amir Maveya(RA)?

    What will become the muslims killed in the war?
    Who was on haq ?Who was on Batil?

  • Sher-e-Ghousia June 25, 2008 at 9:46 pm #

    I have a couple of spare minutes. Just want to clear the doubt in Shiva Sahibs mind.

    Shiva Sahib, you said,

    “And to those who think that quoting a scholar is “blindly following them”, I.E. Sher-e-Ghousia, it’s not.”

    You got me all wrong. I asked Talha Rafique that question so he can see how hypocritical he sounds. He says, “Truth has more authority. Islam does not allow to follow personalities blindly”, then quotes a Scholar without looking at the evidences. The same thing he accuses me of goes back onto him.

    To conclude, like most Sunni’s I accept Taqlid, or as some ignorant people would put it, “Blind following”.

    Hope that makes sense.

    Finally, Shiva is right. It’s not about Shia Vs Sunni. It is about Dr Naik and his comments regarding the kaffir Yazid (Allah’s curse be on him).

  • Talha Rafique June 27, 2008 at 7:49 am #

    AOA Dear All!
    Sher Brother said: “It is about Dr Naik and his comments regarding the kaffir Yazid (Allah’s curse be on him)”

    Yazeed (Bin Maveya(RA)) was a Muslim. He had believe in Prophet(PBUH), he used to said prayers. Sher has no right to say him Kaffir. According to Hadith the Kuffar will return to the person who says some one kaffir without any evidence. Allah knows best who is kaffir.

    Taqlid ki Rawish say to bahtar ha hudkushi
    Rasta b dund hijar ka sooda b choor day

    Dr Zakir has sound and authentic proofs and is not impressed by Shia views. He has given proofs that is enough for a person who is not blind follower.

  • Sher-e-Ghousia June 27, 2008 at 9:59 pm #

    Ok, my last thread before I go off.

    “Dr Zakir has sound and authentic proofs and is not impressed by Shia views. He has given proofs that is enough for a person who is not blind follower.”

    WHAT PROOF!

    How do you know his eveidences are not false like his blatant lie about Imam Ahmad Raza Khan’s (Rahmathullahi Ta’ala alay) fatawa?

    Why do you only notice Dr Naiks so called “evidences” and not any one elses? Isn’t that blind following?

    Anyone who has studied the usool of Qur’an, Hadith, Fiqh and so on will know that there is a big difference between providing stand-alone references and using them with the right understanding and context. For example, non-Muslims who insult Islam use Quranic verses out of context and without any understanding.

  • Sher-e-Ghousia June 27, 2008 at 10:00 pm #

    Finnaly, you said,

    “According to Hadith the Kuffar will return to the person who says some one kaffir without any evidence.”

    So does this also apply to the many pious Scholars who declared yazid a kaffir, such as Imam ibn Hanbal (Radi Allahu Ta’ala Anhu)? Simple Yes or No will do.

  • Imran Suleman June 28, 2008 at 3:32 pm #

    First of all I am a sunni Muslim of the Ahl sunnah w’al Jammah, i follow the Hanafi maddhab. i would like to remind you all the Dr Naik is not scholar in fiqh or Islam, he is a Dr in comparative religion.

    His comments portraying Yazid as a hero are an insult to all muslims and imam husayn who stood for truth. Dr Zakir Naik says that we should learn directly from the qur’an and hadith, but we are not knowledgeable enough to do that and we are all at risk in interpreting ayats and hadith to the desire of our nafs, this is due to our love of this dunya.

    The first people who said we should learn directly from the qur’an and hadith are the wahabbis, who are not classed as sunni’s because they have deviated. Furthermore, the wahabbis also contradict that statement in the same book. Mashallah, Dr Zakir Naik has done dawah and has spread the word of Islam, however, he is not a reliable source of Fiqh. Remember there are only sixth hadith books which have been translated in to english and there are over another 300 sahih hadith books which are yet to be translated. You dont have to do taqlid (have proof) for everything you practice, this was shown by a sahaba who was sent to Yemen by Rasool (salallahu alahi wasalm) to govern yemen, who made judgment and was not asked to provide proof.

    To all of you who talk ill of Imam al ghazali i pity you because he was a very prominent scholar and you are misquoting his word, he was a great man of tasawwuf, which is denied by Whabbis and also Ibn Taymiyya is a weak reference because he spebt the last 20 years of his life in and out of prison due to his heretical beliefs and deviation. (fact). By clinging to the words of Ibn Taymiyya you people are deviating from the sawwad al azzam.

  • stainly July 2, 2008 at 6:10 am #

    Dera Brother Imran Suleman you said “The first people who said we should learn directly from the qur’an and hadith are the wahabbis,” it is not right the first one is Mohammad Sallallaho alaihe wasallam did you forget his (PBUH) hadeeth one group will go to jannah among 73 sahabah asked him how we can recognize them then he (PBUH) said “MA ANA WA ASHABEHI” and he said i am leaving two thing. 1, Qur’an and 2, is my Sunnah(Sahih Hadeeth).so i advice you go back home do study “YA BUNAIYYAH T’ALLAM SUMMA TALALLAM”

  • Talha Rafique July 19, 2008 at 12:10 pm #

    AOA Dear All!

    Alas alas……
    You said:

    “Finnaly, you said,

    “According to Hadith the Kuffar will return to the person who says some one kaffir without any evidence.”

    So does this also apply to the many pious Scholars who declared yazid a kaffir, such as Imam ibn Hanbal (Radi Allahu Ta’ala Anhu)? Simple Yes or No will do.”

    Answer: Every person will be subjected according to the islamic teachings. How u blame the Imam ibn Hanbal(RA) for this? would you want to give proof from the books written many years after the death of imams. Can u give the chain of rawis for this that”Imam Hanbal declared Yazid a Kaffir”.
    More authentic is the Prophet’s (PBUH) hadith. you just covering your mistake even your Ala Hazrat stop himself saying yazid Kafiir.These are world of ur post.

    Mr Imran can u proof any one of the sahabi was a Hanfi????????

  • Sher-e-Ghousia July 19, 2008 at 3:41 pm #

    You are seriously mistaken my friend. Where did I blame Imam ibn Hanbal (Radi Allahu Ta’ala Anhu)? You said that “According to Hadith the Kuffar will return to the person who says some one kaffir without any evidence.” And I was just asking if that also applies to Imam ibn Hanbal (Radi Allahu Ta’ala Anhu)?

    I asked you to say yes or no, but you failed to say either. By not answering my question properly, it is clear you haven’t got a valid argument.

    If you say yes then you are implying a great scholar to be a kaffir. If you say no, then you are rejecting the hadith. So Yes or No?

    Also, here are some of the references:

    – Ibn Hajar Makki in al-Sawa’iq al-Muhriqa page 333

    – Tafsir Mazhari v. 8. p. 434

    – Imam Barzanji in al-Isha’at

    – Qadi Abu Ya’la in Mu’tamad al-Usool

    And why are you mentioning the Prophetic hadiths? The event of Karbala happened many years after the Prophet (Sall’Allahu alayhi wassalam) veiled away from this world. Therefore, the words of our Great Scholars have a big impact.

    If you actually read the real fatwa of AlaHazrat (RA) you will notice that although he kept quite and rather spend his time praising Imam Hussain (Radi Allahu Anhu), he doesn’t mind if others call Yazid a kaffir.

    If you don’t (or can’t) answer the above refutations then just answer the question below.

    I can easily list 20 great Scholars of the past who called Yazid a kaffir or something similar.

    Apart from Imam Al Ghazali (RA) Can you name me even 5 Scholars from the first few hundred years of Islam who said “Radi Allahu Anhu” after Yazids name?

  • Imran Suleman July 20, 2008 at 12:26 am #

    People, why are we regarding Dr Zakir Naik as a scholar, What is he a scholar in?

    You have to understand that he is a Dr in comparative religion, he has nor right to do talks in Fiqh according to his own ijtihad. The gates of Ijtihad were closed atleast 500 years ago. Mashallah he has brought a lot of people into Islam, however he is not a reliable source on Fiqh or history of islam, He often contradicts the views of the Sawwad al Azam (the greater majority) and often contrary to what the scholars in fiqh teach.

    He was wrong in his comments about Yazid, this just shows exactly how much respect he has for the Ahlu Bayt whom we are commanded to Love by Allah Subhana T’ala.

  • Imran Suleman July 20, 2008 at 12:46 am #

    To those who criticise the shi’as as the enemy from Islam within. They are not the ones who are creating terrorists and co-operating with the western governments, remember they do not have any American or British soldiers in their country, whereas, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait etc. do.

    The real enemy of Islam from within is Wahabbism, they are deteriorating Islam from within and are stealing the din of the uneducated youngsters.

    Also, yes Dr Zakir Naik is always referring to the Qur’an, however, this is all according to his own ijtihad. The most reliable scholars on any branch of Islamic knowledge are Awliyah Allah (wali’s) those who spent every moment of their lives in the way of Allah. The first three generations of Muslim were the best it is their teachings that we should follow.

    The teachings Dr Zakir Naik propagates are Wahabbi teachings they are not Sunni. If you think naik is right, then look into the history of teh formation of Wahabbism. They slaughtered muslims in the name of Islam which is not permissible, they attacked Makkah and Madina they destroyed shrines of ahlu bayt and sahaba which they continue to do today. If you recognise all this and then still accept their views, pray for the pity of Allah on you for you are being misguided. May Allah guide us all enlighten us with the true aqidah of Islam. Amin.

    By the way i am not shi’a i am a sunni muslim following the way of raullulah and his sahaba,. (firqat an najiyya)

  • Talha Rafique July 20, 2008 at 9:26 am #

    All Sahabas were follower of Quran & hadith. But now people are following the personalities. Stick to Quran & Sunnah.

  • Sher-e-Ghousia July 20, 2008 at 10:08 am #

    As’salamu ‘alaykum,

    Masha’Allah. Well said Imran Suleman Sahib.

    May Allah Ta’ala protect us from the nasibis (haters of the Ahle Bayt). May He Azzawajal increase our love for the Ahle Bayt (Alayhimus salam). Ameen

  • Talha Rafique July 20, 2008 at 7:05 pm #

    AOA Dear All!
    Brother Sher had given the following references:

    ” Ibn Hajar Makki in al-Sawa’iq al-Muhriqa page 333

    – Tafsir Mazhari v. 8. p. 434

    – Imam Barzanji in al-Isha’at

    – Qadi Abu Ya’la in Mu’tamad al-Usool ”

    Any one of these books is not written by Imam Ibne Hanbal(RA). Can u tell the vistors of this forum the gap between the death of Imam ibne Hanbal and the writer of the above books. Give the chain of Rawis who narrate the declaration of Imam Hanbal (RA). Keep in mind, in “declaration” and “opinion” a big difference.

  • Sher-e-Ghousia July 21, 2008 at 12:59 pm #

    You are right, none of these books are written by Imam ibn Hanbal (Radi Allahu Ta’ala Anhu).

    But, one major point here. These books are not ‘biographies’ like we have today. They are done through reports and chains of transmission.

    If the incident was mentioned in only one book then you might have had an argument. Because it is mentioned in several books, the narration is authentic.

    Due the the qiyas (analogy) and asl (proof) of this incident, one cannot deny it without solid evidences or arguments to counter it. The way the authenticity of these narrations are understood are similar to that of Usool-ul Hadith.

    Regarding the chain or transmission, I’m afraid don’t have access to these books as I only had access to them through a friend who used to studying an Alim course. I provided the name of the authors and the title of the books. So, if someone has access to them then they can see for themselves. If you ask any Scholar, they will tell you that the authors I have mentioned are great Scholars of hadith, so a few simple narrations is not beyond their comprehension.

    At least I have provided you the references. Perhaps you should do the same.

    Now, it’s your turn to answer a few questions.

    Whenever I ask you a question, most of the time you don’t answer it and instead just ask me questions instead. Since I have always answered your questions to the best of my ability, could you kindly answer my following questions?

    – You said “According to Hadith the Kuffar will return to the person who says some one kaffir without any evidence.” So does this also apply to the many pious Scholars who declared yazid a kaffir, such as Imam ibn Hanbal (Radi Allahu Ta’ala Anhu)?

    – Apart from Imam Al Ghazali (RA) can you name me even 5 Scholars from the first few hundred years of Islam who said “Radi Allahu Anhu” after Yazids name?

    – You said ““Dr Zakir has sound and authentic proofs and is not impressed by Shia views. He has given proofs that is enough for a person who is not blind follower.” How do you know his eveidences are not false like his blatant lie about Imam Ahmad Raza Khan’s (Rahmathullahi Ta’ala alay) fatawa? You ask me for chains of transmission but why don’t you ask the same question to Dr Naik?

    – You quoted Imam Al Ghazali. If you accept his words about Yazid, will you also accept his words that Sufism is good, Mawlid is permissible and so on? Before you give you answer, remember that Dr Naiks and Muhhamed ibn Abdul Wahhab’s “Shaykh ul Islam” Ibn Tammiyya and followers claim that Imam al Ghazali (Rahmathullahi Ta’ala alay) became mad. Allah Ta’ala Forbid.

    PS: In order for this conversation to proceed, I have asked you 5 (five) questions (above). If you fail the answer these questions in a straight manner and instead go on about something different, or don’t answer the question at all, then there is no reason for the conversation to carry on.

    Like all matters of life, if you have the answer and are right then you will provide it.

  • Talha Rafique July 23, 2008 at 3:54 pm #

    Your Question 1:
    You said “According to Hadith the Kuffar will return to the person who says some one kaffir without any evidence.” So does this also apply to the many pious Scholars who declared yazid a kaffir, such as Imam ibn Hanbal (Radi Allahu Ta’ala Anhu)?

    Answer: I don’t believe that Imam Ibne Hanbal(RA) said such a thing. It will be blame and Buhtan on him(RA). For a thing written in a many books is not necessary that he is true.
    For Example: ‘Ilm hasil kero kha tum ko Chin b jana peray.”
    is not a Hadith but just a Buhtan on Rasool-Allah (SAW).
    But even the people today read it without any hesitation and the is no Molvi who is trying to stop the Goverment from saying it Hadith.
    There are many Hadiths written in Abu Dawood and other
    good books that are week and Zaeef and not reliable.
    You people even cann’t proof of the all things ,all things,all things, all things, written about other Imams.
    First clear it that” Is it really the declaration or opinion of Imam(RA) or balme on him(RA).
    What you want is here: Keep in mind dear no body is exempted from Sharia.

  • Talha Rafique July 23, 2008 at 5:32 pm #

    ok
    Dear I am taking about your first Question;The point is that no body in the world has more worth than the holy Prophet (SAW) and his(SAW) Hadith. His(SAW) hadith is the revelation no his(SAW) desire. His Hadith is the Sharia and has authority. So
    Any Imam cann’t dare to speak against hadith if he got it but if he not got it according to hadith he has right to establish a temporary opinion.

    It will just remain a blame on Imam Ahmed bin Hanbal that he said abuot yazid( Bin Maveya (RA) ) such a wrong this. Can you proof it from his(RA) book Masnad Ahmed in which there also his(RA) opinions are present.
    Can you proof it from Ibn Maja?????????Can you proof it from Muta Imam Malik ?????Let us suppose Even if there is any opinion of any Imam is present in his own book, then even it is an opinion and if contradicting the authentic proofs
    which Imam couldn’t get in their life, it is not necessary for us to stick to his (RA) opinion. But it is according to the Imam’s order: If you see my saying against the Hadith, throw my saying to the wall and stick to the Hadith”It is the meaning of different Imams sayings.

  • Talha Rafique July 23, 2008 at 6:00 pm #

    Ans to 2nd Question:
    I don’t need to waste my time. It not the matter of salvation. If you have any solid proof you can present it. It is your dare to say
    a Muslim a Kaffir even your Ulmas stop themselves from saying Yazid bin Maveya a kaffir. Baray Mian so baray mian chootay mian SubhanALLAH. Even if all the world say a person
    a kaffir and he is muslime he don’t become kaffir. There are many Scholars not just five who are silent on this issue due to unauthentic proofs. Hadith is enough for me:
    Paradise will be granted to the first batch of my followers who will undertake a naval operation.� [Sahih Bukhari, Vol. 4 Book of Jihad Hadith 2924].
    Yazeed was also the commander of the Muslim army, which went to fight the battle of Constantinople, which was predicted by the Prophet pbuh.gif himself.

  • Talha Rafique July 23, 2008 at 6:10 pm #

    Ans to 3rd:
    Dr Zakir Naik told blatant truth about so called Ala Hazrat Fatwa that It is permissible to say Radi Allahu Ta’ala Anhu after the name of a Taabi or wali-ul-ALLAH. Definitely yazid bin Maveya was a Muslim and Taabi so it is also permisble for him.

  • Talha Rafique July 23, 2008 at 6:12 pm #

    Ans to 3rd: Are u need a chain of transmission for following hadith:
    Paradise will be granted to the first batch of my followers who will undertake a naval operation.� [Sahih Bukhari, Vol. 4 Book of Jihad Hadith 2924].

  • Talha Rafique July 23, 2008 at 6:21 pm #

    Ans to 4: Dear You believe in his words of suffiism so do hurry to accepts his words about yazid.
    Sufism and which part of suffism is present in islam and which is injected by distrayed people all this is a long discussion.

  • Talha Rafique July 23, 2008 at 6:32 pm #

    Ans to 4: It is possible that he(RA) became mad. Because he (RA) was not Prophet or Rab.
    Any way if they present proof of it, accept it otherwise keep silent. It is not matter of salvation for me or u to believe that he became mad or didn’t.

    PS: This forum is established to demoralize Dr Zakir Naik but
    Al-hadulillah he is become more popular and famous at international level. Alhamdulillah. Truth is truth. ponder and be cool.

  • Sher-e-Ghousia July 23, 2008 at 10:12 pm #

    Here is proof from some of the greatest Scholars. Now, try to reject all these:

    1. Hafiz Ibn Kathir’s comments on Yazeed:
    Ibn Kathir himself writes in the famous ‘Al Bidayah’:
    ‘Traditions inform us that Yazeed loved worldly vices, would drink, listen to kept the company of boys with no facial hair [civil _expression for paedophilia boys, a form of homosexuality], played drums, kept dogs [civil _expression for bestiality], not a day would go by when he was not in a drunken state.’
    2. Ibn Katheer in Al Bidayah Volume 8 page 222 stated:
    ‘Muslim was ordered to ransack Medina for three days. Yazeed committed a major sin. Sahaba and their children were slaughtered openly; other heinous acts were also perpetuated. We have already mentioned that he had Ibn Ziyad kill the grandson of Rasulullah (s) Husayn and his companions. In those three days in Madina, it is difficult to mention the type of acts that were carried out. By doing this act Yazeed wanted to secure his governance, in the same way Allah (swt) broke the neck of every Pharoah, the true King (swt) also broke the neck of Yazeed.’
    3. One who attacks Medina is cursed
    We read in al Bidaya Volume 8 page 223: ‘Rasulullah (s) said whoever perpetuated injustice and frightened the residents of Medina, the curse (la’nat) of Allah (swt), His Angels and all people is on such a person’
    4. Ibn Atheer’s comments on Yazeed
    In Tareekh al Kamil Volume 3 page 450 Ibn Atheer narrates from Munzir bin Zabeer: ‘Verily Yazeed rewarded me with 100,000 dirhams but this cannot stop me from highlighting his state, By Allah he is a drunkard…’
    5. Ibn Atheer’s comments on Yazeed
    In ‘Siyar A’lam Al-Nubala’ Volume 4 pages 37-38, Dhahabi narrates: ‘Ziyad Hurshee narrates ‘Yazeed gave me alcohol to drink, I had never drunk alcohol like that before and I enquired where he had obtained its ingredients’. Yazeed replied ‘it is made of sweet pomegranate, honey from Isfahan, sugar from Hawaz and grapes from Burdah…Yazeed indulged in alcohol and would participate in actions that opposed the dictates set by Allah (swt).’
    6. Ibn Jauzi’s comments on Yazeed ‘the drunkard’
    Ibn Jauzi in Wafa al-Wafa: ‘Yazeed appointed his cousin Uthman bin Muhammad bin Abu Sufyan as Governor of Madina. He sent a delegation to visit Yazeed who bore gifts so that they might take the oath of allegiance to him. Upon their return they said ‘We have returned having visited a man who has no religion, he drinks, plays instruments, keeps the company of singers and dogs [civil word for bestiality], we declare that we have broken our allegiance to him. Abdullah bin Abi Umro bin Hafs Mukhzumee commented ‘Yazeed gave me gifts. But the reality is this man is an enemy of Allah (SWT) and a drunkard. I shall separate myself from him in the same way that I remove my turban [from my head]….’
    7. Ibn Hajr’s comments on Yazeed
    In Sawaiqh al Muhriqa: ‘One group have deemed Yazeed to be a kaafir, another has stated he was a Muslim but a fasiq (transgressor), a fajir (one that commits debauchery) and a drunkard. There is consensus over his fisq (transgression). One party of Ulema have stated that you can curse him by name, this includes individuals such as Ibn Jauzi and Ahmad. One group made up of individuals such as Ibn Jauzi deem Yazeed a kaafir, others say he was not a kaafir but rather this is a matter that has caused a difference of opinion.
    The majority of Ahl’ul Sunnah all agree that he was a fasiq (transgressor), a fajir (one that commits debauchery) and a drunkard. Waqidi had recorded a narration ‘Verily we opposed Yazeed fearing Allah (swt) would reign stones down on us, Yazeed considered nikah (marriage) with mothers and sisters to be permissible and drank alcohol.’
    ‘Dhahabi narrates that when Abdullah bin Kuzai returned from Damascus he stated that Yazeed performs zina with his mother, sister and daughters. We had better start a movement to oppose Yazeed otherwise stones may reign down on us’
    This is one reason why Ibn Hajar al Makki calls Yazeed one of the most debased men in history.
    8. Muhaddith Shah Abdul Aziz’s comments on Yazeed
    In ‘Sirush Shahadhathayn’, Shah Abdul Aziz, the great Muhadith states: ‘Imam Husayn did not give baiah to Yazeed because he was a drunkard, a fasiq and Dhaalim.’
    9. Ibn Taymeeya’s condemnation of unjust Yazeed
    Ibn Taymeeya in Minhajj: ‘Yazeed had the sword and hence he had the power to deal with anyone that opposed him. He had the power to reward his subjects with the contents of the treasury, and could also withhold their rights. He had the power to punish criminals; it is in this context that we can understand that he was the khalifah and king. Issues such as Yazeed’s piety or lack of it, or his honesty or lack of it, is another matter. In all of his actions Yazeed was not just, there is no dispute amongst the people of Islam on this matter.’
    10. The World reknown Muslim Historian Ibn Khaldun states:
    ‘Yazeed’s time of governance can be seen as fisq and debauchery, and the blame is on Mu’awiya who should have controlled him.’
    11. We read in Tareekh Kamil:
    ‘The narrator states ‘By Allah, Yazeed drinks alcohol and abandons Salat’
    12. We read in Tareekh Abul Fida:
    ‘Yazeed played the tambourine, drank alcohol and raised bears [civil _expression for bestiality].’
    13. Hayaath al Haywaan states:
    ‘Yazeed would hunt with cheetas, play chess and drink alcohol.’
    14. People opposed Yazeed due to his atrocious deeds
    We read in Tareekh Khamees: ‘The people of Medina broke the baiah to Yazeed on account of his bad acts, he used to drink alcohol’
    15. The Famous Hanifa scholar Qadi Thanaullah’s comments on Yazeed’s kufr poetry
    We read in most famous Tafseer Al- Mazhari: ‘Yazeed deemed drinking alcohol to be Halaal, and he recited these couplets ‘if the Deen of Ahmad deems alcohol to be haraam…’
    16. Shariat Muhammad Majid ‘Ali Shakir stated in Badh Shariat:
    ‘Some say ‘Why should we discuss such a thing since he [Yazeed] was a King and he [Husayn] was also a King’ – one who makes such comments {refusing to hold opinion on Yazeed and Husayn (R)] is accursed, a Kharijee, Nasibi and hell bound. The dispute is over whether he [Yazeed] was a kaafir. The madhab of Abu Hanifa stipulates that he was a fasiq and fajir, nor was he a kaafir nor a Muslim.’
    17. Yazeed’s attack on Harra
    We read in ‘au khanar al masalik’ that Shaykh al Hadith Mawlana Muhammad Zakaria stated:
    ‘The army that Yazeed had sent to Medina comprised of 60,000 horsemen and 15,000 foot soldiers. For three days they shed blood freely, 1000 women were raped and 700 from the Quraysh and Ansar were killed. Ten thousand women and children were made slaves. Muslim bin Uqba forced people to give bayya to Yazeed in such a manner that people were enslaved and Yazeed could sell them as he pleased, no Sahaba who were [with the Prophet (saws)] at Hudaibiya were spared.’ All the Badr Sahaba were killed in this battle.
    18. Yazeeds rejection of the Qur’an
    Citing Tadhkira, Maqathil and Shazarath al Dhabah. This is also found in the Arabic (non-Leiden) version of the History of Al-Tabari: When the head of Husayn (R), the grandson of the Holy Prophet (saws), was presented before Yazeed he recited the couplets of the kaafir Zubayri:
    ‘Banu Hashim staged a play for Kingdom there was no news from the skies neither was there any revelation’
    19. Imam Alusi In Tafseer Ruh al Maani it is stated clearly:
    ‘Allamah Alusi stated, Yazeed the impure denied the Prophethood of Rasulullah (s). The treatment that he meted out to the people of Makka, Medina and the family of the Prophet proves that he was a kaafir.’
    Point references:
    1. Al Bidayah wa al Nihayah Volume 8 page 204 Dhikr Ras al Husayn
    2. Minhajj al Sunnah Volume 2 page 249 Dkikr Yazeed
    3. Sharh Foqh Akbar page 73 Dhikr Yazeed
    4. Sharh Tafseer Mazhari Volume 5 page 21 Surah Ibrahim
    5. Shazrah al Dhahab page 69 Dhikr Shahadth Husayn
    6. Maqatahil Husayn Volume 2 page 58 Dhikr Shahdath Husayn
    7. Tadhkira Khawwas page 148
    8. Tareekh Tabari Volume 11 pages 21-23 Dhikr 284 Hijri
    9. Tafseer Ruh al Ma’ani (commentary of Surah Muhammad)
    10. Ibn Kathir in al Bidaya wa al Nihaya Volume 8 page 231 narrates this hadith on the authority of

  • Sher-e-Ghousia July 23, 2008 at 10:12 pm #

    “I don’t believe that Imam Ibne Hanbal(RA) said such a thing.”

    Why are you giving your opinion? Either reject it with authentic proof or accept it. I also said “many Scholars” but you only pointed out one Scholar.

    As I have said before, “If the incident was mentioned in only one book then you might have had an argument. Because it is mentioned in several books, the narration is authentic.”

    “There are many Scholars not just five who are silent”

    I didn’t ask you if Scholars stayed quiet, but specifically asked you to name 5 Scholars who said “Radi Allahu Anhu” after Yazids name.

    About the battle of consinople, if you read you history you will know exactly how and why Yazid went to the battlefield.

    “Dr Zakir Naik told blatant truth about so called Ala Hazrat Fatwa that It is permissible to say Radi Allahu Ta’ala Anhu after the name of a Taabi or wali-ul-ALLAH. “

    Why are you lying? AlaHazrat (RA) said you can say Radi Allahu Ta’ala Anhu after the name of a Taabi or wali-ul-ALLAH, and that is correct. But AlaHazrat (RA) never said you can say it for Yazid. Remember one thing, AlaHazrat (RA) never ever praised Yazid.

    “Dear You believe in his words of suffiism so do hurry to accepts his words about yazid.”

    Why have you not answered my question?

    “It is possible that he(RA) became mad. Because he (RA) was not Prophet or Rab.

    Again, you have not fully answered my question.

  • Sher-e-Ghousia July 23, 2008 at 10:25 pm #

    So, let’s summarise:

    – The first question about kuffr, you only mentioned one Scholar and didn’t answer the question fully

    – I asked you to name 5 Scholars from the first few hundred years of Islam who said “Radi Allahu Anhu” after Yazids name and you failed to do so

    – Even after knowing the lies of Dr Naik over AlaHazrat’s fatwa you still can’t admit Dr Naiks mistake and yet again did not answer my question properly.

    – Regarding Imam al Ghazali (RA), you did not answer my question properly but instead asked me a question back.

    You have clearly shown your blind following and will even criticise other just to falsely defend Dr Naik.

    As I said before, “If you fail the answer these questions in a straight manner and instead go on about something different, or don’t answer the question at all, then there is no reason for the conversation to carry on.”

    There is no reason for me to carry on this circus. You cannot give proper answers with evidences. Quoting an isolated Hadith without any commentary from Scholars of Hadith shows you ignorance. If you read your history you won’t even have the nerve to mention some of the things you have said. I will admit that certain Scholars have made mistakes. For example, One great Scholar said the Day of Judgement is going to happen in 1900 (AD) but it didn’t happen. But no one tries to lie to defend him. But, even with all the evidences and backing of most of the Scholars you still are blinded by your link with Dr Naik and can’t accept his mistakes.

    Remember, Allah Ta’ala says: Then, do you expect that if you were given the rule of the land to cause evil and mischief on earth and severe the bonds of kinship? These are the ones whom Allāh has cursed and made them deaf and blinded their sight’

    I will leave this to you brothers (and maybe sisters).

    Please excuse me if I have offended anyone.

    Allah Hafiz

  • Sher-e-Ghousia July 24, 2008 at 11:14 am #

    One of my teachers was right. You can provide evidence after evidence and win these people in many arguments, but some people will still remain blind and will continue to walk on the wrong path.

    Me and my fellow brothers are trying to defend the Honour of Imam al Hussain (Radi Allahu Anhu). But Talha and his freinds are more interested in defending Dr Naik over the honour of Imam al Hussain (Radi Allahu Anhu). Disgraceful!

    I’ll leave with this statement by brother Talha Rafique, which is a great example of Dr Naiks fans ignorance, arrogance, crude approach and over indulgence:

    “This forum is established to demoralize Dr Zakir Naik but
    Al-hamdulillah he is become more popular and famous at international level. Alhamdulillah. Truth is truth. ponder and be cool.”

    PS: This is my final post.

  • ZAKIR Answers Back July 26, 2008 at 8:37 pm #

    Reply by Dr.Zakir Naik on Karbala and Yazeed(r.a) on 13 July 2008. Refer to the link below..

    PART-1

    PART-2

    Zakir Naik is challenging Kirmani (I think the president of Khoja Jammat) to Debate with him but Kirmani has refused..

    SO CALL ANY OF YOUR TOP SCHOLAR WHO CAN ATTRACT 10,000 AUDIENCE AND ASK THEM TO ORAGANISE THE DEBATE. DR.ZAKIR NAIK WILL DEBATE.

    THEN WHOLE MUSLIM UMMAH WILL SEE WHO IS TELLING THE TRUTH.

  • nasim ali July 26, 2008 at 10:53 pm #

    zakir brother, i allways watch your programmes on tv, what i hear is the truth. allhamdulillah allah protect you , allah will inshalla allah will disgrace the trouble makers

  • Talha Rafique July 28, 2008 at 3:41 pm #

    Let us suppose according to you (Sher) all the evils were present in yazid bin Maveya(RA), even then you cann’t say a Muslim( believing Quran and Sunnah, accepting Prophet(SAW) the last messenger) a kaffir. So you should repent to Allaha Almighty. May be Yazeed bin Maveya(RA) was better than todays muslims. He was surely better than the today’s worshipers of grave and shrines.
    All above mentioned references given by Sher have what faults and what meanings and have what sense will be answered by the Great Scholar Dr. Zakir Naik. Time will tell who
    is wrong and who is right.

  • Talha Rafique July 28, 2008 at 5:42 pm #

    Zakir Naik is challenging Kirmani (I think the president of Khoja Jammat) to Debate with him but Kirmani has refused..

    SO CALL ANY OF YOUR TOP SCHOLAR WHO CAN ATTRACT 10,000 AUDIENCE AND ASK THEM TO ORAGANISE THE DEBATE. DR.ZAKIR NAIK WILL DEBATE.

    THEN WHOLE MUSLIM UMMAH WILL SEE WHO IS TELLING THE TRUTH.

  • mujtaba August 18, 2008 at 9:17 pm #

    dr.zakir naik said just rubbish. yazeed is jahanami.

  • ламинат August 24, 2008 at 10:06 pm #

    7pThank’s for greate post.7g I compleatly agree with last post. fmr
    ламинат купить 7b

  • Sher-e-Ghousia August 26, 2008 at 9:38 pm #

    Shaykh Zille-Umar Qadri, a student of Shaykh ul Islam Tahir ul Qadri challenges Dr Zakir Naik:

    http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=RK5hZjUsfNA

    http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=TtCySeRo0go

    Dr Naik has got his challenge. Now its up to him to accept it.

  • NAIK(The HeRo) August 31, 2008 at 8:50 am #

    Zille-Umar Qadri quoted IMAM GHAZALI(r.a) that he said “u should not say anything of which u don’t possess any knowledge” For his information IMAM GHAZALI also said that “ANYONE WHO THINKS THAT YAZID ORDERED THE KILLING OF HUSAIN OR LIKED THE KILLING OF HUSAIN SUCH A PERSON IS ABSOLUTELY FOOL. . . . . . . . .” and he also said that to say “MAY ALLAH BE PLEASED WITH HIM” referring to Yazeed is RECOMMENDED. Definetly IMAM GHAZALI had the knowledge on this issue thats why he said this otherwise it will contradict his(Imam Ghazali’s) own statement..so Imam Ghazali also praised Yazeed but Zille-Umar Qadri still said (R.A) after Imam Ghazali’s name why??

  • faisal August 31, 2008 at 10:41 am #

    what is this brother zakir nike THAT you sya yazid may please with him

  • Sher-e-Ghousia August 31, 2008 at 4:36 pm #

    NAIK(The HeRo of the naive and the foolish),

    Please keep your opinions to yourself as we are allergic to such ignorance.

    Dr Naik wanted a challenge and now he has one. Noor TV is broadcast around the world, so Dr Naiks supporters cannot say “we didn’t know anything about the challenge”.

    The ball is now in Dr Naiks court.

  • NAIK(The ZeRo) September 1, 2008 at 2:17 pm #

    ………. u don’t have any answer to my Question.. where did I presented my opinion I only quoted Imam Ghazali statement on Yazeed..A scholar who I think Zille Umar Qadri holds in high regards..so please let me know what ignorance did I wrote in my previous post..
    And for ur information I knew this before u posted here that some muslim scholar i.e Zille Umar Qadri has asked Dr.Zakir Naik to have a Dialouge on this issue (on a tv channel). He is a student of TAHIR QADRI so I can assume what will be his arguments..did u hear that video of Zakir Naik (Reply on Yazeed in Italy) where he said that he debates a person who is powerful i.e who can attract 10,000 live audience on his own without using Zakir Naik viewership..Definetly anyone who debates with Zakir Naik will get attention of the people even he happens to be a stranger and large number of people will come to listen the Dialouge only bcoz Zakir Naik is involved in it..If Zille Umar Qadri debates any normal muslim scholar on this issue he will definelty struggle to get only 1,000 people forget 10,000 people. so is he upto that..

    And the second condition was that the person should organise the debate..so if he can fullfill those conditions than I am sure Zakir Naik will debate but personally I think when Zakir Naik will know that Z..U.Qadri is a student of Tahir.U.Qadri then he would like to debate Tahir-ul-Qadri rather his student and thats sounds appropriate bcoz I think Tahir-ul-Qadri can fullfill the first condition i.e of “audience” and he is a known personality to the muslim world (far better than Zille Umar Qadri) and it is better that his teacher i.e T.H.Qadri present his arguments rather his student but If Zille Umar Qadri will debate then I can tell u that Zakir naik will send his student to debate with him as he said in his response(Italy)..(Student VS Student)

  • Sher-e-Ghousia September 1, 2008 at 11:08 pm #

    What nonsense!

    I have quoted many Scholars (who lived before Imam al Ghazali). But, you just quote one scholar and somehow seem to think all is good. Learn the sciences of the various disciplines before you go on such a rampage.

    Now moving on, back to our main focus of discussion.

    The issue of getting an audience of 10,000 is just plain ignorance. Well, by reading at the nonsense of some his supporters, it’s not so surprising. This is not a popularity contest. The objective here is to have a discussion/debate.

    Sure, you and Dr Naik can concentrate on “getting attention”. Shaykh Zille-Umar Qadri and the lovers of the Ahle Bayt (AS) will concentrate on Defending Imam Hussain (radi Allahu Ta’ala anhu).

    Shaykh Zille-Umar Qadr has provided the challenge and it is up to Dr Naik to accept. Nothing can be set up untill Dr Naik says ‘yes’. Once Dr Naik gets in contact and accepts, then we will see what happens.

  • Jimmy September 1, 2008 at 11:32 pm #

    U Can’t Digest the TRUTH thats why u change my name..I caught Zile Umar Qadri on the wrong foot when he said r.a after Imam Ghazali name who also praised Yazeed and to which u have no explanaition..calling other IGNORANT is a very good excuse if u don’t have any argument left.

    ……….Zille Umar Qadri wants to debate ZAKIR NAIK..lol. Zakir Naik will not waste his time debating such KIDS..

    Quran Ch.17:V:81 And say, “Truth has come, and falsehood has departed. Indeed is falsehood, [by nature], ever bound to depart.”

    I bet u will again do the same i.e change what I wrote ………..

    Note-None will be allowed to be Oversmart here as forum asks ur Personal name .You are Inserting others name so either write ur name or keep Silent.
    *Zakir Naik has Insulted Hazrat Hussain R.A and whatever his Popularity in the Modern audiences of MTV may be, will surely get Punishment on the Day of Judgement.

    *May Allah reward him what he deserve….
    * Stick to the topic and Use Decent Language.*****FINALWarning*****
    By-Shahnawaz Warsi

  • Sher-e-Ghousia September 2, 2008 at 10:55 pm #

    Shaykh Zille-Umar Qadri and all Sunni Muslims respect Imam al Ghazal (Rahmathullahi Ta’ala alay), so there is nothing to catch here. You simply don’t know your facts. If that isn’t ignorance, then what is?

    Imam al Ghazali (Rahmathullahi Ta’ala alay) made a mistake, simple as.

    It is funny that Dr Naik and his fans keep going on about Imam al Ghazal (RA). Didn’t Dr Naiks “Shaykh ul Islam” Ibn Tammiyya and followers claim Imam al Ghazali (Rahmathullahi Ta’ala alay) became mad? Astagfirrullah! Allah Forbid.

    According to the Islamic principals and sciences, you cannot use the words, works and narrations of someone who is mad. So, on one hand Dr Naik’s Shayks criticise Imam al Ghazali (Rahmathullahi Ta’ala alay), but just to protect themselves they start using his works. Isn’t that hypocritical?

    “Zille Umar Qadri wants to debate ZAKIR NAIK..lol. Zakir Naik will not waste his time debating such KIDS..”

    Do you know Shaykh Zille-Umar Qadri? If not, then how can you come to such a conclusion. Shaykh Zille-Umar Qadri has studied under some of the greatest teachers on the planet. To dismiss him so easily just shows what sort of adhab you people have for the Scholars.

    I have written many posts here, but show me one place where I have used such childish words to mock Dr Naik on a personal level like you have with Shaykh Zille-Umar Qadri.

    As Shaykh Zille-Umar Qadri says, Dr Naik is one of the best in the field of comparative religion, but when it come to matters regarding Fiqh, Aqida and so on, Dr Naik is not learned in these areas.

  • Muhammad Furqan Haider September 6, 2008 at 9:42 pm #

    Salam,
    I am a shia muslim and I believe that Zakir naik is doing an excellent job to unite muslim and making them realize their duty towards Allah and Islam..moreover we are fighting on that he said hazrat with name of Yazeed maloon…so he is at mistake he should correct himself..thats all.it his faith…afterall he is doing a great job to unite the muslims and calling non-muslims toward the true religion

  • sanullah September 7, 2008 at 9:39 pm #

    i dont know y shias r using bad word about the greatest companion of muhammad {saw}i think they r kafir kafir mean inkar karna they dont accept that abu bkr raziallah is the greatest companion of prophet and they abuses him shias r the worst enemy of muslim we better aware of it we sunni muslim never abuse any ali hussein and hassan beacuse they r relatives of our prophet [pbuh] so they must see that sahabas r companion and the true follower of islam s
    sirf ya Allah madad

  • Sher-e-Ghousia September 8, 2008 at 3:01 pm #

    Wonder why the website of Dr Naiks article is closed?

  • Xain September 9, 2008 at 7:06 am #

    The reason of this coward sending student to Zaki Baqri is that he can not face him himself. The day he agrees to debate himself, Allama Zaki Baqri will do all the booking

  • M.Fahim September 14, 2008 at 6:33 pm #

    Salamz,
    I just want to say that if (suppose)a debate between Dr.Zakir Naik and Mr.Zaki Baqri is held,
    and ,of course,one of them will win.
    but keep in mind in both the cases(either N or B)
    the islam will lose.
    in urdu saying:
    (CHAHE KHARBOOZA CHURI PER GIRE YA CHURI KHARBOOZE PER GIRE KATNA KHARBOOZE HI KO HAI)

  • Abdullah Khan September 15, 2008 at 3:18 pm #

    Dr.Zakir Naik is a very good islamic speaker,it is because of him that many muslims are realising their duty of propagating islam .He is one of the few scholars who have a command over not only Islam but also other comparative religions.I don’t know why there is a hue and cry among people about his Aqeedah and all.I think that many people are jealous of him and that is the reason they are trying to malign him.

  • zafar September 17, 2008 at 10:19 am #

    Dr. Zakir Naik is one of the renowned muslim scholar who has great spirit of extending and defending islam due to his vast knowledge about islam and other religoins also….

    he goes up towards his acheivemnts in extending islam…i am much impressed about his speeches and defending views and more than that the coursage to challlenge to some one who argue about islam…ISLAM IS PURELY THE RELIGION OF PEACE…..not anything else..

  • Ali Affan Yaqoob September 21, 2008 at 12:34 pm #

    As salam o alaikum

    wah yar bara afsos hua yeh jaan ker k naoz o billah ALLAH SUBHAN O TAALA ne jannat aur jahannum ki entry ka theka logon ko de diya hai jo k history ki books (jis main khud contradictions hain:see albadaya al wanahiiya main ibn e kathir ki mashoor e zama Mohammad bin Hanfia(RUA) wali riwayat.aba agar koi na manna chahay tau kiya kiya ja sakta hai) le ker kisi ko bhi jahannum main daal saktay hain.yar agar tum logon ko lagta hai k tumhe ya tumhare alimon ko yeh authority mil gayi hai tau Sahih Bukhari main ja ker us shaks ka waqiya perho jis ne 100 logon ko qatal kiya tha lekin ALLAH SUBHAN O TAALA ne usey bakhsh diya tha aur phir khud sachay dil se sochna k agar woh tum logon k paas aata is halat main k us ne 100 qatal kiye hotay kiya tum usey jannat main bhejtey ya jahannum main??????

    ALLAH SUBHAN O TAALA k jo kaam hai woh unhin ko kerne do bhaiyon bas US REHMAN O RAHEEM ki ibadat kerte raho, logon k saath achay tareqay se pesh aatay raho aur aik dosre ko duayen dete raho aur ALLAH SUBHAN O TAALA k ahkaam poray kerte raho aur fitnon se dorr raho aur US REHMAN O RAHEEM se bakhshish talb kerte raho.apni fikar kero jannat aur jahannum ki na k kisi aur ki.

    FEAMANILLAH
    As salam o alaikum

  • Raza September 22, 2008 at 7:26 pm #

    well no shia minded Dr zakir naik’s popularity before he praised yazeed ,Shias had nothing to do with Dr zakir naik’s personality they only say yazeed is a sinner and his followers and favourers are also sinner bcaz yazeed killed the grandson of our Holy Prophet, Either u r with Hazrat Hussain (Grandson of Holy Prophet) or ur with Yazeed choiice is urs best of luck ….u will need it

  • Dr.mustafa Sadiq September 27, 2008 at 12:55 pm #

    Assalam o alaikom everyone.first of all i would like to say that we the muslims are not in a condition to criticize each other.we must b united in this era to spread the message of Allah subhana wa taala in a graceful way.i m a bosom listener and follower of Dr.Zakir Naik.i don’t have words to appreciate his works in making islam glow when it comes to comparative religions.God bless him and may he live long to carry on his works.we should invite other people to islam in the way we r supposed to.we r not meant to expel people from the islamic circle in the way we r not meant to.first of all we should think and see that Dr.Zakir is at least guiding people towards the right path.first of all it must b praised.everyone has his own thinking and beliefs about the deep things.we must not oppose each other in having different beliefs.if someone says that Allah is one and Muhmmad S.A.W is His last messenger,he is supposed to b a muslim.so we the muslims must not degrade each other in these things.we should just support the preachers and invite the people towards islam.i humbly request everyone PLZZZ 4 ALLAH’S SAKE DON’T EVER TRY TO DEGRADE DR.ZAKIR NAIK.He is a man of immense knowledge.the work he has donealone 4 islam is more than the work collectively done by all muslim muslim umma in last 50 years.plz support Dr.Zakir and IRF.may Allah guide all of us towards the right path.plzzz everyone reading my passage i request all of u to listen to Dr.Zakir Naik’s lectures completely.u will b guided towards islam in a true way.plzz come to salaah and don’t forget that we have to die one day.

  • sharique raza September 29, 2008 at 5:37 pm #

    i accept dat zakir naik is good preacher,but at d same time he is breaking d law of ISLAM.according to me he is kafir.

  • Mansoor Danish October 1, 2008 at 10:53 am #

    My Dear Brethren,
    It astonishes me no end that this Yazeed-issue- thread has been running for the last 9 months and we have had people from the Sunni clan and the Shia clan come forward and pass remarks, some pass a judgement, some criticize and then leave the thread for some one else to take forward.
    I am no different–
    Lets agree that it is historically established that the first head of Muslim state of affairs after the demise of Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him was Abu Bakr as Siddique. Let us also acknowledge that after him two men by the name of Umar Ibn Khattab and Usman Ibn Affan controlled the affairs. In this period, Hazrat Ali, not once stood up and revolted against their caliphate. Infact, he served as ajudge in the court of HazratUmar and held responsible and respectable position each time till he proceeded to become a Caliph.
    Hzrat Ali’s caliphate was marred with turbulent times in Islamic History. Allah swt says in Sur Baqrah, that He shall try each one of us with His fruits.. and Hazrat Ali, the beloved son in law of our last Prophet peace be upon him was no different. Allah swt rewarded Hazrat Ali with the most challenging of times to test him in the ways that only Allah swt knows best.

    Hazrat Ali radiallahu anha was a Muslim.He had the same tag like the three Khalifas before him and the same tag which the Prophet bore on his chest proudly. They were all pious Muslims and should be respected and revered by one and all. When they didnt contradict each other, we have no indiviuality to get into this argument of who is the greatest of the four. Islam is complete the day Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him was sent on the face of this earth and we need to follow Islam according to the Qura’an and the teachings of the Prophet sal allahu alayhi wassalam.

    Cmoing to the Yazeed issue.. and Dr Zakir Naik’s statement. Whatever statement he made was his own opinion based on certin understandings given to him. Whether right or wrong- Allah swt will not question me on the Final Day. Neither will Allah swt ask me for my opinion on the martyrdom of Hazrat Hussain radiallahu anha nor will he ask me for my verdict on Yazeed and the Caliphate issue. That day we shall all be under Allah’s mercy. Each soul shall have a taste of death and each of us will get a Final recompense. So let us leave these judgments forAllah swt to pronounce.

    Dr zakir Naik is one of the most outstanding student of Islam in the field of Dawah. I Repeat and urgemy brothers that Dr Zakir Naik is not a SCHOLAR. He is a student of Islam ad one who has given more to Islam, more to Allah swt and his Rasul than all of us here posting mesgs in this room. A cmment on Yazeed, might infuriate a few, so leave that aside. Dr Zakir will be answerable to Allah swt if he is incorrect or utters a word of sin. Let us nt start holding his opinion as a legal fatwa and imprison our logic. We areall learned and educate dpeople. We know what is right and worng for ourselves. If you feel something is TOO HEAVY for you to digest- please eschew it. But let us not get into the fitanh of dividing the community into two

    We all are Muslims. Let us come together and stand united as aMuslim lest we be broken up by our enemies into fragments.

    WaAkhiru dwana anil hamdu lillahi rabbil alameen

  • Sher-e-Ghousia October 2, 2008 at 10:48 pm #

    Mansoor Danish,

    The problem here is that Dr Naik is too stubborn to accept his mistake(s). Therefore, the youth and the naive are being misled into thinking yazid (Allah’s curse be on him) is a good person and the battle was “political”.

    Look at the following clip for example:

    http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=4c0P4YXiBUI&feature=related

    As one great Shaykh once said: “You can pray all night and day, but if you insult Allah Ta’ala, the Beloved Prophet (sall’Allalhu alayhi wa’alahi wa’sallam), the Companions or the Ahle Bayt, all your good deeds will burn in the hell fire and the doors of Paradise will be shut for you.”

    He then went on to say: “Someone who doesn’t pray much but has love for Allah Ta’ala, the Beloved Prophet (sall’Allalhu alayhi wa’alahi wa’sallam), the Companions and the Ahle Bayt, the door (of Paradise) is still open for him. All he has to do is walk through it (i.e good deeds).”

  • Jasim Alam October 3, 2008 at 5:01 pm #

    As salaam u alaikum bhai,
    The challenge given by Zakir Naik will be fruitful. Insha Allah.

  • Syed Raza October 4, 2008 at 3:12 pm #

    Imamat and khilafat comes from Allah it is not the matter of ellecting any one

    In quran Allah revises the story of jews when they were living all together but no one is head of their tribes, then all tribes men ask Hazrat Sameer (Sameul) (Prophet/Priest) of that time to ask Allah for a leader among us, so Allah replied to him and Saul bacame the king, After him his son in law HAzrat Dawood (DAvid) made the king,after him his son soleman was made king.

    now i wanto ask are muslims dont have any sense or they are worst than jews of that time who accepts Allah’s decision but they didn’t and became rebillious

  • Syed Raza October 4, 2008 at 3:24 pm #

    Surah 8, Ayat 41 says ” And know that whatever of war-booty (Mal-e-Ganimat) that you may gain, verily one-fifthe (1/5th) of its assigned to Allah, and to the messenger, and to the near relatives (of Muhammad S.A.W.),the orphans,Al-masakin,and the wayfarer,if you have belived in Allah and in that which we sent down to our slaves (Muhammad S.A.W.) on the criterion (between right and wrong ), the day when two forces met,And Allah is able to do all things.

    Question:- Any khalifa acted upon this Ayat? and gave part of Mal-e-ganimat to the near relatives of Muhammad S.A.W. ? if not than according to this ayat they all were Munkar And Kafir

  • Syed Raza October 4, 2008 at 3:32 pm #

    There is only one way of uniting all muslims i.e. “they all should united under a leader which has been choosen by Allah not elected by the will of humans”

    just like Allah chooses Ali al Murtaza (R.A.) after Muhammad S.A.W. at Ghadeer, but due to the humans ill will they didnt accepted that decision, due to that mistake All muslims are scattering on the map of world.

    now to unite once again we need Imam mehdi A.S.

  • Syed Raza October 4, 2008 at 3:55 pm #

    Surah 17, Ayat mubarak 71 : “(And remember) the day when we shall call together all human beings with their (respective) Imam. so who so ever is given his record in his right hand, such will read their records, and they will not be dealt with injustice.”

    So my Imam and Khalifa are Muhammad S.A.W. HAzrat Ali (A.S.), Hazrat Imam Hassan, hazrat imam hussain,hazrat imam zainul abideen,imam baqir,imam Jaffer Sadiq,imam Ali Raza,Imam Mosa Kazim,Imam Taqi,Imam Naqi, imam Hassan Askari and Imam Mehdi (A.S.), nor more than them. and i would like to stand with them on Qayamat.

  • humayun lahore October 6, 2008 at 8:47 pm #

    i believe that the traditional mullas are afraid of zakir’s popularity….mulas only know how to respect islamic personalities and abuse yazeed
    mulas are unable to present a scientific picture of islam

  • Sher-e-Ghousia October 7, 2008 at 10:10 pm #

    humayun lahore,

    Try to show more respect towards the Ulema.

    When did Islam become a popularity contest?

    The Shia leader Ayotholla Khomeni is one the most famous personalities in Islam. Does that mean we should accept his corrupt beliefs? Obviously not!

    Your point about scientifically presenting Islam is slightly flawed. Ask yourself, why has the Philippines got the highest population of Muslims. Why has Bangladesh got so many Muslim?

    The answer here is not science, but respect of Islamic personalities. The spread of Islam in the Philippines was driven by increasing trade links. People converted to Islam after seeing the great morals and good character in these tradesmen. Many of these tradesmen were from the famous ‘Alawi’ family. The spread in Bangladesh was due to the character of Hazrat Baba Shah Jalal (Alayhi Rahma).

    How did Kwaja Moin’Uddin Chist Ajmeri (Alayhi Rahma) convert nearly 10 million people? Simple; through good character and respect.

    If Dr Naik cannot even show proper respect towards the Grandson of al Nabi al-azam (sall’Allalhu alayhi wa’alahi wa’sallam), then what use is science?

    I don’t want start ‘this person is better than this person’ but the works of Harun Yahya are actually far more articulate, and academically and scientifically superior to Dr naiks work. However, you never hear his ‘fans’ or ‘supporters’ say “traditional mullas are afraid of his popularity” and other ridiculous comments which are against the spirit of Islam.

    Ref:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hazrat_Shah_Jalal

    (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_in_Indonesia#The_spread_of_Islam_.281200_-_1600.29)

    PS: Instead of going into a wild tirade, perhaps a more constructive approach might yield more insight into your opinions and objectives.

  • Syed Raza October 8, 2008 at 4:16 am #

    @ Humayun: –
    Islam doesnt depends on Science, Science will not help us on qayamat. if it does than the biggest scientiest of all times like Isaac Newton and Albert Einstien will be first to go in paradise.
    question regarding Scientific picture of islam, Muslims do not need scientific reasons to believe in one Allah, and all his creations, they have to believe without any argurement just like first few people who accepted just after revelation of first ayat i.e. “Iqra bismikalzi khalaq”

  • Syed Raza October 8, 2008 at 4:25 am #

    Moreover Mr. Zakir Naik’s speeches are usually sense less, mis interpreting, not giving answers in the context of the questioner and would recommend the person who is seeking the truth should research in his own way. and internet is an ocean of information, you can research on your own, but first read the quran in your own language it will certainly help u alot. the decison will be yours

  • Hayah Zahir October 8, 2008 at 11:44 pm #

    Masha’Allah Sher-e-Ghousia on your knowledge and the patience with which you represent your thoughts and proper evidences. I applaud your efforts!

    I have been unsuccessfully trying to explain this to many other people, I just have one question, can I reproduce your posts elsewhere?

    May Allah reward you for your efforts, insha’Allah!

  • Rajendra Nath October 9, 2008 at 12:13 pm #

    Muslims are fighting each other? Do you know what is Islam? It is the submission to Allah. There is no Priests or authority in Islam. I feel shame that some notorious scholors and leaders are trying to insult Islam for their own sake.

  • Sher-e-Ghousia October 11, 2008 at 4:15 pm #

    Hayah Zahir,

    Although my effort is poor, you can use it elsewhere. Insha’Allah Aza wa’jal.

    This paragraph is very interesting:

    “Although Hazrat Khwaja Moinuddin Chisti (radi Allahu anhu) did not know the language of Hindustan because he spoke Persian, he converted about nine and a half million into the folds of Islam. Hazrat Khwaja Moinuddin Chisti (radi Allahu anhu) did not conquer India with his sword but with love.”

    http://www.ummah.net/Al_adaab/ahlibayt/sultan_hind.html

  • hussein October 15, 2008 at 12:52 pm #

    Allah says in the Quran
    Do you then have the sign that if you get the authority, spread disorder in the land and sever your ties of Kinship? These are they whom Allah has cursed and made them deaf from the truth and made their eyes blind. (47:22-23),
    Is there any greater fasad than the murdering of Husayn?
    So Yazeed is cursed by the Quran, why should you not?
    If your grandson is killed by Y, will you bless him?
    So why should a Muslim say radhi Allahu an for Yazeed who killed Prophet’s grandson. Is your granson more than the Prohet’s?
    Reason, use i. Iman, show, it.
    I am a Sunni, but I will always curse Yazeed bin Muawiyah, laanat on him and those who praise him, and will never ever pray for mercy on Yazeed and those who are his modern day confederates.
    Read history, did not Yazeed;s commander siege Medina, make the Prophet;s Masjid a horse stable for three days and nights, with no salat in the masjid?Desecreation of the Prohet;s masjid is worse than the rape of your mother.Where is your Iman, where is your honour?
    er.

  • Sher-e-Ghousia October 16, 2008 at 11:01 am #

    Shahnawaz warsi Sahib, would it be possible for you to remove the large comments made by ALI JAN. They don’t add to anything but only acts as a distraction for those wishing to read through the genuine user comments.

  • Shahnawaz warsi October 16, 2008 at 2:26 pm #

    Assalamolaikum..

    Dear Merazul I have removed many comments..it was really hectic and they were Just Copy pastings..thnx..

    Keep posting..if u need Password i may give it to u..that will be helpful.

    jazakAllah

  • Sher-e-Ghousia October 16, 2008 at 5:19 pm #

    Jazak’Allahu khayran

  • Mansoor Danish October 18, 2008 at 5:29 pm #

    Assalam u Alaikum Dear Brethren in Islam…

    We have been wasting our time over here debating, fighting, exchanging views which will not matter us in Akhirah..

    Allah swt has given us all a job of propagating His Deen. Its a shame, instead of spreading our religion, we are dividing ourselves into different sects…

    I want to know from all those reading this comment… What was the Deen on Ali Radiallahu anha.. What was the deen of Abu Bakar radiallahu anha, Umar and Usman radi allahu anhuma???

    They were all Muslims and all were ready to die for the deen Islam… But here are we fools, wasting our time… breaking ourselves into different sects.. Allah subhan watalla says in the Qur’an- Hold to the Rope of Allah- THE GLORIOUS QUR’AN and be not divided amongst yourselves… and we have divided ourselves, going against the command of Allah… We have been busy trying to talk about our heroes and praise our heroes when it is Allah whom we should be praising, Allah whom we should be listening to… and Allah swt commans us to do Dawah of the faith but we are too scared… The bloody rubbish that we are…Sitting like a dead duck,m fighting over petty matters… Like one gentleman said in one of the post..we need Imam Mahdi alayhis salam to free us… fie on us that we allow that thought to come into our head… weshould be doing our job and not waiting for the Mahdi..The Mahdi and the Isa will come when Allah wills, but for now we need to stand up and listen to what Allah is telling us… and to know what he is telling us we need to read the Qur’an, which we are not reading…

    My advise to my brother…Read the Qur’an with meaning and understanding..and let us not get into silly Shia Sunni fight….Lwet us all hold to the rope of Allah and InshAllah we will be united… No Mahdi, No Isa, No Ali, No Umar can unite us but Allah…and Allah can unite us if we hold to his rope- which is the Quran…

    Waakhiru dwana anil hamdu lillahi rabbil alameen

  • Sher-e-Ghousia October 19, 2008 at 5:03 pm #

    Walaykum as’salaam,

    Your intentions may be pure but your analysis is way off.

    No one is dividing Islam into sects. Islam was divided into sects from the time of the Salaf. If defending the truth is dividing us, then it is a crime I plead guilty to and am proud of.

    “fighting over petty matters”

    We are not fighting over petty matters, but are defending the honour of Imam Hussain (radi Allahu Ta’ala anhu). If you (and others) believe Imam Hussain (radi Allahu Ta’ala anhu) is not worth talking about then the situation within the Ummah is worse than I first thought.

    PS: This post is not about a Sunni Vs Shia debate. It was created to defend the honour of Imam Hussain (radi Allahu Ta’ala anhu).

  • mani October 22, 2008 at 5:14 am #

    sher-e-ghousia.

    answer my these question, what is your openion on war between hz. ali ra and hz. ayesha ra (as well aware that hz. ayesha ra was from ahlul bait as per quran read sura al-ahzab para 22) also what you say about war between hz. ali ra and hz. amir muayiah ra.

    you know who was right or wrong.

    you are half shia coz shia crusing every one who oppose ali ra.

    also where did mentioned in quran, hadith and other islamic books that it is necessary to hate “yazeed” it is faraj (necessary) we have to hate “yazeed”.

    why not like shia hate all persons who oppose ali ra.

  • Mansoor Danish October 22, 2008 at 5:15 pm #

    My dear Brethren,

    I am no one to dishonor the mighty grandson of the Holy Prophet Muhammad sal allahu alayhi wassalam..
    I simply hold the opinion that Allah swt will not question me on the day of Qiyamah that… such and such person dishonoured Hazrat Imam Hussein so wht did I do to defend him…
    Allah says in Surah Maryam, Chapter 19 Verses 88-92, that the worse abuse that anyone can give to Allah swt is to say, that Allah, Ar Rahman, The Merciful God took up a child… The worse abuse anyone can give to Allah is to say he has taken upa child… Allah is reaching out to every Muslims through these verses and telling us that people who say Allah took up a son for sure have abused the Merciful God… I want to know what are you doing about that….

    Allah swt tells you in the Qur’an, “Qul (tell them)..Wala Taqulu Salasa (Dont say trinity), I want to know what are you doing about that… Allah says, in The Quran In Surah Ale Imran chapter 3 Verse 64, ” Say to the people of the book, that we come to common terms as beetween us and them…..” I want to know whether you invited the People of the book… Allah swt took the trouble to send down a Book of the size of theQur’an and your not moved… you are fighting for the “supposed dishonor” of Imam Hussein (may Allah be pleased with him)…whe Allah’s honor is being abused by the Christians. (Surah Maryam Verses 88-92)… I want to know what have you contribution been to that…..

    When Allah has already honoured the grandchilrenof the Prophet peace be upon him, who will try to take it away…NO ONE…. SO let us do the job that Allah wants us to do… Let us propogate Islam and reach out to the non-muslims….Let us talk man…. READ THE QUR’AN…Its a solution to your and everyone’s problem….InshALLAH, Allah will guide one and all…

    Wa akhiru dwana anil hamdu lillahi rabbil alameen

  • Najamuddin Mahesar October 24, 2008 at 3:48 pm #

    assalam o alaikum mere nazdeek hum ahle sunnat barelvia ka yehi aqeeda sahih hai k hamen yazid k laanati aur jahanumi hone main koi shak nahin aur yahe wo shakhs hai jis ne hazrat imam hussain radi a allah anhu ko shaheed karwaya han us ke kafir hone ya na hone ke bare main sukoot kya gaya hai jesa k alahazrat maulana ahmed raza khan fazil barelvi aur un ke followers ka aqeeda hai. hum sunniyon ko is maamle main koi shak nhn karna chahye yehi rahe haq hai agar kisi ko bhi is masale p aetiraz hai to ulama e ahle sunnat se rabta krn

  • Najamuddin Mahesar October 24, 2008 at 3:57 pm #

    aur main yeh bhi kahna chahta hoon k jis ne bhi yazid paleed ka defence karne ki koshish ki hai use toba karni chahye aur apne kharab soch se baz aa jae warna allah ki pakar nihayat hi shadeed hai. aur wo shakhs sunni nhn main use danke ki chot p yazeedi paleed kahta hoon aur aam muslims ko chahye ke yazeed k followers se door rahen aur un se social bycot karen k wo siwad e azam se nikal gae. allah wa rasooluhu aalam.

  • SAGE ATTAR October 31, 2008 at 9:18 pm #

    ATTARI in WAR:

    i ask for concentration of both 1. zakir nayak supporters
    and 2. zakir nayak’s anti.

    the problem is not with zakir nayak.
    not even with the supporters of Mr. nayak.
    it is all about ” THE PRINCE AND LEADERS OF PEOPLE OF HEAVEN, IMAM HUSSAIN RADIALLAHU ANHU” AND the BEST STUDENT OF SHAYTAN the most deserver of JAHANNAM the murid of khabbis the king of deviated minority, (ameere shaytan) khabbis YAZID (lanatullahi alaihi) may ALLAH gives place him to the most unbearable portion of held. AMEEN BIJAHINNABIYIL AMEEN SALLALLAHU ALAIHI WASALLAM).

    LETS SEEE HOW CAN I HELP THE DISCUSSION……………

    WAIT BROTHERS WAIT………. FOR THE EVIDENCES.
    EVIDENCE THAT STRICKES ALL THE DISCUSSION ABOVE……..

    MEET U SOON……………………………………..
    INSHALLAH AZZAWAZAL.

  • SAGE ATTAR October 31, 2008 at 9:43 pm #

    SURAH AL AHZAB, VERSE: 57,
    “Undoubtedly, those who annoy Allah and His Messenger, Allah’s curse is upon them in the world and in the Hereafter and Allah has kept prepared for them a degrading torment.”

    DOES ANY OF THE YAZIDI SUPPORTERS UNDERSTOOD ANY THING FROM THESE VERSE.

    YAZID (LANAT OF ALLAH BE ON HIM FOR EVER AND EVER) HAD MURDERED THE BLESSED GRAND SON OF RASUL E KARIM HABIB E RAHIM (SALLALLAHU ALAIHI WASALLAM). DONT U YAZID SUPPORTERS FEEL THAT BY HIS SUCH AN ACT OUR BELOVED PROPHET ALAIS SALAM HAS BEEN ANNOYED. AND IF SO THE IT IS PROVEN THAT YAZID DESERVES AND RECEIVES MOST UN BEARABLE CURSE OF ALLAH THE ALMIGHTIEST.

    WAITING FOR REPLY FOR YAZID SUPPORTERS,
    SPECIALLY: 1. ” TALHA RAFIQUE”, 2. “NAIK THE HERO”, 3. sHAJAHAN, 4. “ABDULLAH KHAN”, 5.” JAFAR”, 6. AND ALL OTHERS.

    I M NOT AGAINST ZAKIR NAYAK BUT IN FACT I M AN OPEN ENEMY OF ALL THOSE WHO ARE IN FAVOUR OF SAYING “RAHMATULLAHI” FOR the jahannami YAZID THE murid of devil.

  • sage attar November 3, 2008 at 2:32 pm #

    by the above VERSE of HOLY QURAN mentioned in above post, it is proven that yazid the murid of devil should be said “lanatullahi alaihi”. okkkkkkkkk

    now, back to the matter Mr. zakir nayak.

    After reciting the verse mentioned in the above post, it is obligatory for us to curse the YAZID. but unfortunately, one of the reknown person of this era, named, “Mr. (ohh sorry) Dr. Zakir Nayak” had said that Yazid could be said “rahmatullahi alaihi” which means “may ALLAH’s BLESSINGS BE ON HIM”.

    Q. Dont u Yazid supporters recognise THAT Dr. zakir nayak is going against the QURAN. Where THE GLORIOUS QURAN says tha any person who annoys the BELOVED PROPHET ALAIS SALAM, that person is been cursed by ALLAH AZZAWAJAL. THEN how Dr. zakir can say that “may the blessings be upon him” to YAzid (may ALLAH send curse on him the student of devil).

    DR. ZAKIR SHOULD REPENT FROM HIS FATAWA. OR ELSE FATAWA AGAINST HIM WILL BE SOON ISSUED.

    ASSALATU ASSALAMU ALAIKA YA SAYEDI YA MAKKI YA MADANI YA HASHMI YA QURAISHI YA RASULALLAH (SALLALLAHU ALAIHI WA SALLAM)

  • Khalifa November 3, 2008 at 8:33 pm #

    Salam
    SAGE ATTAR i want 2 ask u a simple question did yazeed kill Hussain ra or Ordered to kill him RA ?

  • Arshad from Islamabad November 7, 2008 at 5:51 am #

    I think Dr. Naik should have explained this issue himself by not taking refrence of other fatwas but from Quran and Hadidh past events as he has been famous of doing so.

  • sage ATTAR November 7, 2008 at 5:58 am #

    Walaikum Assalam

    Dear brother KHALIFA,

    ” yazid (MAY CURSE OF ALMIGHTY ALLAH be always on him) had ordered “ibne ziyad” to either force FOR “BAYAT” (ACCEPT yazids FALSE AND NASTY MINISTRY)

    or

    sloughter, the PRINCE OF JANNATI YOUTH guys, HAZRAT IMAM HUSSAIN (RADIALLAHU ANHU, MAY ALLAH ALWAYS AND ALWAYS SEND BLESSINGS AND MERCY TO THE GRAND SON OF THE BELOVED OF ALLAH (AZZAWAZALLA WA SALLALLAHU ALAIHI WA SALLAM)

    i know you would ask for references.

    Wait for my next post.

  • mohammad aamir November 7, 2008 at 9:32 am #

    mere khyal se zakir naik par galat ilzaam lag rahe he, kyunki wo har baat ka jawaab quran aur hadees se dete he, aur hame quran aur hadees ko maanna chahiye, allah ke rasool aap s.a.w. ne bhi yehi kaha tha ke qabro ko ek baalisht se oonchi na banaya jaaye, aur qabro pe imaarat na banai jaye, yehi baat zakir naik ne bhi kahi he to hum ye baat kyu maanne se inkaar karte he, aur sirf allah se maanga jaaye aur nabi aap s.a.w. ke tareeqo pe chala jaaye, hame ye nahi kaha gaya he ki hum apni marzi ke maalik ban jaye, allah ke rasool aap s.a.w. ne apne aakhri waqt me ye alffaz kahe the.. ALLAH KI LAANAT HO YAHOOD AUR NISAARA PE KE JINHONE APNE BUZURGO KI QABRO KO IBAADAT GAAH BANA LIYA !! ab aap hi bataiye kya zakir naik ne kuch galat kaha? aap s.a.w. ne qabro ki ziyarat karne se mana nahi kiya allah ke rasool aap s.a.w. to khud qabro ki ziyarat karne ke liye jaate the lekin wo wahan jakar qabr me murde se kuch nahi maangte the balki khud us murde ke liye magfirat ki dua karte the, lekin aajkal ke musalmaan to magfirat ki dua maangne ke bajaaye khud qabr me lete hue murdo se hi maang lete he, kya in musalmaano ko ye ilm bhi he ke jo murda is qabr me he wo achchhi haalat me hai ya buri haalat me? us murde par allah ka azab baras raha he ya rehmat? lekin phir bhi hum ye gair sharaee kaam kiye ja rahe he. ! me sab se pahle aap logo se ye puchhta hu ki aap agar sach me sahi raaste par hai to pehle ye kaam band kar do (1) mazaaro ki qabr ko ek baalisht se zyaada ooncha mat rakhiye, (2) qabro par imaarat na banaiye.
    me ye sab baate isliye bata raha hu kyunki ye sab bbate allah ke rasool aap s.a.w. ne kahi thi, ****

    khuda haafiz.!!
    Warning-Next time this Language will not tolerated.You may be banned
    Note-Two post were deleted due to useless comments.

  • umar surti November 7, 2008 at 6:59 pm #

    whn i shown my chirstian friends videos of zakir naik. they agreed there is something in islam that they should learn about.

    he can show people what islam is about. stop bullying him ….. instead try helping him

    he is definately the one who is helping islam… if you keep doing this to him i fear you are making impression that islam is about fighting…

    people understand him … stop proving him wrong else nonbelievers will have a reason to say that they cant believe what dr zakir naik is saying….. coz we ourself tried to prove him wrong..

  • azeem November 8, 2008 at 12:14 pm #

    I’m always with Dr. Zakir Naik ……. and can do any thing to support him

  • sage ATTAR November 11, 2008 at 12:57 pm #

    brother, muhammad aamir,

    (nice urdu language. dear only for u i have write my entire post in urdu.)

    app hazrat ko ye kiyu lagta hay ke hum sunni (ahle sunnat jamat wale) gayr sharaye kam karte hay. app ne kaha zakir nayak ne jo bhi kaha hay woh thik hay kiyu ke wo hamesha QURAN AND SUNNAT ke daire may rehkar jawab deta hay. ok then abb app hi faisla kijye ke,
    1. zakir nayak hamesha QURAN AND SUNNAT ke roshni may agar baat karta hay to kiyu wo SAHIBE QURAN HUJUR PUR NOOR HAZRAT IMAMUL AMBIYA
    HABIBE KIBRIYA MUSTAFA ZANE RAHMAT (SALLALLAHU ALAIHI WA SALLAM) KE nawase ke dushman yazid (lanatullahi alaihi) ke liye “RAHMATULLAHI ALAIHI” kehna durust kaha.

    DR. ZAKIR is a nice person. BARAK OBAMA IS ALSO A NICE PERSON. is ka ye matlab nahi ke hum obama ki har baat manle. ZAKIR NAYAK ne jo kuch bhi din ne islam ke liye kia hay wo beshak tarif ke layak hay. is ka ye matlab nahi ke hum musalman uski ye behuda aur kufriya fatwe ko bardasht karenge.

    abb baki raha ek sawal ke kiya sahi mano may zakir nayak ne yazid (lanatullahi alaihi) ke liye “RAHMATULLAHI ALAIHI” KEHNO KO DURUST KAHA HAY? agar ha to usne kufr kiya hay. usse chahiye tawba karke tamam olama ke samne apna fatawa ko wapas le.

    akhir may: aapne BUZURGO KI “MAJAR E AKDAS” par ungli uthahi hay. ok

    ISKA JAWAB:
    MASHHUR KITAB “JAAL HAQ” BY “HAKIMUL UMMAT MUFTI AHMED IYAR KHAN NAIMI RAHMATULLAHI ALAHI” may milega. ye kitab baraye mehar bani kharid kar pare ya phir DAWATE ISLAMI ke website par log on kar ke ye kitab download kare. phir usse pare aur apna akida durust kare.

    AND STAY WITH IN THE CURRENT TOPIC.
    MUJHE PATA HAY KE APP LOG BOHOT KUCH NAHI YAKIN KARTE HO AUR NAHI MANTE HO. QURAN SUNNAH KE ROSHNI SE HUM SUNNIO KA HAR AQIDA AUR AMAL SABIT HAY.
    ISTARHA LIKH KAR APKO SAMJHANA SAYDH KUCH MUSHK THA as i m a student too. to waqt izajat nahi deta hay. app sunni olama ke kitab pare aur jane ke hamara har har amal QURAN AUR SUNNAT KE DAIRE ME HI HAY. ALLAH HAFIZ

    DIL SE MUSTAFA KO TU PUKAR
    SIRF EK BAR SIRF EK BAR
    DARE MUSTAFA PE AWLIA O KA BAHAR
    AB TU BHI HO JA TAIYAR
    SIRF EK BAR SIRF EK BAR.

  • sage ATTAR November 11, 2008 at 1:06 pm #

    SUNNI AQEDA KO QURAN AUR SUNNAT KE ROSHNI MAY JANNE KE LIYE DAWATE ISLAMI KI WEBSITE PAR LOG ON KIJYE, AUR KITABO KI JAKHORO MESE “JAAL HAQ” NAMI KITAB ONLINE YA DOWNLOAD KARKE PARE INSHALLAH BOHOT FAIDA HOGA AUR BOHOT SI GALATFEMI DUR HOGI,

    SAHOLATI KE LIYE MAY WEB LINK DERAHAHU:

    http://www.dawateislami.net/library/writer.aspx?wrtid=wrt-24

  • xavier November 12, 2008 at 8:35 am #

    allah is great thats all i know i love allah lets live in peace

  • Rais Akhtar November 14, 2008 at 8:26 am #

    Dear Muslim brothers
    Assalamoalaikum
    Pleae do not querral and choose the correct teaching of Islam. Dr. Zakir Naik never quote any thing without reference of Qur’an or Hadees. Please let him do daae work. May Allah bless His Shower to Dr. Zakir Naik. I pray Allah to create thousand of Dr. Zakir Naik. Ameen

  • Shahzad Khan November 15, 2008 at 8:25 am #

    Dear All,
    Dr. Naik doesn’t says anything by himelf, but only based on Our Quran Alhamdolillah !
    These “Mullas” either Sunni or devbandis does not stand anywhere in front of him. They only do politics. They have splitted Muslims today in so many sectors. Why we ourself do not read and understand Quran ?
    Do it !! Be a good muslim !

    Ask these “fatwa machines” to have a debate with Dr. Naik.

    “Allah Knows Best”

  • Shahzad Khan November 15, 2008 at 8:38 am #

    Anyone of you ever heard about “Punishments as per Sharia” there are a number of punishment as per Islamic sharia for “Maulanaa & Muslim leaders” if they do anything wrong.

    Why they never discuss those punishments things to public in India specially ??

    Mulla, Muftis etc are the Valuable & respectible people on which Muslim community belive and trusts.
    We listen and obey these guys. So they must be genuine “as per quran” !!

    In all cases one party is wrong and other is right. The wrong must pay for the wrong deed if proven !!

    Isn’t it ?

    If I ma wrong anywhere, May Allah Forgive me !
    “Allah Knows the best”

  • palestineismail November 20, 2008 at 6:15 pm #

    Salams,

    Q1) Who are WE to critisize him for a small mistake?
    Q2) Who are WE to call him a kafir?
    Q3) Who are WE to judge our scholars?

    If you are a scholar, then masha Allah, if your not, please be quiet. The Prophet (SAWS) said that whoever calls a person a kafir and he is not a kafir, the peron whoo called the muslim a kafir will be a kafir. And surely all kafirs are in Jahannam.

  • tariq November 22, 2008 at 1:53 pm #

    Salam for all muslim
    Dr, Zakir naik is a great scholler of Islam and he spread the truth of Islam. now the shias are try to stop him. i Pray that Allah gave the power to Zakir abdul Karim Naik to spreading the truth of Islam all over the world.
    Jazakumulah ho khair

  • Shahnawaz warsi November 23, 2008 at 2:11 pm #

    Very Sorry to All
    Including Sher-eGhousia some Comments were Mistakenly Deleted while approving them.plz cooperate.thnx

  • muhammad umair November 23, 2008 at 9:58 pm #

    shit head why would someone say that yazid ra how ever says that is stupid

  • Sher-e-Ghousia November 24, 2008 at 12:23 am #

    Shahnawaz Warsi Sahib, don’t worry I saved a copy of my post. Alhamdulillah.

    ——————————–

    Mani – I am not going to bother.

    ———————————————-

    Umar Surti – “stop proving him wrong else nonbelievers will have a reason to say that they cant believe what dr zakir naik is saying”

    So you want us to stop defending Imam Hussain (radi’Allahu anhu) so that Dr Naik can spread his corrupt version of Islam to the innocent? Shocking!

    ———————————————-

    Azeem – “I’m always with Dr. Zakir Naik ……. and can do any thing to support him”

    Didn’t Dr Naik say we should not blindly follow others?

    ———————————————-

    Xavier – “Allah is great that’s all I know I love Allah lets live in peace”

    If people stopped insulting Imam Hussain (radi’Allahu anhu) then we may have some peace. Insha’Allah Aza wa’jal.

    ———————————————-

    Rais Akhtar – “Dr. Zakir Naik never quote any thing without reference of Qur’an or Hadees.”

    No offence, but your comments show complete ignorance. Quoting a reference and using it in the right context are two different things. This is why you see non-Muslims using Qur’an references without the right context and meaning to present Islam as a ‘violent religion’.

    ———————————————-

    Shahzad Khan –

    “They only do politics”. That is backbiting. You should repent.

    “Why we ourself do not read and understand Quran?” Does Dr Naik understand the Qur’an?

    “Ask these “fatwa machines” to have a debate with Dr. Naik.” They have, but Dr Naik is backing out. Typical.

    ———————————————-

    Palestineismail –

    Q1) Who is he (Dr Naik)? How dare he insult Imam Hussain (radi’Allahu anhu)? If you think insulting Imam Hussain (radi’Allahu anhu) is “small”, then you should be ashamed. Sayyiduna RasoolAllah (sallalahu ‘alayhi wa’alihi wa’sallam) cried when He (sallalahu ‘alayhi wa’alihi wa’sallam) was given the soil of Karbala. If Sayyiduna RasoolAllah (sallalahu ‘alayhi wa’alihi wa’sallam) thought this was “small”, why did He (sallalahu ‘alayhi wa’alihi wa’sallam) shed tears?

    Q2) Are you talking about Yazid or his lawyer Dr Naik?

    Q3) Scholars around the Globe have condemned Dr Naik over this matter. Also, Dr Naik is not my scholar as he does not meet the criteria of one.

    “The Prophet (SAWS) said that whoever calls a person a kafir and he is not a kafir, the peron whoo called the muslim a kafir will be a kafir.”

    So does this also apply to the many pious Scholars who declared yazid a kaffir, such as Imam ibn Hanbal (Radi Allahu Ta’ala Anhu)? Simple Yes or No will do.”

    If yes, you are indirectly calling Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal (Radi Allahu Anh) a kaffir? Allah Ta’ala Forbid!

    ———————————————-

    Isn’t it ironic? All of Dr Naik’s supporters claim to follow the Qur’an and Sunnah, but the way they act it’s as if they don’t know anything apart from this man. These people did not have an opinion before, but as soon as their Dr Naik said something on the topic of Karbala, they all take his opinion as fact. Didn’t Dr Naik say taqlid is forbidden?

    The difference between the two parties is summed up by Rais Akhtar. He/She, who is a supporter of Dr Naik said “I pray Allah to create thousands of Dr. Zakir Naik.”

    However, those whose heart is with Imam Hussain (radi’Allahu anhu) will say ‘I pray Allah Ta’ala creates billions of lovers of Imam Hussain. Ameen.

  • farhat November 24, 2008 at 7:14 am #

    dear all let me tell u the person in question here dr zakir naik is neither a maulwi nor a mufti so it amaze me how u people can follow him blindly.when he dont know himself how can he tell us.

  • farhat November 24, 2008 at 7:20 am #

    what can u expect from a jaahil.tommorow he will use some words to glorify shaitan and u guys will accept it.

  • Mohammad Sajid November 26, 2008 at 3:26 pm #

    I thik u r absolutely jahil(who is called shaitan).
    i had wrong the way which support ur every speeches…….
    i think u r pure shitan(kafir)

  • khalid December 1, 2008 at 12:07 pm #

    these r brainless people who r tryin to defame Dr. Zakir naik…

  • shah rehan December 2, 2008 at 8:56 am #

    naik done a big mistake of his aqira

  • sage ATTAR December 12, 2008 at 10:13 am #

    ADVICE FOR ALL………………………

    DR. ZAKIR NAYAK IS ONE WHO HAS GONE THROUGH ONLY THOSE PARTS OF HADITH AND QURANI AYAT WHICH IS RELEVANT FOR QUARRELING WITH NON MUSLIM OR WHICH ARE INCLUDED IN THE COMPARATIVE RELIGION STUDY SYLLABUS.

    ZAKIR NAYAK HAS NOT GONE THROUGH FIQH AND SHARIA ISSUES. HE HAS VERY LITTLE KNOWLEDGE OF FIQH AND SHARIA ISSUE WHICH HE HAS GATHERED FORM READING AHLE HADITH BOOK PROBABLY. SO …………………………….

    SINCE HE IS EXPERT IN COMPARATIVE RELIGION AND WEAKEST IN SHARIA ISSUE SO WE SHALL NOT FOLLOW HIM REGARDING ANY SHARIA ISSUES.

    EXAMPLE: HOW CAN A PERSON SUFFERING LOW SIGHT PROBLEM (HAVING PROBLEM IN EYES) SEEKS ADVICE FROM EAR SPECIALIST….

    SOUNDS FUUNY

    THEREFORE, WHEN WE NEED TO SOLVE A COMPARATIVE RELIGION ISSUE WE CAN WATCH ZAKIR’ S VCD OR BOOKLETS.

    BUT BESIDE THESE EVERY SORT OF ISSUE OF SHARIYAT SHOULD SOLVED BY A LEARNED PERSON. THAT IS “AMER E AHLE SUNNAT”………. OKKKKK DEAREST ISLAMI BROTHERS.

  • sage ATTAR December 12, 2008 at 10:20 am #

    THE MATTER “yazid, the cursed”.

    SINCE HE TOO IS A FIQH AND SHARIA ISSUE SO WE SHOULDN’T ASK DR. ZAKIR REGARDING WHAT SHALL WE CALL HIM KAFIR, OR FASIK OR ZAKIR’S FRIEND.

    FOR SOLVING THE PROBLEM THAT SOULD WE SAY RAHMATULLAH ALAIHI OR LANATULLAHI ALAIHI FOR YAZID. WE MUST SEEK A HONOURED WELL INFORMED AND KNOWLEDGABEL PERSONALITY SUCH AS IMAM AHMAD IBN HAMBLE OR IMAM AZAM ABU HANIFA OR IMAM GHAZZALI, OR ALA HAZRAT IMAM AHLE SUNNAT, OR AMER AHLE SUNNAT.

    OKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK

    EVEN IF ALSO DR. NAYAK’S PER DOGS QUARREL FURTHER THEN NOTHING TO DO. ……………….

  • shoaib cheema December 13, 2008 at 10:42 am #

    To know in depth Dr. Zakir Naik please read book “Islam Aik –Insan Aik” in Urdu language. This book consists of 110 Questions & Answers of Dr. Naik on various issues.
    You may get it by post
    Contact: 92-300-9555081

  • MUSLIM December 15, 2008 at 7:45 am #

    Brother sage ATTAR,

    Assalam o alaikum.

    This the problem with our Muslim bothers, we have been carrying many misconseption as such.

    You advised to reffer some scholars, but you don’t know what they said.

    Here is for you.

    *** Imam Muhammad Ghazali is quoted in several books saying;
    “He (Yazid) was a Muslim with a correct Islamic principles and a complete Muslim and it is not permissible in the Islamic laws or practices to curse and abuse him.”
    *** Mullah Ali Qari said, ““The majority of the Scholars have prohibited cursing Yazid and Hajjaj.”

    *** Imam Qazi Abu Bakr ibn al-Arabi Maliki another scholar did not hold permissible the cursing and abusing of Yazid nor declaring him to be a disbeliever. He said, ““If it is said justice and knowledge are from the conditions of Caliphate and Yazid neither had justice nor knowledge, then we would have to ask, by what evidence this conclusion was drawn that Yazid had no justice or knowledge.” (al-Awasim Minal Qawasim (pg.222)
    In another statement; “Where are those historians who wrote against Yazid in mentioning alcohol and open sinning, do they not have any shame?” – meaning where are the evidences for these accusations.” (ref books:al-Awasim Minal Qawasim (pg.222)
    *** Sheikh Abdul Mugheeth Hanbali has the unique distinction of being one of the earliest known biographers of Yazid. Hafiz Ibn Kathir said about Sheikh Abdul Mugheeth that, “He was from the righteous Hanbali’s who the common folk referred to.” – (al-Bidaayah Wan-Nihaayah (12/328).Sheikh Abdul Mugheeth was also not in favor of cursing Yazid or declaring him to be a disbeliever, rather he authored a biography of Yazid with the title of “Fadhal Yazid.” and ‘Fadhal Yazid bin Muawiyah’. – (ref books: Hidaayatul A’aarifeen Asmaa al-Mu’allifeen Wa Athaar Musannifeen (5/623), al-Bidaayah Wan-Nihaayah (12/328).

    *** Ibn Kathir reported on Allama Abul-Khair Qazwaini ,another Islamic Scholar,that; ““After he left Qazwain he went to Baghdad where he became a teacher in Madrassa Nizamia and he would admonish and deliver lectures to the people. So on the day of Ashurah he sat on the minbar to admonish the people, it was said to him to curse Yazid bin Muawiyah. He replied, “He was but an Imam Mujtahid.” (ref books: al-Bidaayah Wan-Nihaayah (9/13), Risaalah al-Mustarfah Lee-Bayaan Mashoor Kitaab as-Sunnah al-Musharfah (pg.132).

    *** Ibn Salah was also not in favor of cursing Yazid or saying he was a disbeliever. Ibn Hajr the Meccan writes, ““Ibn Salah who is from our jurists and scholars of Hadith, I have seen in his Fatwa that when he was asked concerning the individual who would only curse Yazid because he ordered the death of Husayn. Then in answer to this he said, according to us Yazid ordering the death of Hussain is not a correct report and cursing and abusing Yazid is not the sign of a believer…..” (as-Sawaa’iq al-Meharqah (pg.222).

    *** Ibn Taymiyyah was neither in favor of cursing Yazid nor declaring him to be a disbeliever. He says, ““And the people who curse Yazid and other such people like him then it is upon them to bring evidence, Firstly: that he (Yazid) was an open sinner and an oppressor and therefore prove he really was an open sinner and an oppressor as allowing him to be cursed needs to be proven that he continued this open sinning and oppression to the end up until his death. Secondly: Then after this they must prove that it is permissible to curse specific people like Yazid. ………… and the verse, “May the Curse of Allah be upon the oppressors”, is a general verse like the verses concerning punishment…………..And the Hadith compiled by Bukhari states the first army to wage Jihad against Constantinople is forgiven and it is clear that their commander Yazid ibn Muawiyah was a member of this army and is included in this forgiveness………..” (ref books: Minhaaj as-Sunnah an-Nabawiyyah Fee Naqdh Kalaam ash-Shee’ah Wal-Qadariyyah (2/252), al-Muntaqa Minhaaj al-Ei’tidaal Fee Naqdh Kalaam ar-Rafdh Wal-Ei’tizaal (pg.290).
    *** Ibn Qayyim Al-Jawziyya writes in his book “al-Manaar al-Muneef”, ““All the narration’s that mention the censure of Yazid bin Muawiyah are lies……………All the narration’s that mention the censure of Muawiyah are lies.” (ref book: al-Manaar al-Muneef Fis-Saheeh Wadh-Dha’eef – pg.220).

    And there are many more,………………………

  • MUSLIM December 15, 2008 at 7:48 am #

    I request all my Muslim Bother to read above post, before abusing Dr. Zakir Naik.

  • SHAIKH RASHID January 7, 2009 at 4:55 am #

    ASAK ,SIR I HAD 4 SON’S STUDYING 1) SK PARVEZ STUDY MBA DISTANCE FORM PUNE UNIVERSITY 2) SK SHOHEB STUDY B SC NURSING 2 nd YEAR DY PATIL PIMPRI PUNE . 3) SK ZOHEB MBBS 2 nd YEAR LATUR MIMSR COLLEGE. 4) SK TABREZ 11th SCIENCE BZ URDU HIGH SCHOOL BHUSAWAL.
    SIR I M IN NEED OF FINANCIAL HELP FROM YOUR SIDE AS MY SELF IS UNABLE TO ARRAGE THE FINANCE FOR ALL OF THEM SO PLEASE SEND US DETAIL HOW TO GET THE FREE SCHOLARSHIP FORM YOUR SIDE .
    MB NO 09373735339

    MY RESUME
    SK RASHID SK NAZIR
    WORKING AS CONDUCTOR IN TRAIN FOR BHUSAWAL DIVISION
    ADDRESS R N SK ,RLY NORTH COLONY ,RB II 874 C ,BHUSAWAL 425201. DIST JALGOAN MAHARASHTRA.
    SIR IM USING MY SON MAIL ID TO GET IN CONTACT WITH U
    PLEASE SEND THE FORM OF SCHOLARSHIP .
    ALLAH TALLA TAOOOUN FARMENE WALLO KO DUNIYA AUR AKHIRAT MIEN BHI ZAKIRA ATTA FARMATIEN HAI.

    ALLAH HAFIZ

  • Syed Qaisar Imam January 10, 2009 at 8:03 am #

    Brother Sher-e-Ghousia ,
    You have tried to reveal the truth of Yazid I have 100 of proofs about his mischiefs. One thing I want to make clear about Yazid and his family. They were anti prophets. Islam believes in peace and harmony. The Islam today you seeing is of salafis , wahabis, its is yazidiat brother. The hadith they refer that ” one who will conquere Constantinopole will go to heaven is false”. Because this hadith is not reported by Sahah Sitta and these Hadith’s are fake. Secondly somebody Hadith is said like that ” when Our Prophet (PBUH) saw Yazid on Maawiyah’s shoulder He said, “Jannati ke Kandhe pein dokhi sawar”. This Hadith is also false because Yazid was born after 632 A.D ( or we can say after the Parda of our Prophet (PBUH). His was only 36 at the time Karbala incident. You may refer to historical truth. I salute you to defend the true Islam of Hazrat Imam Hussain. I believe that Sufia Ekram are the only True Ummat of Hazrat Muhammad Sallalho alaihi was sallum.
    salam , you can call me personally at : 09931169229 (India)

  • Syed Qaisar Imam January 10, 2009 at 8:27 am #

    IN ibn kaseer, Tabqaat Ibn Khaldun, Albiya wal Nihaaiya , It is clearly mentioned that about 90 years of Ummayads they cursed AHal-le-biat in the Khutbah of Friday. But when Hazrat Umar bin Abdul Aziz came into power he stopped this malpractice and in place of that Abuse the AAyat Surah Nahal : 90 was recited. I do not think that anybody in thepast has praised Yazid as good man even and talk about Imam Timiya, he blamed Hakim Bu Ali sina as a Yahudi. Should A muslim call another muslim a Yahudi due to some differences. Imam Timiya is not our Imam , our Imam is Hazrat Imam Hussain. Don’t be doubtful I am Sunnih, And as a follower of sufi order, I remember a verse from Hazrat Jami (RA) : AA rraan ke dostiye Ali neest, kafir Aast , go ke Zahid-o- Zamana o sheikh ra Paash.

  • Eng.Nehmood(Kashmir Study Circle) January 10, 2009 at 7:51 pm #

    Formula for Shea Sunny Unity
    My request to viewers is that in present miserable condition Muslims should give priority to eliminate differences.

    Both main sects of ISLAM Sunny & Shea believe in Allah, prophet Muhammad peace be upon Him, holy Book Quran.
    No doubt there are some minor differences based on history. Which, we should ignore for unity.

    As per my personal limited research is concerned I do feel there is more misunderstanding created by anti Islamic elements & via self desired elements belonging to both sects. That creates gap between both sects. I have practical experiences regarding this gap being surrounded via both sects. As nears & dears are followers of both sects.

    Some Sunneys have the following wrong conception about the religious belief of Sheas because of the conspires of anti Islamic activities & self-desired elements plan.
    That Sheas believe it was Ali R.T.A., who deserves to be prophet.
    That Sheas don’t believe in Hadeath
    That Sheas treat Ali R.T A. as Allah
    That Sheas don’t respect Sahabas & Azwaj Mutharat
    That Sheas believe that present holy Quran is not complete
    And so many other wrong conceptions
    Regarding above mentioned created wrong conceptions the main sect of Shea Asna Ashhere believes in Allah, Hadeath, holy Quran & have regard for Sahabas & Azwaj Mutharat. Also believe Hadeth. It is regard of Ajwaj Mutharat which compel Imam Khumane R.A. to issue Fatwa against Salman Rashde.

    There are some sub sets created from Shea as there are Qadyanes created from Sunneys, like Ali Mola & other groups, who have above mentioned un Islamic conceptions.

    Here let me quote saying of Imam Khumane R.A. regarding respect of Sahabes that anti Islamic elements deliberately decreases the credibility of great Islamic personalities for victimize ISLAM. Imam says that actual intention of these elements is to undermine ISLAM via blaming our heroes.
    Those self-desired elements, who are involve in disgracing Islamic heroes, are part of problem for ISLAM. As, those assets whose huge sacrifices & services for ISLAM have formed big Islamic state, are worth praise for all sects of Islam.

    Both communities have belief that Ali R.T A., were among the most pious, brave, intellectual Sahabe & Imam. Who being family member of Prophet were much close to Muhammad,so under close supervision of Muhammad peace be upon Him. That great Imam, whose wisdom, services & sacrifices like other Sahabas for Islam are worth praise & pride for us all, support Ist three Khulphas. It is lesson for those, who claim that Ali R.T.A. was having differences with Khulfas. The support of Ali R.T.A. to Khulfas is itself lesson for us all to maintain unity, goodwill for giving good message about Islam. Ali R.T.A. being too near to Prophet as Haroon of Mosa. One should see the Bob Ali in Sunny Hadeath Books regarding the status of Ali R.T.A. That lion of Allah, great Imam neither never abuse any Khalefa nor oppose Khalafes. Even for safety of Usman R.T.A. direct both Imams Hassan & Hussain R.T.A. to protect Usman R.T.A. So it is religious duty of all Muslims to follow Imams.

    We can discuss some issues on the base of history but have no right to disgrace Islamic Heroes. Those who at present are not even in position neither to free one inch of occupied soils nor ready to provide sacrifices like Sahabs & Imams for Islam have morally & logically no right to criticize those Islamic heroes ..

    Also some Sheas on the base of planned propaganda of anti Islamic & self desired elements have some baseless conception about Sunneys
    That Sunneys don’t have regard for Ali R.T.A.
    That Sunneys don’t have regard for Hassan & Hussain R.T.A & believe in suicide of Hussain R.T.A.
    That Sunneys believe Yazed was right & Hussain R.T.A. wrong
    That Sunneys don’t regard Ahal Bayet
    And, other baseless conceptions on the base of propaganda.
    Sunneys have much respect for Ahal Bayet. How can one have concerns about those dignities of Ahal Bayat, in favor of whom there are so many Hadeath of Prophet Muhammd peace be upon Him. Even to pay blessings to Ahal Bayet is must via Darood Ibrahim for all Muslims in prays.

    Sunneys have regard & respect for these pious personalities as per spirit of Islam.. They are respected by both sects. Hassan & Hussain R.T.A. declared as sardars of Heaven by Muhammad peace be upon Him. How can any Muslim dare to commit against these sardar Immams.

    Sunney & Sheas have common faith that Yazed was not on right path & cruel ruler. Who was involve in crimes including big sin Shahadat of Hussain R.T.A.& His nears dears & innocents. No doubt there are some people who as per plan of anti Islamic elements are involved to prove Yazed on right path. Which majority of Sunneys don’t accept? Who believe in Islam should avoid to accept this logic that any person involve in atrocities to family of prophet Muhammad peace be upon Him can never be fair. Majority of past & present great Sunny scholars have common logic that Yazed is wrong & Imam right.
    At present miserable situation we should avoid to raise such issues, which can create more disunity. And should concentrate on unity.

    Scholars of both sects should come forward to provide proper guideline for unity of both sects.

    For eliminating gap, my request is that Sheas should avoid to raise questions for those, who are worth praise for Sunneys & Sunneys should avoid to protect anti Islamic rulers like Yazed, who were directly involve in victimize Imams & other Islamic scholars. As there is no comparison between Imams & hamams.
    Sheas should introduce in their literature the services of Sahabes for Islam & Sunneys to introduce the sacrifices of Immams for Islam. As it is observed that Sunneys know about services of Sahabes ,Wales but not more about sacrifices & services of Imams like Imam Jaffer, Imam Zain ul Abdin, Imam Ali raza….,Whose full life is itself the reflection of their origin prophet Muhammad.

    Allah says if any act you feel is wrong has right side also.
    As per Jehad in Karbala is concwerned, Umpire was never desire of any Imam. Even they reject such offers. This, positive approach provide them chance to preach ISLAM through out World. So Sunneys in addition to giving credit to Sahabes for their sacrifices for Islam, Muslim rulers for invading non muslim countries should remember the sacrifices of Sadats for teaching Islam also. Even these Sadats with other Taba tabeeb Sahabes, Muslim scholars, businessmen visit far flung areas like soils Indonesia, Malashia, Kashmir…..for preaching Islam. These Sadats were followers of both sects. But their mission was to preach Islam only. After, holy visit of Shah Hamdan R.A. to Kashmir for preaching Islam,some Hindus already were converted to Hanfe Muslims. He being from Shafe sect in His seventeen pious visits from Iran to Kashmir preach as per Hanfe belief to avoid confusion for new Muslims in Kashmir. When He was questioned regarding this attitude His reply was if he will introduce shafism,it will disturb mission to preach Islam. It is open lesson for those preachers who only concentrate their sect throughout world. Even I have personal experience that after some fair efforts when I along with some brothers succeed to motivate a person to adopt right path. Some followers of another sect try to motivate him to adopt their belief, which confused him.

    Sheas should introduce inm their literature the positive aspects of all such Sahabes, rulers, scholars who have sacrificed & served for Islam. There is no doubt about this realty that the attitude of some rulers with Sadats & other Islamic scholars was too much rude. But if we analyze neutrally & honestly there are some evident that some Sadats were involve in clashes with each other. Also scholars like imam Hanefa of Sunney sect were victim of such rulers. Even under some Sheas regim Sunneys were victim of same cruel acts repeated. So for cruel acts we should avoid to blame Sunneys or Sheas. Such cruel rulers are neither sincere with Sheas nor Sunneys.

    There is majority of rulers even some from Benea Umea like Maeya bin Yazeed, umer bin Aziz, whose attitude was with regards & respect for Sadats & other well-wishers of Islam.
    We should keep the sentiments of others in mind while committing about any Islamic hero. Even Islam teaches us not to disgrace gods of Kafres. Then how can we justify disgracing those personalities, who are part of Iman for Sunneys & Sheas. Any type of dishonor via any side for such personalities is the base of disunity.

    By disgracing any high cadre of any sect nether Shea Sheikhs will succeed to motivate Sunnys nor Sunney ulmas will succeed to satisfy sheas. As in Sunney families elders preach their kids from childhood that regard of Khalifas, Imams & Azwaj Mutharat is part of Iman. Same is with Shea families that from very beginning elders teach kids to regard Ahil Bayat ,Imams & Sahabes & relatives of Muhammad including great uncle of Muhammad Abu Talab is Iman. So this regard which Muslims feel is sign of Iman remains with them throughout life. So any type of disgrace for any Sahabe or Khalafa is intolerable for Sunneys & any type of criticize for Imams even to Abu Talab is intolerable for Sheas.

    Only fair logic can do the needful, but better is to pay attention for those non muslims, who are not aware about blessings of Islam. But have wrong conception about Islam due to any nearby immature, self desired, corrupt, cheater, killer, greedy, lier, cruel…. morally weak Muslim.

    In present miserable situation when whole Muslim World is neither with any safety nor with peace due to far behind in modern technology. Resulting majority disputes & disturbances are in Muslim areas. Even in modern century there are so many countries occupied by big powers directly or indirectly. Need of time is to avoid to disgrace those heroes of Islam, who are respectable for both sects for eliminating differences.

    Any person if involve in blaming such heroes of Islam are pipits of anti Islam elements. Well wishers of both sects should launch unite jehad against such criminals. And both sects should concentrate the solution of present problems of Ummah. And should provide priority to serve humanity via launching more charity schemes as if we compare charity field with Christian machinery there is big gap. \

    Also for any death person his or her case is with Allah. And we are answerable for our deeds. Also to discuss issues & find their solutions is the best policy than to discuss people.

    My intention is fair regarding this article. Still being sensitive subject if any person hurts should excuse me. Allah knows my hearts desire is unity, so deserve prays from all viewers as I have domestic ills. And miserable condition of Muslims compels me to write. Otherwise I deserve guideline from well educated viewers.
    May Allah shower His blessings on us all
    AMEEN
    Yours brotherly
    Eng.Mehmood
    Kashmir Study Circle

  • Zahra January 11, 2009 at 3:57 pm #

    For the benefit of all those who are very conveniently defending the biggest sinner and criminal of humanity i. e YAZID. I would like to ask all of you one question:
    DO YOU NOT BELIEVE IN PROPHET MUHAMMAD?
    I’m sure the answer will be yes for everyone here claims to be a muslim. Then I would ask you DO YOU NOT THINK THAT THE PROPHET LOVED HIS GRANDSON AND HIS FAMILY IS WORTHY OF RESPECT?
    I’m sure the answer to this will be yes, for if u can respect his companians then Imam Husain was his flesh and blood.
    Now yazeed is the person who kept the PROPHET’S FAMILY HUNGRY AND THIRSTY AT KARBALA! AFTER SLAUGHTERING HIS FAMILY THE TENTS WERE BURNT! LATER THE CHADDARS( head scarves) were TAKEN away. This is not even a fraction of what was done. all of this was DONE BY YAZEED! now how can anyone of you defend yazeed?

  • Zahra January 11, 2009 at 4:02 pm #

    now I ask all of a simple humanitarian question: would you like a person who killed ur family? or a person who took your sisters chaddar? or you burnt your home?
    any sane human being would say no. Now the person in question that is YAZEED did all this to the prophet’s family! Do you not love ur prophet?
    for the love of god, think rationally how can u defend a person who did all that to the prophets family????
    please stop thinking in terms of shia or sunni, WE ALL SHARE THE SAME PROPHET AND WE ALL SHOULD HAVE THE SAME RESPECT FOR HIS FAMILY! KARBALA IS NOT FOR ONE SECT, IT IS FOR ALL OF US! !
    Our problem is that we are too rigid, we think in terms of our sect forgetting what binds us all is our prophet and karbala is all abt him and yazeed was his enemy do how can you defend him?

  • Zahra January 11, 2009 at 4:07 pm #

    now most of you will think of the above mentioned as a shia comment, i would like to clarify that i’m a sunni by birth.
    I always wanted to know why the shias mourn so much amd then i found my answer. I would suggest that you all read the history of karbala and Bagh e Fidq and ul find out for urself.
    Most of us are scared that reading might change our view and how can we go against sunnism.for heavens sake, we all have to go our grave, so learn for urself.

  • athesham January 15, 2009 at 5:14 am #

    Muslims should try and understand what their real religion is instead of supporting zakir naik you must condemm him. How could he praise yazid, a killer, a tyrant, a person who doesnt believe in allah,his book n rasool pbuh.
    I do not understand the faith of sunnis, are you people’s not aware what rasool allah said when coming back from his last hajj, are you peoples not aware about ghadeer khum, and prophet had elected Hz. ali a.s. as his successor. Does any of the hadiths or ayat supports this fact that abu bakr was elected by the prophet of allah.
    Go and ask your zakir naik as to why abu bakr snatched bagh-e-fadak from the daughter of the prophet, ask zakir naik why did umar torture the daughter of the prophet, do not you sunnis know the famous hadiths of the prophet that whoever angers fatima, angers me, and whoever angers me angers allah….ask zakir naik what how badly umar behaved with the daughter of the prophet, it was because of umar that the daughter of the prophet had a miscarriage, ask zakir naik did’nt umar kick and slapped the daughter of the prophet.
    ask zakir naik did not abu bakr gave a fake statement that prophets do not leave back inheritance, if so why did then he give his daughter ayesha lands and rasool allah’s house as inheritance.
    abu bakr, umar were no khalifat al muslameen, they were greedy of power and wealth. islam doesnt accepts the verdict of a woman, and your highest book sahih bukhari contains hadiths said by ayesha.
    read your own books and find the importance of ahle bait, we shias are the real followers of rasool and his family.
    ask zakir naik did’nt the prophet of islam cursed marwan, and the 3rd caliphatal muslameen gave marwan great power and got his daughter wedded to him.

    ask zakir naik was it not the hadees of the prophet the one of his wife on whom the dogs bark will be the cursed one, didnt dogs bark on ayesha when she was getting ready to fight Hz ali a.s. in the battle of jamal.

    before saying that whether shias are muslims or not go and discover the real islam. Till today miracles happens on the graves of the ahle bait, does anythng happen on the graves of abu bakr or omar??

    ready the history of kerbala, if kerbala was a political war then why did Imam hussain a.s. take women and small children with him, it was such a war that Imam hussain sacrificed his whole family, even his 6 months old infant was killed by an arrow, and the person responsible was yazid whom zakir naik praises.

    go and read books and in every book you will find yazid was the killer of Imam hussain a.s.

    read the reply of ammar nakhshawani to zakir naik and you would understand.

  • AFZAAL FAROOQ February 4, 2009 at 9:15 pm #

    ASALAMALIKUM

    MAKE DUA FOR ALL MUSLIMS

    W SALAM

  • Mohammed Umair February 9, 2009 at 11:12 am #

    The Primay basis on which a person will judged on Judgement day or in Grave after death is not by his good deeds but it is by his AQEEDA. First comes aqeeda and then good deeds, if person has done good deeds and has a bad aqeeda about prophet (Salallahu alayhi Wasallam) e.g(Zakir Nayik) then irrespective of good deeds he will be thrown into hell.

  • aftab alam February 12, 2009 at 7:53 am #

    i want join with u

    • Shahnawaz warsi February 12, 2009 at 8:43 pm #

      If u wish to Join then plz tell are u agreed to the AHLESUNNAH points given on second page of site. if Yes.Plz start sending articles news slowly ur name will be on the site.

      shahnawaz Warsi

    • Shahnawaz warsi February 17, 2009 at 1:35 pm #

      u may join us start sending mails n news…..soon u will be added…

    • Shahnawaz warsi February 19, 2009 at 2:23 pm #

      first we would like to know about u urs ideology and much more…

    • KHan April 26, 2012 at 10:23 am #

      I AGREE AND JOIN YOU

  • Faiz March 25, 2009 at 1:47 pm #

    Shias are embittered by profound knowledge of Dr.Zakir Naik.His depth analysis of any subject coupled with rational reasoning made him an apple of the eyes of everyone(Muslim and Non-Muslim alike).

    He has so far brilliantly defended Islam-The religion of peace.He took up cudgle against any allegation on Islam.

    It was devious ploy to malign him.Well If shias think threy are spick and span on Islamic knowledge than they can preach there version of Islam.

    Let’s see Who wins.

    Islam is the fastest growing faith:Yusuf Islam(aka Cat stevens),Fidelma O’leary(Austin university Professor),Sheikh Hamza Yusuf(Founder of Zaytuna University),Yusuf Estes(Formerly pastor of Texas),Ingrid Mattson(Hrford seminary Professor),Muhammad Ali(Former heavy weight Boxer),Abdul Jabbar(Basket ball player)…..And many more embrased Islam (NOT SHIITE) because it is different from Christainity-In christainity Sainthood id recognised and there is Pope and priest between God and the mankind.

    SHIAS are similar to christians as they also have concept of 12 Imams(allah knows how 12 why not 13 or 14 no where in Quran such things are mentioned).

    THey make mythological stories as that of Hidden Imam(Like Harry Porter fantasy).

    Allah said in Quran when truth and falsehood collides than falsehood perished because it is by nature bound to demolished.

    May Allah Bless Zakir Naik he demystified so many misconception about Islam.

    He debated against all the allegation on Islam and subsequenly his popularity is elevating.

    Sending the chill down the spine of SHIAS

    • KHan April 26, 2012 at 10:26 am #

      YOU ARE ALSO THE SAME FOLLOWER OF BATIL TRY TO SERACH WHAT IS HAQ VISIT THE GRAVE OF BATIL YAZID AND U WILL GET SAWAB OF HELL FIRE STUPID

  • abdur rajjaque April 25, 2009 at 9:07 am #

    السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته

    “الصلاة معراج المؤمنين ” اهو حديث ام لا؟ ا في كياب من الكتب الاحاديث ؟ التمست منكم الجواب بالحوالة
    الملتمس :- عبد الرزاق غفرله بنغلاديشي

  • Ishteyaque Ahmad May 12, 2009 at 10:06 am #

    Dear Borthers

    Let us do the Muffti & Aalim their work… we cant decide who is right or wroung.
    For Example : A simple non technical person cant suggest how to solve any computer hardware problem. if he will start to suggest about compauter maintainance .. people will stop him saying you are not a computer hardware Engineer / technician…

    I dont understand why are we objecting Muffti & Aalim sentances.

  • zeeshan waqar May 16, 2009 at 6:59 pm #

    Assalam-o-Alaikum(may peace be on you)
    I am Zeeshan from Pakistan.
    My only pray to Almighty Allah that Dr. Zakir Naik will get succes in spreading the truth of Islam and Allah make his way easy.
    Peaples are continuously trying to prove Dr. Zakir Naik & Islam wronge.

    My request to Dr. Zakir Naik that please give a thorouth lecture in Urdu on the topic of YAZID and from proper history and islamic point of view from authentic sources.
    That will help alot to whole Muslim Ummah to get rid of this miscomception.
    may Allah bless you.

  • Faroukh May 18, 2009 at 9:08 am #

    - Dr. Zakir is not an knowledgeable in the matters of Fiqh. He is a good Islamic preacher who is good at inter-faith dialogues etc and there is no doubt about that. But he lacks basic knowledge of Fiqh and any person who has some knowledge in this area will understand what I am talking about.

    – The topic here is not how great Dr. Zakir Naik is. The topic is whether he was justified to use Radhiallahu anhu for Yazeed. Majority of Muslims curse yazeed due to his involvement in tragic incident in Karbala. It should be noted that apart from Karbala, he terrorized Makkah and Madinah and even damaged Kabah in the process.

    – Even if we agree for the sake of argument that Yazeed was not involved in Karbala, he has so many other sins that doesn’t allow him to be called (Radhiallahu anhu). So many members of Ahle Bayt were brutally killed, why did Yazeed not punish those who were responsible for it? What about other actions after Karbala? Tons of scholars have cursed him, considered him Kafir..and even those who remained silent…you won’t find anyone using Radhiallahu anhu. All of them considered him sinful. If Dr. Zakir Naik claims to be a Muslim..a follower of our beloved Prophet (S.A.W), how can he be so irresponsible and consider such person worthy of (RA) when he has not only terrorized Ahle Bayt..but the whole Muslim Ummah. The least he could have done is remained silent about this issue and realized what harm Yazeed has caused to this ummah.

  • Shakil Ahmed May 26, 2009 at 8:42 pm #

    I have no doubt that Shias are Kafirs and I don’t know why they are allowed to masjid al haram . Yazeed is far better than Shias and Abul-Ala-Maududi, Syyied Qutub and Dr. Yousuf Al Qaradawi. One thing more Yazeed was a muslim but Syyied Qutub was a mutazilah and Yousuf Al Qaradawi is a complete Kafir but I wonder why do people Praise Syyied Qutub. . Yazeed commited Jihad against the Kafirs .”—I will be highly against all Sunni Scholars who say that Shias are fasiq because doubtlessly they are kafirs except Jaidis. If I would have the power I would have ban Shias from Masjid-Al-Haram.
    SEE THE KAFIR SHIAS

    http://www.allaahuakbar.net/SHIITES/is_shia_kafir.htm

    NOW SEE THE KAFIR QARADAWI:

    http://www.livingislam.org/k/yq_e.html

  • Fatima May 27, 2009 at 3:09 pm #

    sallam to all brothers and sisters .
    every ones knows that ZAKIR NAIK is serving ISLAM .n wut has done that sia scholar zaki bakri ,,, ?except spilt in islam he is doing ,so please stop saying any wrong thing for DR ZAKIR NAIK ,may ALLHA bless him.

  • Faansaal June 9, 2009 at 2:12 am #

    Not a single human being is innocent on this earth other than the Prophets. Even Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon him and his family) used to say Istighfar every day.
    Today no one will say May Allah be Pleased with Sadaam Hussain. As he was a very cruel man.Fact. Mu’awiya played a very negative role with Hadhrat Ali (May Allah be Pleased with him) though Hadhrat Ali (May Allah be Pleased with him) was on the right path. And I donot know why Zakir gave an example of Hadhrat Ayesha (Peace be upon her) that she also fought against Hadhrat Ali. History says that she wept later too much over what she did. Her Istighfar and sadaqaat would surely be granted By Allah Subhana wa Ta’ala as she did it with sincerity.Several Ahadith-e-Nabwi (Peace be upon him) (prophecies) support Hadhrat Ali when Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) was alive.
    Now did Mu’awiya repent for what he did as Hadhrat Ayesha (Peace be upon her) did? Or POLITICS AND POWER were too attractive or dearer to him ?
    Lets come to Yazeed. Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) loved his grandsons very very much and said a number of things which would occur to the young princes in their future which shows their being innocent and on the right path. It is not impossible for a prophet to know something in advance that is revealed to him by Almighty Allah Himself. To Yazeed as well, politics and power were dearer to him than the life of an innocent human being and that too of a grandson of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH). What I know from the history books is that Imam Hussain (Peace be upon him) had absolutely no intentions of power and politics. He was a no threat. Would he bring his family (women and kids) on the war front? Having said that some people may say that he went to fight a political war. My question is Tell me isnot it instructed by our Allah and Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon him) to raise your voice, pen, sword against a cruel Hakim, ruler or atleast condemn it in your heart, which is the lowest level of Imaan. Did Hadhrat Hussain (Peace be upon him) do something wrong? Did not he want peace and prosperity for the Muslims and Islam?

    Only a Prophet is saved by Allah from all crimes and sins. Mu’awiya and his son were not prophets that we are so scared to say that Yes they were wrong and cruel. And on whose authority was Yazeed chosen for Imamat? Was he as pious as Hadhrat Hussain (May Allah be Pleased with him) and May Allah Give him the highest level of Paradise for the sacrifices that he and his family did for the Muslims and yes for us the muslims who now say Yazeed May Allah be Pleased with him. God Forbid.

    We sunnis and other sects of Islam except Shiahs, donot even know who were the Aaemas that the Shiaas reverve. Its a shame on all of us. They were the very very noble, pious and God-Fearing grand grand sons of Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon him and his entire family) who were oppressed, imprisoned, isolated, poisoned and martyred by the very caliphs of Ummaya and Abbasis.We never talk about the caliphat of Hadhrat Ali (May Allah be Pleased with him). Hadhrat Muhammad (PBUH) ahadith about the 12 leaders from the ahl-e-bait-e-Rasool (pbuh) is even agreed bu all Islamic scholars but still they make unbelievable statements about them. Where as Imam Mahdi’s (alaihis Salaam) being from the Ahle bait e Rasool clearly shows that all of them had to be from the family of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH). We always prefer to close the topic and our eyes rather than discussing it. I donot suggest extremacy in anything but at leaset Accept what is right and what isn’t.

    And it should be remembered there is a HUGE DIFFERENCE between what Hadhrat Ayesha (May Allah be Pleased with her) did out of Ignorance over which she repented to Allah with whole heart and what Mu’awiya and Specially Yazeed did. History tells about their lust for politics and power. And if Muawiya was one of the copyists of the Holy Quran then it doesn’t mean that he can never be wrong.He was not even among the ash’ra mubashireen.

    Lets show respect to out Prophet and his family (Peace and Blessings of Allah be upon all of them). His family to which we didn’t do good. That’s true. Turning away from the facts, never make things better. We other sects apart from Shias have so deep rooted beliefs that are pasted on our minds that we donot even listen to them. Imam Ghazali and other 4 scholars may surely have done good works but it doesnot mean that we give importance to everything that they say over the Holy Book and Ahadith-e-Nabawi (Peace be upon him and his family).
    And last but not the least, Zakir’s statement has not created disturbance among a particular sect i.e;Shia. Not at all. Majority of the Muslims rather than a particular minor group like to which Zakir belongs, believes it with heart and mind that Yazeed was a cruel ruler and under his orders this massacre took place or that black day. And he did nothing to compansate his crime, if he were innocent. It is Zakir’s opinion and he shouldnot and cannot impose it on the majority of the Muslims.
    I was raised as Sunni. But after learning how much all of us are in dirt, how much are we in discrimination against the ahle-bait-e rasool (Peace be upon all of them) right after the death of Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon him), reminds me of the Prophet’s Hadith that all sects will go to the hell and one will enter the Paradise. May Allah purify all of us from the self-made extreme views about our Deen and may Guide us to the Deen which was followed by our prophets (Peace be upon all of them). Aameen.

  • Girish June 25, 2009 at 10:01 pm #

    I still don’t understand how come all islam prophets are from one family of Prophet Mohammad (PBUH), like a dynasty. How come there are no (or very few) prophets from other families.

  • Umar July 27, 2009 at 2:37 am #

    He is Zakir Yazeed Nalayak…………….

  • mohammed shujath August 25, 2009 at 5:41 am #

    assalatu assalmualika ya rasulallah wa sallam alaika ya habeeb allah aye mere pyare ghouse-e-azam mere kwaja gharib nawaz mere kwaja bande nawaz aye mere ala hazrath ke maslak ko maine jana
    la ilaha illalahu mohammedur rasulallah

    • Ahmed September 3, 2009 at 3:14 pm #

      gr8t

  • Shaik Javid August 30, 2009 at 11:13 am #

    Assalam Alaikum ,

    Mr.Zakir Naik , he is a accurate and nobel person who says everything correctly about the islam …

    Shame on them who says sunni , shiya , wahabi , etc …
    Mr.Zakir naik said , muslim is a person who beleive and follow Quran and last messenger Rasululah sallahualaihi wasallem…

    See his answer , if we fight like stupids between us , its a great oppurtunity for Non muslims to point out on us and break us …

    Wake up plz wake Khuda ke liye , agar koi insaan age badta hai to us par na jale , agar usse koi galaty hui hai to shayed wo insaan hai , Masiha nahi ya koi messenger nahi,,,,

    Plzz try to understand them , its great , Allah know very well than our stupid humen beings who says more and do a little and who searches the mistakes of the others and hide themselfes ,,,Haram hai ye sab haram hai ….

    Nabiye kareem never say bad words to Kafir , we are muslims comeon wake up

  • Shaik Javid August 30, 2009 at 11:24 am #

    When Abu Jahil the uncle of our Nabye kareem, he was against him , he never say anything bad to him , instaed of he tried him to be a muslim till his death…

    Even rasullah sallehualaihi wasslem can say he is enemy of islam , so i must not convence him to accept the islam…

    But no Nabiye kareem he didnot did like that , when rasullah forgives the person who is totally wrong , so what is their in that when Zakir naik said to Yazeed , bcoz Allah knows better than everyone ..

    May be Zakir naik did a mistake , plzzz see his gud deeds which he did , bcoz of him how many people became muslims ….observe it …

    Why all of this world only sees the wrong , why dont they see at the Gud things …

    Plzzz i request u all to look at the gud thing what he had did for the World , and moreover Allah knows everyhting
    …We are not right persons to decide somthing on someone….

    Plzzzzz
    Try to understand him ,,,,, he is a soldier of Allah according to me… he have every right answer for the wrong question…

    He fights for islam for hours and hours with non muslims , when i saw his live program i was like shocked to see , that people automatically agrees for islam..

    I ask all the people who reads this do u have gud s to answer the wrong questiosn say me , iam sure no

    We dont have time to pray 5 times a day , we are so lazy dazy , and we are searching the mistakes from the other people …

    Remember one thing email ids can be made in any name , plz ignore the stupid comments ,,,,

    Be careful brothers and sisters of islam …..

    • Ahmed September 3, 2009 at 3:10 pm #

      Aqaeed the thing which gives sucesss dr naik has a fasle baseless aqeeda ? thats make him wrong .
      he himself cant challence he knows 100% quran – he speaks what he know – he never said what he dont knew ! ask the one who knows – allah says they are true ones .

  • Shaik Javid August 30, 2009 at 11:31 am #

    Now people are jealouse with Zakir Naik , as he wants us muslims to be together and prove our religion is write ..

    This shiya , they are specially jealouse about him , I do dua that Allah may give Zakir Naik a long life to spread islam and to show the real face of islam….

    He never force any people , only he pass the message from Quran to the people whoever listen to him…

    And people are agreed 100% and they accept islam ,, he is the soldier of the Islam….

    Allah may give him a long life …

    He is a great man , who knows everything about islam and other religion also…

    Our people they know little hadis and they will start iritating people , but see Zakir Naik , see his simplicity , he never be proud to know all this ,

    He is great , he know every religions every book with the meanings . this is gift for him from Allah to expalin the mankind about the islam and its peace ….

    He is a real lover of islam and Allah…

    Iam 100% sure Allah love him more and he likes him ……..

  • umer yazeed September 1, 2009 at 4:26 pm #

    zakir b****

  • Ahmed September 4, 2009 at 4:00 pm #

    Ahl as-Sunnah wa’l-Jamā‘h-
    1. The Ahl as-Sunnat Wal Jama’at is the largest group of Muslims and the only group whose beliefs and teachings are truly in accord ance with the Noble Qur’an and Sunnah of the Most Beloved Prophet (Salla Allahu alaihi wa sallam).

    2. The beliefs of this group are the same as the beliefs of the Sahaba or Noble Companions of the Beloved Prophet (Salla Allahu alaihi wa Sallam) and the Salf-e-Saliheen (our great pious predecessors).

    3. In many Ahadith,the Beloved Prophet (Salla Allahu alaihi wa sallam) strongly advised the Muslims to follow his Sunnah and to remain steadfast upon the path of his Sahaba, the Salf-e-Saliheen and the majority of Muslims to remain steadfast upon the way of the Ahl-as-Sunnah.

    4. The Beloved Prophet (Salla Allahu alaihi wa sallam) said: “I have left two things behind me for you (the Ummah). You will never go astray as long as you follow these two things. One of these two things is Allah’s Holy Book (the Qur’an al-Kareem) and the other is the Sunnah of his Most Beloved Prophet (Salla Allahu alaihi wa sallam).” (Muwatta Imam Malik)

    5. The Beloved Prophet (Salla Allahu alaihi wa sallam) said that after he passes away his Ummah should remain firmly steadfast upon his Sunnah and upon the way of his four Muslim Caliphs. He advised us to follow this Path alone and to be beware of innovations, which contradict the Nobel Qur’an and his Sunnah. (Abu Dawud; Tirmizi)

    6. The Beloved Prophet (Salla Allahu alaihi wa sallam) said: “Follow the way of the largest group of Muslims! For, he who deviates from this group will be thrown into Hell!” (Ibn Majah)

    My dear freinds do Blame anyone Just try to think onces.
    Allah will ask you – had you understood Quran and followed it. he wil never ask what dr zakir naik said because its not history to be understood – its Allahs words.
    we do apprictae dr zakir naiks works as far as non muslim is concern – he is daam good but when its comes to our own community he is just a quranic parrot – to be hafiz to be qari and to the one who knowns quran its entirely different .
    dr zakir naik show muslim tha only ayat who whom his aqeeda is basled – he never shows the 6236 ayat and its reality means wisdom of the ayat – and realted hadith to the ayat nor he describe the circumsatnce of the ayat and the real reason mainly most of the kufar aayat had been named to muslim to those who whole heartly recite kalma shadat its shame on just people who with thier lies and showing just the translation cheat muslims amd blame others –

    ask urs had ever dr naik debated or put on stage any of the single member or mufti all he brings is the same deobandi lobby personalities – think first does he say he real – does he quote the ayat has the same meaning in reality – absoulty not !
    he just a doctor and many times speaks wrong – he speaks about those matter which allah say you dont know to ummah .
    so please beware of just ignorant people and ourself thak the quran and read single ayat with translation its hadith and tafsir and lets see below the ayat and above the ayat – to really to whom it is mention and what is the topic allah taala explaining about !
    surley you will find dr zakir naik a big liar –
    always follow CCI content – context and intension of the ayat just not only to those who show the translation and make you astray ur stairth path –

    you can meet any of ahl sunnat ulema and clear our point with quran ayat with dr zakir never showed in his 10 years time .

    brothers be united and dont follows any of the one just people who are only interest in making thier money as say know its easy to may fool to just people – allah has given quran – so read and undersatnd and follow so that you can knew the whole of the truth not what someone say what he knows and he dont say what he dont knew –

    i may be wrong if such is the case please guide me.

    • Faansaal January 9, 2010 at 5:21 pm #

      Assalaamu alaykum brother Ahmed,

      The hadeeth that you quoted : “I have left two things behind me for you (the Ummah). You will never go astray as long as you follow these two things. One of these two things is Allah’s Holy Book (the Qur’an al-Kareem) and the other is the Sunnah of his Most Beloved Prophet (Salla Allahu alaihi wa sallam).” In this hadeeth the second part in which hadhrat Muhammad (Peace and Blessings of Allah be upon all of them) told was not his sunnah was his itra i.e; his family which is inline with his hadeeth (quoted by the sunnis as well) the appointment of 12 Imams after his death from the Ahlul bayt e Rasool (Sallallahu alaihi wa aalehi wassalam). This has been intentionally misrepresented and misguided so that we may remain ignorant of the 12 Imams starting from Imam Ali alahissalaam. Misinformation should always be discouraged as it creates serious misunderstandings as they have already created split among the muslims.

      Regards.

  • Asif Bhatti September 21, 2009 at 2:02 am #

    Qurani Faisla Believe Or Not
    20/09/09 Asif Bhatti

    Brothers/ Sister of Islam,
    Salaam Alaikum,

    I have read all views, criticisms, and appreciations in favor of your favorite scholars. I am sorry to say that still we are not civilized. What ever shape of Islam we have today it’s just because of us. We are bunch of ignorant literate so called Muslims, doesn’t know how to get and use our knowledge in order to remove any obstacle come in our way. Rather we feel the sensitivity of this fatwa and arising consequences. We are putting the gas on fire. It is not a war it is a matter of source of the knowledge and truth. Instead of we run our horses towards Dr. Zakir Naik, Safdar Karmali or Zaki Bakri and criticize every one. Why we don’t consult the Holy Quran and check it out if Dr. Zakir Naik had a right statement or wrong.

    Dear Brothers/Sisters of Islam,
    Please keep in your mind nothing is important, true or well explained then the Allah Subhana Ho Tallah’s Holly Book Quran. It is mentioned in the Holy Quran that Holy Quran is complete and well explained and nothing left or short, which was important for human society. I tried to find out the truth in Quran and what ever I got from the great Book. I would like to share with all of you. Before I gets start quoting references of the Holy Book. I want to say one thing. Please follow the sunah of Prophet Muhammad (May peace be upon him), do not use disturbing or abusive words. We all are so innocent. It’s a just lack of knowledge. We have very busy life. We don’t have time to find out solutions of our every day issues from the Holy Quran. We put all the pressure on these scholars. We don’t even think that all these scholars are humans and they can make mistake too. They are not responsible for our mistakes on the judgment day because you consult them for you issue and solutions. It is our job to study the Holy Quran and get the Qurani knowledge and apply the law of Allah Subhana Ho Tallah in our lives as Prophet (MPBUH) says and did. We should not depend on those scholars. Because there believes always reflecting different school of thoughts. Whoever is proving according to the Holy Quran accept him and whoever proving through the history or ahdeeds (certain extend) reject him. Important (Hujat) is Holy Quran. Dear Brothers/Sisters it is our duty from our Allah that we should have study the Holy Quran with meanings, understand this and practice our lives according to the Law of Allah Subhana Ho Tallah. May Allah Subhana Ho Tallah bless us and let us be on right path.
    In Holy Quran Allah Subhana Ho Tallah use complete term for all of those peoples (those became Muslim and have been sit with the Prophet Muhammad (MPBUH) they were trained and have education by Prophet Muhammad (MPBUH) himself )Says in Holy Quran “friend of Rasool Allah (MPBUH) 48/29 Even called Prophet Muhammad (MPBUH) their friend 53/2. All of those friends of Prophet Muhammad (MPBUH) have been called as “Momeneen” in Holy Quran. More over to be better understanding among those to divide them in two groups 1- Muhajereens, 2- Insaars. Except these Sahabahs there is a third group of people mentioned in the Holy Quran those accept Islam were based on different group of (bada Nasheen)(tribes). Although they did accept Islam but not from the depth of their heart 49/14. Whoever called munafaqeen may be these third categories were those.
    What Holy Quran says about first two categories Momeneen?
    1- That’s Allah Subhana Ho Tallah who gave his blessing and creates a jamatey Momeneen; those were your follower and power 8/62.
    2- Ya Nabi” Allah and Momeneen are enough for you.8/64
    3- These people are continuously calling morning and evening to Allah. Have them 18/28, 18/52,
    4- Put your hand on (protect them) those are your follower among the Momeneen 26/215, 15/88.
    As I explained Momeneen were divided and called as Muhajereens and Insaars.
    5- Those were migrated and did Jihaad for Allah and Those, have them shelter and help them. All of those are Haqa (true) Muslims. Those have been forgiven and blessed Rizq-qe-Karim 8/74.
    In the above mentioned Holy Verses, Allah Subhana Ho Tallah called Momeney Haqa to all the Muhajereens and Insaars and guarantee forgiveness and Rizq-qe-Karim for them. What will be the most authentic and pure witness available in this galaxy for anyone’s Imaan, his forgiveness and Rizq-qe-Karim.
    Then mentioned in Sourate At-Tawbah.
    6- Those joined first and those joined later, Allah Subhana Ho Tallah is happy with them and they are happy with him. Allah Subhana Ho Tallah has ready garden (Jinnat) like, stream runs under these gardens. Those lives in these (haven) for ever and it’s a great success.
    Please pay attention that Allah Subhana Ho Tallah has Guarantees to all Sahabahs (Friends of Prophet Muhammad (MPBUH)) forever Jinnat and Regardless whether they joined first or later, issued a great certificate of (Radi Allah Anhum Wa Radwa anaho).
    Moreover explained about those joined later at another place that
    7- Before the victory of Mecca, those spent their money and did Jihaad in the way of Allah Subhana Ho Tallah and those did later. They have different ranking. The first joiners are having the top ranks but promises (Forever Jinnat and Rizq-qe- Karim) of Allah Subhana Ho Tallah are for all of these. Allah Subhana Ho Tallah is aware of every body’s Amaals.
    These are the kind of friends of Prophet Muhammad (MPBUH). Then Allah says in,
    Sourate Al-Feth,
    8- Muhammad (MPBUH)) is a Rasool of Allah and those with him are so tough for the Kufaars (non Muslims) and very kind among themselves. They bend for (law of Allah Subhana Ho Tallah) and does Sijda (establish them and pay thanks to Allah Subhana H0 Tallah for the completion of their job). They search for fazal Allah (they do every thing according to the law of Allah Subhana Ho Tallah) and make him happy.
    Now Brothers/ Sister of Islam,
    it’s your turn to think that if Dr. Zakir Naik is right or wrong. If Allah Subhana Ho Tallah guarantees to those Sahabahs and use the word of Radi Allah Anhum Wa Radwa anaho, how come some one else become important then Allah Subhana Ho Tallah and how can he uses the bad word for those Sahabahs or even one of them. Please try to correct you and others. It is not a matter of ego. Do not be the one of those; Allah Subhana Ho Tallah says they can not be change. If you find out from the Holy Quran is true. Please prey for me to be on to right path and be a part of Momeneen. “Insha-Allah”
    Allah Subhana Ho Tallah may bless all of us and help to correct our directions and become Muslims Haqa(true).
    Was Salaam.

  • Anotherside!!! September 25, 2009 at 6:57 pm #

    Shias love cursing every one who reject their fabricated history.

    They even curse sahabah so what is naik for them

  • muslim October 22, 2009 at 10:05 am #

    @anotherside

    and what do wahhabis do? send peace on the killers of husein(a.s.). for your information he is grandson of prophet (p.b.u.h.) & it is said by prophet(p.b.u.h.) himseld that he is leader of youth in janaath. this part history is not fabricated and accepted by all sects of islam.

  • adeel October 27, 2009 at 9:06 am #

    yar aap sub musalman ho agar kisi nay humar nabi ya ala hazrat par ungi utathi na to us ki who ungli aysi jaga di jaygi gis ka elaz kisi dokta k pass nahi hogai/gulami-e-rasool ma moot bhi kabool hai yad rakho.

  • Syed Viquar Ahmed Quadri November 4, 2009 at 3:39 am #

    • I had a respect for Mr. Zakir Naik. I praised his works. AFTER HEARING MR. NAIK PRAISING YAZEED I started hating Mr. Zakir Naik.
    Mr. Naik is not worth for hating also. He poses himself to have the knowledge of QURAN, he has half knowledge of QURAN, IN QURAN ALLAH SAYS ONE WHO IS FRIEND OF RASOOL ALLAH (S.A.W) AND HIS FAMILY MEMBERS, ALLAH IS WITH THEM,
    ONE WHO IS ENEMY OF RASOOL ALLAH (S.A.W) AND HIS FAMILY MEMBERS, ALLAH IS THE ENEMY OF THOSE PERSONS.
    YAZEED WAS THE ENEMY OF Hazrat Imam Hussain (Raziallahu Anh). How can Naik praise Yazeed
    Yazeed was a drunkard, he did not obey his father, he was drunk when his father died, he did not attend Namaz-e-Janaza of his father. Mr. Naik praises Yazeed the “Ayash”.
    After the incident of Karbala in 62 Hijri Yazeed attacked Madina and killed more than 10,000 Sahaba (R.A). He caused panic and havoc in Madina because of which Azan was not called from Masjid Nabvi. His army tied horses in Masjid Nabvi and at Mazar-e-sharief of RASOOL ALLAH (S.A.W.), Urine and dung of horses was spread there. Naik praises Yazeed.
    From Madina Yazeed’s Army marched to Mecca, there they burnt GILAF of Khane Kaba.
    Naik praises Yazeed.
    WHAT ALL GOOD WORK MR. NAIK DONE WAS ONLY TO BRING THE MUSLIMS TO FOLLOW THE IDEOLOGY OF SALAFISM. MR. NAIK WILL SURELY GET THE PUNISHMENT FROM ALLAH IN THIS WORLD AS WELL AS IN KHAYAMAT.

  • Mohsin Annayat November 13, 2009 at 11:05 am #

    I read quite a few comments and believe me its not a matter of Shia or Sunni’s. It is clear and evident from more than 90% scholars that Yazeed is Kafir and full time laanti.

    there can be no argument on that. I just can’t believe how Naik and his followers defend Yazid. It definitely seems that they all have blood relation with Yazeed as some one curses Yazid they all feel the pain.

    well it is not far when everyone will see who is on the right path and who is on the wrong. But I am damn sure Yazeed’s followers will definitely will have a special place in Dozak (Inshallah).

    I as a sunni love Hussan(RA) and whole family of Prophet(PBUH). I really feel pain that despite Rasool(PBUH) efforts to spread Islam.. still their exists love for the criminals, dictators and Zalims. May Allah help us all.

    Yazeed pay lanaat beshumaaar …

  • Slave of Prphet (p.b.u.h) December 6, 2009 at 7:16 am #

    Those who Love The Holy Prophet ( P.B.U.H) will never support Idiot Zakir.

  • Slave of Prophet (p.b.u.h) December 6, 2009 at 7:18 am #

    Rember The Day of judgement, then what face you will show to The Holy Prophet (p.b.uh) by supporting Idiot Zakir.

  • Slave of Prphet (p.b.u.h) December 6, 2009 at 7:24 am #

    Iam Sunni and Love Imam Hussain & Hassan ( R.A) more then my life, family , each and every thing.

  • Ch. Muhammad Tariq Gujjar December 14, 2009 at 8:12 am #

    Dear All,

    Asslam-o-Alaikum,

    Dr. Zakir naik is a good scholar but this fatwa regarding Yazeed L.A is a wrong speech of Dr. Zakir Naik.

    Ap sab kehtay hain k zakir naik jo be kehta hai wo Quran or Hadith ki roshni main kehta hai to yeh bataiye k Yazeed nay jo kuch kia wo na quran main hai or na hadith main bcoz ye to Hazoor S.A.W k Wisal k baad hua, to zakir naik nay kahan say ya fatwa jari ker dia k yazeed theek tha, …
    2). 1 hadith main hai k Hazoor S.A.W nay apnay sahiba say farmaya k 60 hijri main banu umaya k londay mere ahlay bait ko qatal karain gai, is per sahaba karam nay un logo per lanat farmaye, so aj yazeedi lashkar ya keh raha hai k yazeed ko kuch pata he nahi tha wo to bacha tha apni maan ka doodh pi raha tha us waqt :D ,
    3). Yazeed ka sirf karbala wala kaam he afsoos nak nahi bal k is nay or be bohat say ghalat kaam kiye, jaisay is nay Makah ki behurmati ki, Madina main is ki waja say kafi rooz masjid-e-nabwi main namaz nahi hue, sharab tun ho k pita tha… so aj us shaks ko sirf is liye bachaya ja raha hai k wo in ka imam hai, isi liye to kehta hoon yazeedi lashkar..

    or han ager Quran or Hadith ki roshni main yazeed L.A ko bacha sactay ho to koi be ayat ya hadith biyan karo…

    Tariq Chishti

  • Altaf Hussain December 26, 2009 at 9:40 am #

    AoA

    Dr. Naik has dropped his image to say few lines in respect of Yazid “Laeen” because every one rest of the world knows about his deeds what he did withAll-e-Rasool ” lot of curse upon Yazid” Now it is clear Mr. Zakir that Yazid is known by his deeds you can not protect him.
    If you protect further to Yazid also you shall be called Yazid of the time.

  • A MUMIN MUKHLIS December 28, 2009 at 2:56 pm #

    AL QURAN STATES
    BISMILLAHIR RAHMANIR RAHIM

    QUL LA AS ALOKUM ALAIHEN AJRAN

    ILLAL MAVADDATA FIL QURBA…

    SADAQALLAHUL ALIYUL AZIM

    SAY THEM THAT I DONT ASK ANY REWARD FROM YOU BUT DO KEEP LOVING AND GOOD RELATION WITH MY DEARS…………….

    once a huge tribe with their properties and animals arrived before prophet NABI MOHMD S.A.W and thanked him for all the benefits given to humanity and asked him to accept the gifts of animals gold and other wealth they brought with them…

  • zeeshan ali December 28, 2009 at 10:55 pm #

    Triq bhai kia comments hain ap k great,
    ye zakir nayak british university ka scholar, deen main nai nai baten shamil karny waly deharyo main sey he. yazid (L.A) tha or qayamat tak Al,e,Rasool (saww) ki mufiqat karny walon per Allah ki Lanat hi rahey gi.

  • zeenat December 29, 2009 at 5:22 am #

    Aslamualikum,
    I am very surprised that why are you arguing with these mushrik Shia. It is waste of time and dont you see what they say about the greates sahabas like abu bakar, omar, usman and so many( ALLAH be pleased with them) , the mushrik shia call them kafir, mushrik and swearing at them. havent you read what shia says about the uml-muminin ayshia and safia (may ALLAH be pleased with them) that even i cant write it because it hurts me alot.

    My friends!
    leave these mushrik shia and dont you see that the people who convert to islam they convert to sunni not shia. those convert to shia who married shia girl or boy.

    because the new muslim read the QURAAN, hadith and sunnah books which are read by the sunni muslim not by the one which are printing in iran, pakistan or iraq.

    may ALLAH guide all of us to the right path and honoured us with jannat-ul-firdous. amin

  • Ch. Muhammad Tariq Gujjar December 31, 2009 at 6:50 am #

    Dear zeenat bhai, baat shia ya sunni ki nahi ho rahe baat yazeed L.A or dr zakir ki ho rahe hai, main nay pehlay be kaha tha k is baat main koi shak nahi k zakir naik k pass bohat ilam hai, but apnay ilam say wo islamic history change nahi ker sacta, wo yazeed ko bacha raha hai ye keh k , k yazeed to Governor tha usay to kuch pata he nahi tha, Firoon nay kitnay bachay qatal karwaye, lakin history is cheez ki gawah hai k us nay apnay hath say 1 be bacha nahi mara, but is ka ye matlab nahi k us ka gunah kisi or k sar hai, Quran Pak main Allah nay farma dia, k “firoon tumhay bachoon ko qatal kerta hai or tumharay aurtoon ko zinda rahnay daita hai”, yazeed khud kerbala main nahi tha but hukam to usee ka tha, us nai Ibn-e-ziad ko baija, phr jo be hua wo sab ko pata hai, yazeed wo shaks hai jiss nai Masjid-e-Nabvi main goray bandwa dia, or Mimber-e-Rasool S.A.W per pishab kia(Nauz-Billah), yazeed wo hai jis nai Qabba ker patharaoon kia or Khana Kabba key Ghulaf ko aag laga di, yazeed wo hai jiss nai Madinah ko 3 din tak lotnay ko halal qarar dia, yazeed zani tha, sharabi tha or us ki halakat wo kasrat-e-sharab peenay say hue, kia aj be aisay log hain jo isay bacha rahay hain, han wo wohe log hain jo yazeed ki ulad hain, jin ko main Yazeedi Lashkar kehta hoon…..

    NOTE: Yeh jitni be batain main nay yazeed k liye kahe hain or jitnay ghalat kaam ginwaye hain, ager ya jhoot ho to Khuda ki Qasam ainda say mujay be Yazeed he kehna….

    Duaoon Ka Talabgar:-

    Tariq Chishti

    • hamro January 9, 2010 at 2:46 pm #

      In the name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful

      Assalaamu `alaykum waRahmatullahi Wabarakatoh

      There are many conflicting narrations regarding Yazeed. Some narrations describe him as being addicted to dancing, wine and music. (Al Bidaya wan nihayyah 11/659 Marqazul buhooth wad diraasaat) He was also accused of legalizing adultery. Some regard him responsible for the martyrdom of Hazrat Husain (R.A). Based on these narrations, some Ulama regarded it permissible to curse him and even passed the verdict of kufr on him.

      There are however, other narrations that describe him as a pious and learned leader. He is also praised for his night prayers. He was very disheartened at the martyrdom of Husain (R.A) and he also cursed the killer. Based on these narrations, there are Ulama who hold him in great esteem.

      A third group of Ulama prefer silence and hand over his matter to Allah. This is the view of the vast majority of Ulama including the (majority of the) Ulama of Deoband. (Aap ke masaail aur unka hal 1/171)

      قال ابن صلاح “والناس في يزيد ثلاث فرق : فرقة تحبه وتتولاّه ، وفرقة أخرى تسبه وتلعنه ، وفرقة متوسطة في ذلك لا تتولاّه ولا تلعنه ، وتسلك به سبيل سائر ملوك الإسلام وخلفائهم غير الراشدين في ذلك وشبهه ،وهذه الفرقة هي الصائبة ،”(أ ب كي مسايل اور ان كا حل 1-172 نقلا عن معارف السنن6-8)

      Ibn Salah (R.A) mentions: “The people have divided in three groups with regards to Yazeed. One group loves him and (accepts him) as a leader. Another group criticises and curses him. (The third) group is moderate towards him. They do not (accept him) as a leader, nor do they curse him. They treat him (as they treat) all other kings and leaders (besides the khulafa rashideen and their likes).This group is on the correct part.”(Aap ke masaail aur unke hal 1/172 with reference to Ma’arifus sunan 6/8)

      The reason for this stance is that many reports condemning Yazeed are weak, especially in view of the fact that many senior Sahabah took allegiance to Yazeed. Yazeeds love for the family of Husain (R.A) is also recorded in many narrations. Consider the following….

      وقد كان عبد الله بن عمر بن الخطاب وجماعات أهل بيت النبوة ممن لم ينقض العهد، ولا بايع أحداً بعد بيعته ليزيد . كما قال الإمام أحمد : حدثنا إسماعيل بن علية، حدثني صخر بن جويرية، عن نافع . قال : لما خلع الناس يزيد بن معاوية جمع ابن عمر بنيه وأهله ثم تشهد ثم قال : أما بعد، فإنا بايعنا هذا الرجل على بيع الله ورسوله، وإني سمعت رسول الله يقول : (إن الغادر ينصب له لواء يوم القيامة يقال هذه غدرة فلان، وإن من أعظم الغدر إلا أن يكون الإشراك بالله، أن يبايع رجل رجلاً على بيع الله ورسوله ثم ينكث بيعته ) فلا يخلعن أحد منكم يزيد ولا يسرفن أحد منكم في هذا الأمر، فيكون الفيصل بيني وبينه . وقد رواه مسلم والترمذي من حديث صخر بن جويرية، وقال الترمذي : حسن صحيح . وقد رواه أبو الحسن علي بن محمد بن عبد الله بن أبي سيف المدائني : عن صخر بن جويرية، عن نافع، عن ابن عمر فذكر مثله”راجع البداية والنهاية/ج11/ص652.مركز البحوث.

      Abdullah bin Umar (R.A) and groups from the household of Nabi (sallallahu alayhi wasallam) did not break their allegiance nor pledge to anyone else after pledging to Yazeed, as Imaam Ahmad narrates (with a chain) to Nafi who said : “When the people retreated from Yazeed bin Muawiyah, Ibn Umar (R.A)gathered his children and family and called out… “Verily we have pledged allegiance to this man on the pledge of Allah and his messenger, and verily I have heard Allah’s messenger say: “On the day of Qiyaamah, A flag will be erected for a person who deceives. It will be said: “This is the deception of a certain person. And verily the greatest deception besides associating partners to Allah is that a person pledges to another on the pledge of Allah and his messenger, and then breaks his pledge. None of you should retreat from Yazeed in this matter nor should you exceed any bounds. That will then be a decisive criterion between me and him.” Imaam Muslim and Tirmidhi also narrated this on the authority of Sakr bin Juwairiyya (R.A) and Imaam Tirmidhi has graded it as hasan and saheeh. Abul Hasan Ali bin Muhammad bin Abdullah bin Abi Saif Al Madaainy narrates (this incident) from Sakr bin Juwairiyya from Nafi from Ibn Umar (R.A). (Al Bidayah wan nihayyah 11/652 Markaz ul buhooth)

      قال علي بن الحسين : دخلنا دمشق بعد أن شخصنا من الكوفة فإذا الناس مجتمعون بباب يزيد فأدخلت عليه وهو جالس على سرير وعنده الناس ساكتين من أهل الشام ومن أهل العراق والحجاز . وكنت قدام أهل بيتي فسلمت عليه فقال : أيكم علي بن الحسين ؟ فقلت : أنا فقلت : ادنه فدنوت ثم قال : ادنه فدنوت حتى على صدري على فراشه ثم قال : أما إنه لو أن أباك أتاني لوصلت رحمه وقضيت ما يلزمني من عنقه ولكن عجل عليهم ابن زياد قتله الله فقلت : يا أمير المؤمنين أصابتنا جفوة فقال : يذهب الله عنكم الجفوة . فقلت : يا أمير المؤمنين أموالنا قبضت فاكتب أن ترد علينا . فكتب لنا بردها وقال : أقيموا عندي فإني أقضي حوائجكم وأفعل بكم وأفعل فقلت : بل المدينة أحب إلي قال : قربي خير لكم قلت : إن أهل بيتي قد تفرقوا فنأتيهم فيجتمعون ويحمدون الله على هذه النعمة فجهزنا وأعطانا أكثر مما ذهب منا حتى الكسوة والجهاز وسرح معنا رسلا إلى المدينة وأمرنا أن ننزل حيث شئنا(مختصر تاريخ دمشق-1-3754 المكتبة الشاملة)

      Ali bin Husain (R.A) (the son of Husain R.A) mentions: “We entered Damascus on our return from Kufa. Many people had gathered at the door of Yazeed. I was taken to him and (found him) seated on a bed. By his side there were people from Shaam, and Hijaaz who were all silent. I was at the head of my family (therefore) I saluted (first). Yazeed asked: “Who of you is Ali bin Husain?” I responded to him. He commanded that I be brought closer to him so much until my chest was just above his bed. Thereafter he said: “Know well, if your father came to me so that I could join ties with him and fulfil his rights (I would have gladly done so) but Ibn Ziyaad, may Allah’s curse be on him, was too fast.” I responded: “Oh Ameer ul mumineen, we are overtaken with dissension.” Yazeed replied: “May Allah remove this dissension.” I submitted: “Our wealth has been snatched. Make a note that it should be returned to us.” He immediately recorded it down. Thereafter Yazeed said: “Stay by me so that I can fulfil your needs and show kindness to you.” I answered that Madinah is much more beloved to me. Yazeed retorted: “Being close to me is better for you” I submitted: “My family is scattered. We would gather them so that they can be thankful to Allah for this bounty.” Thereafter, he equipped and provided for us more than was taken from us to such an extend that he also gave clothes and (other) equipment and sent with us messengers to Madinah. He also allowed that we stop wherever we desire.” (Mukhtasar tareekh Dimasq 1/3754 Al Makabah al shamillah)

      فيروي البلاذري أن محمد بن علي بن أبي طالب – المعروف بابن الحنفية – دخل يوماً على يزيد بن معاوية بدمشق ليودعه بعد أن قضى عنده فترة من الوقت ، فقال له يزيد ، و كان له مكرماً : يا أبا القاسم ، إن كنت رأيت مني خُلُقاً تنكره نَزَعت عنه ، و أتيت الذي تُشير به علي ؟ فقال : والله لو رأيت منكراً ما وسعني إلاّ أن أنهاك عنه ، وأخبرك بالحق لله فيه ، لما أخذ الله على أهل العلم عن أن يبينوه للناس ولا يكتموه ، وما رأيت منك إلاّ خيراً .( أنساب الأشراف للبلاذري 5/17 المكتبة الشاملة)

      Allamah Baladhry narrates that Muhammad bin Ali bin Abi Talib-famously known as Ibnul Hanafiyyah- once came to bid farewell to Yazeed when departing from Damascus after spending some time with him. Yazeed said to him (and he always honoured him): “Oh Abul Qasim, if you had seen any bad quality in me (inform me so that) I can reform. And I can practice on the advice you give me.” Ibnul Hanafiyyah responded: By the oath of Allah, if I saw any evil in you it would be incumbent on me to prohibit you and inform you of the truth for the pleasure of Allah because Allah has made it binding on the people of knowledge to speak the truth and not conceal it. However, I NEVER SAW ANY EVIL IN YOU. (Ansaabul ashraaf 5/17 Al Maktaba al shamilah)

      In the above narrations, the brother of Husain (R.A), Ibnul Hanafiyyah (R.A), testifies that he never saw Yazeed perpetrating any evil. In another narration he denies that Yazeed ever drank wine, omitted prayers or exceeded the laws of the Quraan. Ibnul Hanafiyyah (R.A) also talks of Yazeed’s perpetuity on salaah, his love for good, his thirst for knowledge and attachment to the sunnah.

      نقل الحافظ ابن كثير في البداية والنهاية (11: 654) أن عبد الله بن مطيع مشى هو وأصحابه إلى محمد بن علي بن أبي طالب ( المعروف بابن الحنفية ) فأرادوه على خلع يزيد ، فأبى عليهم ، فقال ابن مطيع : إن يزيد يشرب الخمر ، ويترك الصلاة ، ويتعدى حكم الكتاب . فقال لهم : ما رأيت منه ما تذكرون ، وقد حضرته ، وأقمت عنده ، فرأيته مواظبا على الصلاة ، متحريا للخير ، يسأل عن الفقه ، ملازما للسنة . قالوا : فإن ذلك كان منه تصنعا لك . فقال : وما الذي خاف مني أو رجا حتى يظهر إلى الخشوع ؟ أفأطلعكم على ما تذكرون من شرب الخمر ؟ فلئن كان أطلعكم على ذلك إنكم لشركاؤه ، وإن لم يكن أطلعكم فما يحل لكم أن تشهدوا بما لم تعلموا . قالوا : إنه عندنا لحق وإن لم نكن رأيناه . فقال لهم أبى الله ذلك على أهل الشهادة فقال : إِلَّا مَنْ شَهِدَ بِالْحَقِّ وَهُمْ يَعْلَمُونَ ( الزخرف : 86 ) ، ولست من أمركم في شيء . قالوا : فلعلك تكره أن يتولى الأمر غيرك ، فنحن نوليك أمرنا . قال : ما أستحل القتال على ما تريدونني عليه تابعا ولا متبوعا . قالوا ؟ فقد قاتلت مع أبيك ؟ قال : جيئوني بمثل أبي أقاتل على مثل ما قاتل عليه . فقالوا : فمر ابنيك ؟ أبا القاسم والقاسم بالقتال معنا . قال : لو أمرتهما قاتلت . قالوا : فقم معنا مقاما يحض الناس فيه على القتال . قال : سبحان الله . آمر الناس بما لا أفعله ولا أرضاه ؟ إذن ما نصحت لله في عباده . قالوا : إذن نكرهك . قال : إذن آمر الناس بتقوى الله ، وألا يرضوا المخلوق بسخط الخالق ( وخرج إلى مكة ) .

      Hafidh Ibn Katheer has related in Al Bedayah wan nehayah (11/653) that Muhammad bin Mutee and his companions came to Muhammad bin Ali bin Abi Talib (famously known as Ibnul Hanifiyyah) and desired that he removes Yazeed (from the post of a leader). Ibnul Hanafiyyah blatantly refused. Ibnul Mutee remarked: “Verily Yazeed consumes wine, omits prayers and trespasses the laws of the Quran.” Ibnul Hanafiyyah responded: “I never found him to be how you mention. Instead I stayed by him and found him PUNCTUAL ON PRAYERS, PURSUING GOOD, ASKING MATTERS OF DEEN AND STEADFAST ON THE SUNNAH.” To this they said: “He did this only to impress you” Ibnul Hanafiyyah answered: “What was there for him to fear or have hope in me that he had to show so much humility? Should I inform you of the reality of your accusation that he used to drink wine? If I inform you, you (would realize) you are his partners. If I don’t inform you it would not be permissible for you to bear testimony on what you don’t know.” They said: “This news (of Yazeed’s evil) is true, even though we did not see him personally (carry out any of those evils).”Ibnul Hanafiyyah (R.A) responded: “Allah does not accept that from those bearing testimony.” Then he recited the verse ‘…except those who bear testimony to the truth knowingly.’ And said: “Therefore I have nothing to do with what you say.” Thereupon Ibn Mueet and his companions remarked: “Perhaps you dislike someone besides yourself to be the leader. We would make you our leader.” Ibnul Haniffiya replied: I do not regard it permissible for me to fight for what you want from me-not as a leader nor as a follower.” “But you fought with your father” They interjected. “Bring me the likes of my father so I can fight for what he fought.” Responded Yazeed. “So command your sons Abal Qasim and Qasim to fight with us.” They instructed. Yazeed responded: “If I were to command them I should fight myself.” They said: “At least support us so that people can be encouraged to fight.” Ibnul Hanafiyyah shouted: “Subhanallah! Should I command people with something I won’t do and I am not even pleased with? In that case I won’t be faithful to Allah with regards to His servants.” “In that case we’ll force you.” They threatened. Yazeed retorted “In that case I’ll command people to fear Allah and not please the creation at the cost of the anger of the Creator.” And then he left for Makkah.

      These narrations show the love and respect Yazeed had for the Ahl al-bait. The family of Husain (R.A) are the ones that exonerated Yazeed from the evil’s that were attributed to him.

      Yazeed was also outstanding in his knowledge. Hazrat Ibn Abbas (R.A) praised him for this.

      روى المدائني أن ابن عباس وفد إلى معاوية بعد وفاة الحسن بن علي ، فدخل يزيد على ابن عباس وجلس منه مجلس المعزي ، فلما نهض يزيد من عنده قال ابن عباس : إذا ذهب بنو حرب ذهب علماء الناس ( ابن كثير 11: 642 مركز البحوث) .

      Madaeeny (R.A) relates that Ibn Abbaas (R.A) came to Muawiyyah (R.A) after the demise of Hasan bin Ali (R.A). Thereafter Yazeed entered and sat next to Ibn Abbaas (R.A) to console him. When Yazeed got up, Ibn Abbaas remarked: “When the Banu Harb departs, the Ulama of the people depart.” (Ibn Katheer 11/642 Markazul buhooth)

      Hazrat Laith used to give him the title of ‘Amir al Mumineen’

      قال القاضي أبو بكر بن العربي: “فإن قيل: كان يزيد خماراً. قلنا: لا يحل إلا بشاهدين، فمن شهد بذلك عليه؟ بل شهد العدول بعدالته: فروى يحيى بن بكير عن الليث بن سعد، قال الليث: (توفي أمير المؤمنين يزيد في تاريخ كذا) فسماه الليث ( أمير المؤمنين) بعد ذهاب ملكهم وانقراض دولتهم، ولولا كونه عنده كذلك ماقال إلا (توفي يزيد)” راجع: ابن العربي: العواصم من القواصم 153 دار الكتب العلمية .

      Abu Bakr ibn al-Arabi (R.A) says: “If it is objected that Yazeed was addicted to wine, we’ll say: This is not accepted unless you bring two witnesses, so who would bear witness for you? In contrast, liable people bore testimony to Yazeeds good reputation.

      Yahyah bin Bukair relates that Laith (R.A) used to say: “Amir al-Mumineen Yazeed passed away on such a date…” So he called Yazeed ‘Amir al-Mumineen’ years after their rule and dominance. Had Yazeed not deserved this title according to Laith, he would merely say ‘Yazeed died’.”(Al Awaasim minal qawaasim 153 Darul kutubul ilmiyyah)

      It is also not authentically proven that Yazeed had any thing to do with the martyrdom of Husain (R.A)

      قال ابن الصلاح : ” لم يصح عندنا أنه أمر بقتله (الخلاصة في بيان رأي شيخ الإسلام ابن تيمية في الرافضة – ج 1 / ص 151 المكتبة الشاملة)

      Ibn Salaah (R.A) says: “It is not authentic according to us that (Yazeed) commanded that Husain (R.A) be martyred.” (Al Khulaasa fi bayaani rayi Sheikil Islaam Ibn Taymiyyah fir Rafidha 1/151 Al Maktabah as shamillah)

      The last words uttered by Yazeed were

      اللهم لا تؤاخذني بما لم احبه، ولم ارده، واحكم بيني و بين عبدالله بن زياد

      “Oh Allah do not take me to task for what I don’t like, and I didn’t intend (i.e. the martyrdom of Husain (R.A), and judge between me and Abdullah bin Ziyaad.”

      Thereafter he said

      أمنت بالله العظيم

      “I belief in Allah, the Glorious”
      And with this he passed away. (Al Bidaya wan nihayah 11/659 Markaz ul buhooth)

      This proves his death with Imaan.

      In view of the above mentioned narrations, the Ulama of Deoband have adopted a cautious view and refrained from condemning Yazeed. The general principle of Sharee’ah is to hold a good opinion about a fellow Muslim brother and also to invoke Allahs mercy for Muslims in general.

      And Allah knows best

      Wassalam

  • Faansaal January 3, 2010 at 10:28 pm #

    Assalaamu alaykum all brothers and sisters in Islam.What I see here is that without knowledge, people utter things which if they knew the consequences would surely repent either in this world or the next world.These historic facts have caused lots of damages to the real face of Islam which we donot know because we are not taught these historic facts in our studies. Which simply make us say o these are shias beliefs and we have nothing to do with them. Stop’ it has affected all of us.These things have started after the death of the Prophet (My Allah be Pleased with him and his progeny). I respect all sahabas but I revere the Ahle baite Rasool (Peace and Blessings of Allah be upon all of them) more than everyone as we have instructed by Allah and the Prophet to respect and love them and to attach with them in order to keep our faith on the right path. It’s very important to read the history. In the matter of Hadhrat Ali alaihissalaam he said:”Two kinds of people will be damned on my account .Those who form exaggerated opinion about me and those who under-estimate me because they hate me.” We, all sects need to ammend our ways if we claim to be the lovers of the Holy Prophet (Peace and Blessings of Allah be upon him and his Progeny). I am putting few books and websites which I request all Muslims from all sects should and must read for the understanding of what happened in the past. Imam Hussain alaihissalaam sacrificed his life so that this martydom will become an example for the Ummah to speak and to stand against the evil. He could have been complacent but he chose not to be. He didnot have any political desires or ambitions, for their positions are celeberated with Allah alone. We even donot know our respected Imams and their life stories.

    “Shiayat ka muqadam” a book by Hussain Al-ameeni (in which he quotes everything by the sunni scholars)
    http://www.al-islam.org/kaaba14/3.htm and go on to the 12th Imam by clicking the ext page.

    http://www.ezsoftech.com/stories/ahlulbayt.asp

    As far as Zakir is concerned he is also among the muslims who are driven by their nafs and then ego to undermine the Ahlul baite Rasooulullah (sallallau alaihi wa aalehi wassalam). I can’t say about the first 3 caliphs for Allah Knows the best and yet all of us including them are accountable on the day of Judgement. But from a single point of view I love and respect the Ahlulbait. And Zakir though he is excellent in comparative religions he should adhere to that and the fields that are unknown to him, should refrain from giving wrong ideas and fatwas which have nothing to do with Islam.

  • Azam January 5, 2010 at 12:57 pm #

    AoA
    Dr Zakir Nyek is on true path, he always true guileline to all muslims, Unfortunatly we have no knowledge baout Great Quran, therefore we are dividing in many sectarians. Finally we should say Yazeer (Rehmatullah Alleh) is correct. He was in 52 hijri as Ammeer-e-Haj and does nikah with Daughter of Abdullah Bin Jafer (Zainub’s Husband). Keeping in mind Hazrat Nayla (Wife of Hzt Usman RA) went to Mavia house for protection, Yazid khidmat as mother to Hzt Nayla, which means Yazeed have good moral character.

  • Rabiya January 6, 2010 at 6:58 am #

    Assalam waleakum,

    Brother Faansaal what u said its fully current,
    aaj ke zaamane mai hindu ku mussalman baanana churkar mussalman ko mussalman banane ki zarurath hai, bcz we are reaching very fast towards qayamath when we will die we dn’t no, we should show over face to Allah &he’s prophet muhammed (s w l)

    Allah tala hamea buzrugu ke sath mauth de. Ameen

    Un ke ghar bea ejaazath Jeebraail tashrif late nahi
    Khader karne walay hi jaane khaandane Ahle beiyat

    Jazakaallah

  • saif shaikh January 7, 2010 at 2:44 pm #

    salam to all ,
    i have some request & question to all my respected muslims
    1 ) the time has come when we have to decide who is superior & Aziz our Prophet ( PBUH) or those who are talking that ” dont ask help from Prophet because he died ( mazallah ), if yes then we must stop saying AJAN which contains phrase that MOHAMMAD ALLAH KE RASOOL HAI now we have to said that MOHAMMED ALLAH KE RASOOL THE ( Mazallah).

    ARE WE GOING TO SAY THIS

    PLs ANSWER

    • Faansaal January 9, 2010 at 5:56 pm #

      Wassalaam brother Saif,

      Please try to clear this misunderstanding of considering our beloved Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon him and his family) alive. He with the qazaa of our Almighty Allah had met with death at his appointed time. And there is never any contradition in this belief. He died of a natural death which every human being is supposed to taste, as Allah the very Creator of Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) States in the Holy Quran which no one of us disagree with and can never dare to. Only Hadhrat Esaa alaihissalaam was risen alive who too will go through the phase of death when he descends on the earth towards the end times of the world.

      Wassalaam.

  • Faansaal January 9, 2010 at 10:50 am #

    Wa Jazakallah khairun Sister Rabiya, Much awareness is required today in terms of our true, pure Deen. Aur Allah hum sab ko ashqaane Rasoolallah aur Ahlul bayt (May Allah be Pleased with all of them) banaae. Mujhey itna afsos hai ke kitney saalon tak mujhey apne un 12 Imam aur Ahlul bait ke barey mein kuch naheen pata tha. In logoan ke naamon ko hamarey Shia bhai behen ne zinda rakha hai. Aur mein samajhti thi ke yeh sirf un ke liye hain. Bus Allah meri jahaalat ko muaaf farmaey, Aamin.

    Sister Zeenat! before declaring shias mushrik, its better to first look into our own aqeeda where we lack important information. Buhut zaroori hai ke pehley hum apna qibla drust karein aur perhaiz karein ke musalmanon ko burey alqaab se naa pukarein aur apni taraf se ghalat fatwey na lagaain.

    Wassalaam.

  • Rabiya fatima January 10, 2010 at 7:00 am #

    Assalam waleakum,

    dear sister Faansaal i realy respect ur jazba towards islam Ashiqe rasool(s w l)& Ahle baith, meare liaye bhi dua kijiaye

    Allah tala saare mussalmanu ko neak aur ek banade.Ameen

    Keep in touch

    Khuda hafiz

  • Rasiq hasnain January 12, 2010 at 5:15 pm #

    Zakir nalayak par laanat ho, are jis ko mere aaqa ne jannati noujawan ke sardar kaha, kisko jannat ke phool kaha(siha sitta se sabit), unhe is yazeed palid ne 3 din tak bhuka pyasa mara, jiski mout kaabe ka gilaf jalate waqt huvi, jisne 3 din tak masjid-e-nabvi me azaan band karwai, jisne masjid-d-nabvi me khachar bandhe uske liye zakir nalayak dua karta hy, laanat ho tum per,…. aur zakir nalayak ke supporters per bhi laanat ho..

    Amount of knowledge a man posses is not importanata but how he uses it is most important,,,,,, even shaitan was posseseing vast ilm, firishtoun ku sikhane wala. lekin Nabi ki bargaah me gustakhi ka anjaam!!!!!

    Allah hame zakir nalayak ke fitne se mehfooz rakhe.. ameennnn

  • Hira Shah January 22, 2010 at 2:33 pm #

    After reading the above comments and fatwa of Zakir Naik we pray to Allah that Zakir Naik and his followers will reach the same fate as of Yazeed and in Qayamat they will accompany yazeed and his followers…

  • rehan February 5, 2010 at 8:03 am #

    Firstly Hazrat Hussain(R.A) was not a messenger of Allah as most of shias consider him to be in their talks. Secondly both Hazrat Hussain and Yazed were muslims so if ever there was a conflict between them was more to do with politics than religion. We should avoid commenting and giving personal opinions regarding such figures because we dont have knowlege about what had actually happened in the past. We should also consider that there have been forces trying to disunite muslims from the beginning and were successful in creating two major sects among muslim community. For surely Allah is All Knowing.

  • ahmad February 5, 2010 at 8:14 am #

    Quite right rehan.
    Has anyone thought why do shias do matam.
    The answer is simple, because they were themselves responsible for the martyrdom of hazrat Hussain(R.A) and they repent their act by doing matam.

  • Mohamed Farook February 14, 2010 at 6:04 pm #

    Dear Brothers

    Iman is incomplete without loving the Prophet and his progeny.. Even if one is out there converting millions to Islam, but if you mention oof.. about Imam hussein and the prophets Family, you are into Danger!

    Mind you deobandies, wahabis , najdis , tabligees. You are mainly out there to remove the love of the prophets family and Awliya from our heart. Your aim and maksad is to change peoples aqeedah and NOT to bring people to Islam… YOu cannot praise Allah by means of degrading his makhlooq especially the family of the prophet. Prophet clearly said that I am with war with those who are in war with my ahlul Bayt, with Hussein so the prophet is in war with the Yazeedes (i,e with zakir naik also) since Zakir naik loves Yazid ..

    No wonder we do not find any Walis in your dirty Aqeedas.

    You keep on gaining alot of knowledge and misinterpret the Quran and show us a modern dheen,

    We are followers of Ahle sunnah wal Jamaat and followers of Sheikh Abdulkader Jilaani.

    You people do not beleive in these pious people, the Ahlul Bayt and all those who Allah has favoured.

    Zakir Naik is bring christians to islam which is not bad but he is not a muslim Aalim so its better he keeps away from islamic topics. Its better for him and the Ummah…

    Wasallam.

    Mohamed Farook

  • Zulfiqar Khan March 21, 2010 at 6:38 am #

    All Dear Muslim Reader!!!

    In this modern age. new persons are coming to be Muslim. Why they are going to Muslim? It a quiestion which arrises in every mind. If a Muslim, think he can get himself answer, that there in no religion who give them good ways good laws, good love, good peace, good brother hood, good rights…. so they become a Muslim.

    When a person become a Muslim. Then he learn the ideology of Islam. When we recite the Holy Kalma. ( LA ILAH HA ILLALLAH HO MUHAMMAD UR RASOOL ALLAH). It means we follow all the messages of Prophet (PBUH). What he (PBUH) said. We should follow that one.
    And any person who did not know the actual educations of Islam, Qura, Hadith and Fiqah.
    How he can explain Islam. In this age a lot of peson who says that they are scholrs and preacher of Islam, they did not know actual thought of Islam and spreading irrelatead subjects and ideas, and lot of new minded and those Muslim who haven’t study of Islam. They are saying that this person saying truth.

    And the above matter which discussed above. It is belonging to Alhe Bait, and what are the saying of Holy Prophet about Alhe Bait. I think above one schlor did not study about those sayings. He shouldn’t any concern and study with Adiths. He should reconcern & restudy of Holy Prophet (PBUH) sayings. After that he himself readdress, rewrite and renew his above address.

    If he didnot review and renew his above address. He is not any concerning of Islam and he misguided the Muslim, who is saying that he is schlor or a preacher.
    Any person who did not have love with Allah, Rasool (PBUH) and Alhe Baith. He never become a Muslim.

    All the Muslims, i request them. If they feel any dout with any preacher or scholrs. They should conselt with Quran and Ahadith. INSHALLAH
    they will satisy……………………
    so Try more more and more study and relatin with Quran and Adith with ur keen intrest and love.

    God will give us right path.
    thanks.

    • Faansaal March 21, 2010 at 6:52 pm #

      Brother Zulfiqar Salaam,

      Very well said. Misinformation and ego lead to destruction, division, intolerance and injustices.

      May Allah Guide us to the right path. Aamin. Thum Aamin.

  • Ikrema Idrees March 22, 2010 at 8:00 am #

    As Salaamu Alaikum Dear Brother! I do believe that having Love for Ahle Baith is the part of our faith and without it our faith is not complete. But most of the Muslims show their love only by words and never trying to follow the Sunnah of Ahle Baith. We’re never bothered to know how simple the life of Ahle Baith(Aleihimussalaam) was and how pious, God fearing and humble they were. Hum sirf apni zubaan se muhabbat ka izhaar kar k aur Yazeed ko gali dey kar Jannat mein jana chahtey hein. Mein bhi Yazeed ko bohat hi bura maanta hun aur kabhi us k liye koi duaa wagheira merey munh se uss k liye nahi nikalti. Mujhey bhi acha nahi laga jub dr. Zakir ney uss key liye wohi dua ki jo hum Sahaaba Kiraam key liye kartey hein. Humein ye haq hasil hey k hum aik ghalat baat se ikhtilaaf karein chahey wo Dr. Zakir ney hi kiyun na ki ho.
    Leikin iss ka ye matlab bhi nahi hey k hum iss aik baat ki wajah se uss shakhs key sarey achey kaam bhool jaein aur uss key khilaaf propoganda shuru kar dein key ye shakhs tou kaafir hey iss ney Yazeed k liye duaa ki hey. Deikhna ye hey key humarey NABEE(peace and blessings be upon him) ney tou kabhi kisi kaafir aur munaafiq wagheira ko bhi gaali nahi di aur na hi humein Hukam diya k hum log Islaam k ya Ahle Baith ke dushmano ko gaali dein, iss se humarey DEEN ko tou koi faida nahi ho ga na hi ho sakta hey. DEEN ko faida unhi logon se ho ga jo is ko pheilaney mein din raat kaam kar rahey hein. Humein aisey logon ki khidmaat ko bhi yaad rakhna chahiye aur sirf aik ghalati par un key khilaaf nahi ho jana chahiyey. Aisa karney se Islaam dushmano ko mouqa miley ga aur wo humein nuqsaan pohanchaein gey.
    DEEN key muaamley mein ye dekhna humara faraz hey k jo kaam hum Sawaab kamaney k liye kar rahey hein, kya uss kaam par humarey Aaqa aur Moula Muhammad ur Rasool ul ALLAH (peace and blessings be upon him) ka Hukam mubarik hey ya nahi. agar hum apni taraf se hi DEEN mein izaafa kar k sawaab kamana chahtey hein tou kya iss ka matlab hey k NAOOZUBILLAH hum NABEE(Aleihissalaam) se zyada jantey hein k jiss kaam ka unhon ne hukam nahi diya hum apney Mulla k kehny par bey khouf kartey hein aur ALLAH se sawaab ki ummeed rakhtey hein. NABEE(Aleihissalaam) ne aisey kaam ko Bida’t qaraar diya hey, aap bida’t ke baarey mein NABEE(Aleihissalaam) ke farmaan parrh lein tou bohat behtar hey, Jazaak ALLAHU khairan.
    Ikrema Idrees.

    • Faansaal March 23, 2010 at 10:17 pm #

      Wa Alaikumus Salaam Ikrema bhaai, Allah aap ko aap ke neik khayalat ka ajr farmaey, Aamin. Zakir Naik ke Hadhrat Hussain alaihisSalaam ke muta’liq is baat se pehle mein khud bhi uski buhut izzat karti rahi hoon. Lekin yahan per jaisey aap ne farmaya ke “ghalati”, wo isko ghalati ke tor per naheen kehta balkey daanista ya’ni jaantey huey kehta hai kunkey yeh us ke aqeedey mein hai. Mein is per hairaan hoti hoon ke wo aur is school ke followers Imam Ghazali r.a ka hawaala detey rehtey hain, jabkey Hadhrat Muhammad (SAWAW) ke kaie famaan hain jis mein Imam Ali, Fatima, Hassan O Hussain se waabastaa hain (unke saath muhabat se pesh aaney, Imam Ali ke haamiyon, Imam Haasan O Imam Hussain se ziyadti ke muta’liq). Wo sab Zakir aur us jaisey aur logoan ko nazar naheen aatey aur ghair zaroori Imam Ghazali ke qol be atkey huey hain. Kon ziyada ahem hai. Zakir ko chahiyeh ke wo in mua’mlaat per dars na dey agar wo anna ki lapeit mein hai. Zaroori hai ke insaan koi bhi baat karney se pehley apna ilm wasee karey aur phir dars dey. Haan yeh hai ke Fatwey laganey mein hum sab ko buhut deehan se kaam lagana chahiyeh.

  • kashif khan March 22, 2010 at 8:42 am #

    TU ZINDA HAI WALLA
    TU ZINDA HAI WALLA
    MERE CHASH ME ALAM SE
    CHUP JANE WALE

  • syed khusroo pasha April 4, 2010 at 9:45 am #

    mustafa jaane rahmat ki ghulaami aur ahle bait ki ghulaami ka naam hi imaan hai,agar koi iss cheez se hat kar,yaane sarkaari ki ghulaami naa kare aur sirf iblis ki tarah sajde me sar maare to usko MULLAHIYAT KEHTE HAIN………………AL MADAD YAA RASOOLALLAH

  • syed khusroo pasha April 4, 2010 at 9:50 am #

    ITS SARKAAR KI GHULAAMI NOT SARKAARI KI GHULAAMI …….MAKE A CORRECTION………………………………………………..AL MADAD YA BANDA NAWAZ……………AL MADAD YA NOORALLAH

  • syed khusroo pasha April 4, 2010 at 9:52 am #

    “GAYA IBLEES TAZEEM E NABI KE NAA KARNE SE,HAZAROAN BARAS MULLA KI TARAH SAJDE ME SAR MAARA TO KYAA MAARA”

  • Tanvir Ahmed Qadri , MUmbai May 1, 2010 at 12:18 pm #

    The disgraced Zakir Naik has been blowing his own trumpet since a very Long Time , he gets Millions of petroDollars from the saudis and he himsewlf lives a lifestyle like that of an American , he , his staffs , his wife and children talk like the Jews and Christians in English does’nt he know the Language of the Quran is Arabic and the language of the Muslims in India is Urdu on a very very wide scale hence his justtification that English is the Language of the masses is totally false even the majority Indians , be it Hindus , Sikhs , Dalits speak languages other than English , only the Christians , the Hindu Elite and Parsis speak English in their day to day life .

    I myself has seen the Majority of his audience being non conversant in English still this Mad Crap looking Guy wants to speka only in English as that is the best Language he can speak . He cant speak even his mother tongue Konkani and Urdu which is a disgrace , does he wants to say that he wants to deliver Allahs word only to the English speaking people is that his justification , on my part i want to say that he is just out there to make money earleir he had only his fathers clinic in downtown Mumbai and his paternal house , but now he has several of his Luxurious Homes sprunged up all over Mumbai and Allahs where else , he has started an English School in Mumbai and its monthly Fees is nothing less than Rs.5000/- which is anytime more even for a well to do family this is ridiculous , this is not Islamic .

    What does he talkk of Yazeed and say Radi Allah Anhu . What knowledge he has of yazeed who was he , whose blood he had in his Body , Yazeed was the Son of Muawiyah , and Muawiyahs parents were Abu Sufyan and Hinda the same Hinda who had cut open the chest of the Uncle of Prophet Mohammed (saws) Hazrat Amir Hamzah ( RA) amd she chewed the Liver of hazrat Amir Hamzah (RA) , the Prophet (saws) disliked her and said several times to her not to come in front of HIM as she always reminded HIM of HIS noble Uncle Hazrat Amir Hamzah (RA) , yazeeds clan was clan of manipulators , they converted to Islam when they saw all doors were closed on them , they could not migrate anywhere because of their reputation plus they could not afford to Leave Mecca as it was commercially also very Important for the Arabs and specially Kuraishs nor they could live in Mecca being non-Muslim as several Muslims had hostilities towards them as thay had always prevented Muslims directly and indirectly from paractising Islam openly , Hence they accepted Islam which was a very very tactical move by the Banu Umayyads , to confer the title of RadiAllahu Anhu on yazeed is derogatory and also injustice to the Holy Prophets (saws) Grandson Imam Hussain (AS) , may our lives be sacrificed for this Imam and his progeny , HIS sacrifice was and will remain a matter Great Importance to the Muslim Ummah till the Morning of Qayamat , from his Sacrifice the Muslim Ummahs gets a lesson of Good and Evil , no matter how Pious a person is he will go astray if he keeps a Gradge against the Imam (as) , he is the fountain of Iman and Saviour of Islam at a time when yazeed had forsaken all Islamic Principles and Ideals .

  • SHAIKH BISMILLAH AHMED May 3, 2010 at 11:36 am #

    THESE WORDS IS FOR ZAKIR NAIK MEANS ZAHIL NALAYAK PLEASE STOP MISBEHAVING AGAINST AMBIYAYE KIRAM , AULIA E KIRAM,
    I THINK YOU DON’T KNOW RESPECT YOUR PARENT ALSO,
    THE BIG ABU ZAHAL AT THIS TIME ZAKIR NAIK

  • SHAIKH BISMILLAH AHMED May 3, 2010 at 11:41 am #

    SABSE TAALI (CLAP) IBLEES NE BAJAYA
    THA
    ZAKIR NAIK YOU ARE ALSO CLAPPING AND
    MAKING THE AUDIANCE TO CLAP ON MISBEHAVING WORDS.

  • SHAIKH BISMILLAH AHMED May 3, 2010 at 11:42 am #

    SABSE PEHLE TAALI (CLAP) IBLEES NE BAJAYA
    THA
    ZAKIR NAIK YOU ARE ALSO CLAPPING AND
    MAKING THE AUDIANCE TO CLAP ON MISBEHAVING WORDS.

  • SHAIKH BISMILLAH AHMED May 3, 2010 at 12:03 pm #

    TERI HARKATON SE TUJHKO TERE APNO
    TUJHKO TERE APPNO NE THUKRAYA HAI
    AB TOH SUDHARJA ZAKIR NAIK
    {DEOBAND , AHLEHADEES SAB EK KHET KI FASAL HAI}
    Dr. Zakir Naik is deviated – Ulama – e – Deoband
    Question: 9421 (India)

    Mera Naam Mohammad Ashraf hai, I am working as a software professional I want to know about Dr. Zakir Naik (Islamic Research Foundation ka Head). I know that he is fitna. But I want to show this fatwa to my friends and relatives.

    1. Dr. Zakir Naik ka Bayan sunanaa chaahiye ki nahi.

    2. Vo TV per aataa hai, TV ke baare me islaam kya kahataa hai.

    3. Vo Tie aur suit pahanataa hai, sariyat ne is libaas ke baare me kya kahaa hai.

    4. Vo khade hokar ulte haath se paani(water) peeta hai, is baare me sariyat kya kahti hai.

    5. Vo Dusare Dharam(Religion) se Islam ka muzakaraa(Comparison) kartaa hai, yaani dusare Dharam ko neecha dihkaataa hai, kya sariyat is cheez ki izaazat deti hai.

    6. Vo Aurato ( [Masturaat] [Ladees] ) ke beech me bhi bayaan kartaa hai, ye sariyat ki nazar me kaisi cheez hai.

    7. Vo Islam aur Sunnat per research (tahkeek) kar rahaa hai, kyaa iski izaazat hai.

    8. Usaki tasveer (photo) hamesha akhbaar(news paper), magzine me aati hai, Sariyat photo ke baare me kya kahti hai. Also I will tell you 1 truth, I know 1 person (Dr. Warsi) he has done PHD in Fiqua from Al-Azhar Egypt. He told me that once he attended Zakir Naik session, Dr. Warsi told me that his brother in law was IRF volunteer; he gave 1 cheat to Dr. Warsi and told him to ask the written question to Dr. Zakir Naik. Question was ?Gurugranth me Allah ka naam kha ayaa hai.? Dr. Warsi told I got scared that question was pre-prepared, then Dr. warsi asked the same question to Dr. Zakir naik and Dr. Warsi he himself answered (he read the line from Gurugranth publicly, as Allah also given him too much knowledge), after that he asked Dr. Zakir naik that I will ask you another Question that, Dr. Warsi Asked ?Gurugranth me Allah ka naam 2nd time khaa ayaa aur kyu ayaa.? After listing this question Dr. Zakir Naik get scared and told will meet later, Dr. Warsi again answered. Then He called Dr. Warsi to his office (in Mumbai) after meeting,Dr. Zakir Naik asked to whom you follow, Dr. warsi told I am mureed of Imam Ghazali. Dr. Zakir Naik told who is Imam Ghazali. Dr. warsi told him he is your father and left his office.

    9. I want to ask you he don?t follow Imam Ghazali, which maslak he is from.

    Please meraa jawaab(Answer) kitaab(book) ke hawaale ke saath dena. Meraa matalab hai ki jawaab ke baaju me hawaale kaa naam bhi likh denaa, mujhe public ko dikhana hai. Note: Agar iske alaawa bhi usake baare me kuch aur baat ho to aap log vo bhi likh denaa.

    Answer: 9421
    29 Dec, 2008
    (Fatwa: 2355/2128=D/1429)

    (1) The extracts quoted by the questioners about him indicate that he is having deviation; therefore one is most probably feared to fall in fitnah by listening his speeches.
    (2, 3, 4, 6, 8 ) These matters are against Shariah, even some of them are unlawful and haram.
    (5, 8 ) What do you mean by neecha dikhana? Please, clarify. Only the eligible ones are allowed to establish the truth of Islam and refute the false beliefs of others within Shariah limits.
    (9) We are not aware of his maslak.

    Allah (Subhana Wa Ta’ala) Knows Best

    • Ikrema Idrees May 25, 2010 at 7:35 am #

      Mr. Ashraf! Dr. Zakir Naik wo shakhs hey jis ney international plat form par NABI Alaihissalaam ki zaat par lagney waley aitrazaat ka jawab diya hey, Qur’an k khilaaf books likhney walon se munaazrey kiye hein aur tum iss baat par bhi tanqeed kartey ho, ALLAH ko kya jawab dou gey?
      Tum meri sirf aik baat ka jawab do, kya dr. Zakir Naik ney aaj tak Qur’an aur saheeh Hadeeth k ilaawa koi aur baat ki hey. tumhari baaton se lag raha hey k tum ney aaj tak kabhi uss ka bayan suna tak nahi hey aur tanqeed kar rahey ho uss shakhs par jis ko sun kar hazaaron loug Islaam qubool kar chukey hein.
      Tum ney jo sawaal kiye hein un ka jawab tou mein ALHUDU LILLAH dey sakta hun uss k liye kisi sey fatwa leiney ki bhi zaroorat nahi hey, bacho waley sawaal hein, jin ko koi 8th grade ka student bhi apni common sense se hi samajh sakta hey leikin tum ney apni taraf se bohat barrey sawaal kiye hein jin ka tum samajh rahey ho k shaayad koi jawab nahi hey. Dr. Zakir Naik se ye saarey sawaal bohat saal pehley poochey ja chukey hein aur un ka jawab wo hazaron baar dey chuka hey, problem ye hey k tumharey jeisey tang nazar loug kabhi uss ko suntey hi nahi hein, bus suni sunai baaton par yaqeen kar leitey hein. Tum aur tumharey firqa k log khud to Deen-e-Islam k liye kuch kar nahi saktey, aur jo loug kar rahey hein tum un ko bhi tanqeed kartey ho.

  • Ikrema Idrees May 3, 2010 at 10:16 pm #

    Mr Tanveer Ahmad Qadri! You are out of your mind, when did our Aaqaa and Moulaa MUHAMMAD (PEACE BE UPON HIM) stop or forbade us from learning and speaking a foreign language, infact He ordered us to have some people in the Ummah who could master other languages in order to be able to have dialagues with non muslims, conveying the true message of Islam. You are an ignorant person, Zakir Naik has been giving lectures in urdu as well and it’s been aired on peace tv urdu many times, but you won’t get to know because u don’t have the heart to listen to him and that is because you people are jealous of him, tum log khud to Islam k liye kuch kar nai saktey aur jo kar rahey hein un ko bila wajha criticise kartey ho sirf iss liye k wo tumhari tarah Qabron ko sajda nahi kartey, hey na? kabhi apney Na’at khwan larrko aur larrkiyon ko dekha hey tv par k wo kiss kism ka libaas pehan kar aatey hein, itna keemti, chamkeela bharrkeela aur parrhtey hein uss NABI ki Na’at jinhon ne tamaam umar kabhi qeemti libaas nahi pehna. yeh to bohat aasaam kaam hey Na’at parrh k lakhon kamaa leina, Deen ki asal khidmat to wo log kartey hein jinhon ne apni zindagi Aaqaa Alaihissalaam ki Ahadees-e-Mubaarika ko duniya tak pohanchya hey, kya tum ne kabhi suna k zakir naik ne apni taraf se koi baat ki ho. wo to humesha pehley MUHAMMAD (SAWW) ki Hadeeth parrhta hey phir apni baat karta hey

  • Faizan May 5, 2010 at 11:59 pm #

    Zakir naik is a kafir sent by americans to divide Islam in firkas. I pray to Allah to punish him in jahannum and in world as well ishallah.. And I m a strong sunni so no one can divert my mind but this is a good warning to our sunni brothers to stay safe…..

  • AZHAR ALI May 8, 2010 at 7:42 pm #

    who ever is the writer of this article HEAD OFF TO HIM.It a great article to bring the truth of munafik zakir naik.

  • Syed hussaini May 17, 2010 at 1:31 pm #

    Asslam Alaikum Wr. Wb.

    The Mercy of Allah is on Zakir Naik that is why he is at this stage, during many of his talks he said that earlier he cannot talk properly even he can not pronounced properly his name. It is the Mercy and blessing of Allah that he is now at this stage, he stop practising medical doctor and became doctor of soul

    May Allah Grant him Jannatul Firdaus – Ameen,
    Ya Allah make us to uderstand your Deen properly as taught by Prophet Mohammad (Sallallah hu Alaiwassalam).

  • abdullah October 29, 2010 at 6:24 am #

    slowly ‘naik’ is speaking actually his agenda now it is crystal clear what are his ideas and plans who believes the shabab al janna as rebel (maazallah) how we expect him to do dawa its all money game and israel and christian agenda may allah protect us from dis fitna

  • Abdul qavi December 3, 2010 at 10:21 pm #

    Well said brother.we sunni (barelvy) consider iman as loves toward our beloved prophet s.a.w.s. And his respected followers.
    As to naik (nalayak) preaching sunnah.
    I just need to draw the mind of our lambadas(followers of nalayak’s) one should know how to swim b4 he teaches one.
    What does nalayak preaches u. U knw wearing of imama,kurta,and scalf arund the head is sunnah does he wears
    he wears a imama,instead of the kurta he wears coat paint like a american,and neither he wears a scalf .
    So first he needs to be a follower of sunnah to preach it

    • anticrypts February 5, 2013 at 2:25 am #

      @ brother abdulqavi how do u know that you r rightfully wearing amama

      and anybody else is wrong , what book ever fell from the sky on

      your pirs please tell us the dress code according to the quran.

      If you look closely(which you probably wont) , the west is giving up on

      sufism, shism, taoism, maoism , and all other isms etc and wanting to

      strike a deal with true islam

  • M. Tufail Chaudhry January 5, 2011 at 2:20 pm #

    The religion (Deen-e-Islam) was surely completed by the last breathe of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH). We should therefore try to practice that only and shouldn’t involve ourselves into controversies of the events that happened thereafter. Allah is a fair judge for all of us and will punnish or reward us all on the day of the judgment for our acts in this world.. What we should therefore care for is, we are living our lives on the path as told by Allah Almighty through his messanger, Prophet Muahmmad (PBUH). I will not be asked by Allah about Yazeed or Hussain, what I will be asked for, is that how I lived my life? In the way of Allah or in vain without considering and following his orders of Do’s and Don’ts.

  • Mohsin Ali January 30, 2011 at 6:26 am #

    can any budy tell me that what happend after munazrah between Zakir Nike and shia ulamaa???
    i m waiting for this munazrah

  • Hashim Raza Hashim Raza March 5, 2011 at 10:17 am #

    Zakir naik is a kafir equal of Yazeed because Yazeed is kafir and naik his follower so boath are kafir.so i pray to ALLAH to punish him in jahannam and in world. i am a sunni no one can divert my mind but this is a good warning to sunni brothers and sisters to stay safe….

  • Yasir ali August 20, 2011 at 8:30 am #

    Sharam ate hai jab zakir nalaik ko suport karta main, manta ho k wo ek is scholor tha mgr kitab parny se koe ghada alim nahen banjata .HAZRAT MUHAMAD S A W aur AHLEBAIT ka jisko muhabat aur ahetram nahen us ke to ibadat bhe haram hai .agr jisko ye ghalat fahemi hai k sunni kuch nahen karty to dr tahirul qadiri k videos thekho k us m unony kis tarah naik jhoty bato ko prove kia hai

    • Ikrema September 10, 2011 at 1:31 pm #

      Mein bhi maanta hun keh Dr. Zakir sey bohat barri ghalati hui hey, ussey Yazeed paleed ko r.a nahi kehna chahiye tha. leikin uss ki iss aik ghalati sey humein Islam kay liye uss ki khidmaat ko nazar andaaz kar kay uss kay liye fazool zubaan nahi istimaal karni chahiye. uss kay iss view point sey yeh bilkul saabit nahi hota keh wo Ahlul Baith (Alaihimussalaam) sey bughz ya keena rakhta hey. Kafir uss ko sirf uss soorat mein bol saktey hein jub wo Humaarey Aaqa MUHAMMAD (SALLALLAHU Alahi wa Aalihee wa Sallim) ki kisi Hadeeth ko radd karey ya uss kay muqaaley mein apni baat aagey ley kar aaey. Hum ney to humeisha yehi deikha hey keh wo Qur’an aur Sahih Hadeeth key ilaawa koi baat apni taraf sey nahi karta. Keena to humarey dill mein hey keh aik insaan ki aik ghalati ki wajha sey uss ki tamaam achaaiyon ko bhool gaey hein aur uss kay khilaaf aik mahaaz khol diya hey aur uss ki asal wajha bhi hum sab jantey hein.

  • Hussein September 19, 2011 at 8:48 am #

    shiate ali in humul faizun,Khuda ni lanet yazeed par, And all yazeed supporters. YA HUSSEIN

  • abbas qadri September 19, 2011 at 3:55 pm #

    jin logon ne zakir naik ki himayet ma voot dia un logon ka hashar qiamat k din dr zakir naik k sath ho

  • rajkamal October 8, 2011 at 2:17 pm #

    KISSSS QADARRRR PAKKKE AQEEDE HAIN HER EK INSAAN K // YAUM E AASHOORAA ME DEKHA HAI KALEJA THAAM K // MIT NAHI SAKTE TIFARQE, WAQT K DAALE HUYE /// AAWO DOE DOE GHOONT PEE KAR SOYEN CHAADAR TAAN K ////

  • nazeer muhammad November 11, 2011 at 7:31 pm #

    nazeer muhammad 12/11/2011

    dr.zakir naik jese nalayak TIE wale jahil agar yazeed ki tareef karte hai to wo uske sath jahnnam k mustahiq hai.

  • Syed Meraj Kamal Ashraf November 13, 2011 at 9:01 am #

    Dr.zakir naik is the vital agent of one of the emerging fitna known as “Salfi or ahle Hadith” in fact they are not hle hadis but they are ahle khabbis. Comment of zakir naik on yazeed paleed cleard his notions. He wants to spread contridiction between peoples so that he could destroy the unity of muslims. he is getting the support of the youth by giving lectures against hinduism, christianism,and other religions. That is praiseable that he has gathered knowledge of different religions and using it angainst them. But the matter to ponder is that the ulma-e-batil which has been boycotted by us nd our ulma-e-salf are being brought up.
    Those who are praiser of yazeed i m having some questions from them.
    1. On whose command ibne ziyad and shimar fought the war of karbala?
    2. Imam Hussain (R.A) denyed to accept yazeed as Khalifa, it means according to you imam Hussain was a greedy person (ma’az Allah) who was in greed of Khilafat?
    3. In ahadeese mubarak Nabi (sallaho alayhe wasallim) confirmed that Imam Hussain is his beloved son.Now tell me that if a person can enter jannat who commanded to fight with beloved son of prophet (sallalaho alaihe wasallam).
    4. Before the war begun hazrat Imam Aali Maquam, Jannati mardo ke sardar Hazrat Hussain(radiallaho anho) had a meet with yazeed paleed if yazeed was not seeing that how army imam Hussain had with him? Is it fare to attack on 72 peoples with a huge army? Who gave permission to the soilders to attack on the Pious kafila of hazrat Hussain.
    5.Chalo Imam Hussain ko SHAHEED shimar ne kiya.Ho sakta hai ye yazeed ka hukm na ho. Par Hzrat ki SHADAT ke baad madina me ja kar yazeed ko khalifa qubul na karne walo ko qutl karne ka hukm kisne diya?
    6. Jinke nana ne hajra-e-aswad ko khana-e-kaba mein rakhne ke liye uthe jhagre ko khatm kiya, jinke baap ne ummat me khoonrezi ko dekh kar hazrat-e-Amire Muawiyah(radhiallaho anho) se sulah kar liya ho jinke bhai ne ummat me khrabi paida hone ke dar se hazrat-e-Amire Muawiyah(radhiallaho anho) ko khalifa maan liya ho, kya wo shaksiyat khilafat ke liye jang karegi? kabhi nai ! Imam Hussain ka Yazeedi fauj se jang karna is baat i dalil hai k iyazeed bad kirdar shaks tha. Ishq-e-ahle bait se jinka seena khali ho wo in aqli sawalon par ghour kare. Imam hussain ne jung isi liye kiya kyoki wo jante the ki khilafat ghalat hathon me hai isi liye unhone Yazeed se bait Qubul nai ki aur aise bad kirdar shaks ke haath par bait karne se achha zulmat ke khilaf ladr kar SHAHEED ho jana behtar smjha. Are khilafat logo ki dili razamandi se milti hai. Talwaar ke zoor par li nahi jati. Agaar yazeed adil tha to usne apni fauj se Hazrat-e-Hussain ka rasta kyo rukwaya. kya wo nai janta tha ki imam-e-Hussain ke saath wo paak daman Maayein bhi hai to yazeed ne Imam-e-Ala Waquaar par paani kyo band karwaya agar tum kehte ho ki pani band karne ki saajish ibne ziyad ki thi to ye batao ki ibne Ziyad ko waha par lashkar ke saathkisne bheja tha.
    Ho sakta hai ab tumhara ye sawal ho ki Agar Imame Hussain Haq par the to unke saath sirf 72 log kyo gye. Aur ziyada kyo nai gye? to is ka jawabye hai ki imam-e-Hussain waha yazeed se jang karne nahi gye the. Unhe Ahle kufa ne yazeed ke zulmon se tang akar bait ke liye bulaya tha. Wo waha ahle kufa ki taraf se yazeed ke zulmo sitam ke khilaf awaz uthane gye the magar Ahle kufa ne unhe dhoka de diya. Qasam Allah subhanahhukarim ki agar Imam Hussain jang ke kiye jate to sare ja nisare rasool unke saath hote, wo 6 mahine ke maasoom Ali Asghar ko leke na jate. Massom nanhi sakina ko leke na jate. Are agar tumhare baap ko koi bura bhala keh de to tumhe bardasht nai hota, yaha Rasool-e-Paak (sallalahoalayhewassalam) ka pura gulshan ujad raha hai,kisi ka shouhar SHAHEED to kisi ka bhai SHAHEED ho raha hai, tumhe kaise gawara ho raha hai ki ujadne wale ko jannati kahe. Aapni baat ho to haq qutl par bhi dushmani mol le lo aur jab nawasa-e-Rasool ke na haq qutl ki baat ayi to tum aul faul qwaneen o dalail pesh kar ke apni kam aqli dikha rahe ho…… hai re tumhari ghairat ki kalma usi nabi ka padhte ho aur usi ke gharane ke chiragho ko apni bato se (maaz Allah) laalchi aur jang aur khoon rezi pasand karne wala sabit karte ho.. Allah paak aqle salim bakshe aur har kisi se ziyada rasool-e-paak aur unke aal se muhabbat ki taufique bakshe. aur raha sawal is baat ka ki ulma ne yazeed ke mamle mein sukun ikhtiyar kiya, to is ki tahquiq aap phir se kar lijye, kyon ki tamam ulma ne aur aaimma ne yani iman Abu Hanifa imame Malik aurI mam shafai ne yazeed ke kafir hone par sukut ikhtiyaar kiya hai magar yazeed ke jhannami hone par sabhi ka ftwa hai aur imamAhmad bin hambal ke nazdeek yazeed kafir bhi hai. par choonki hum hanfi hai isi liye hum bhi isiliye yazeed paleed ko kafir to nai kehte magar uska jhannami hona haq samhte hai. mazeed jankari ke liye tarikh ki kitabo ka tafseel se mutalaa
    kare sirf chune chaate hue page-o ko na padhe aur har aalim ki kitabe padhe aur ishque zakir naik nikal kar ishque-rasool(sallal la ho alaihi wasallim) ko dil me jama kar padhe aur phir tahquiq kare. WAMA ALAINA ILLILBALAGH.

  • Ikrema Idrees November 15, 2011 at 7:41 pm #

    Mr. Mairaaj! At least I can’t accapt that You’re true Sayyad, from the language you’ve used for “Ahl-e-Hadeeth. By doing that, You’re not doing any harm to them or to Zakir Naik. As a mattar of fact, You’ve only exposing yourself, who and what you really are and how you’ve been brought up.
    I don’t have any sympathies for any Firqa, including Ahl-e-Hadeeth. But I’d like to ask you this one question, wonder if you could answer that precisely. “Kya yeh log Holy Qur’an aur Haddeth Shareef kay ilaawa koi baat kartey hein? “Kya yeh log humarey Aaaqa aur Moula MUHAMMAD (SALLALLAHU Alaihi wa Aalihee wa Sallim) ki Hadeeth Paak kay muqaabley mein kisi Imaam ki baat ko follow karney ka kehtey hein? “Kya in logo ney Deen mein koi aisi baat ijaad ki hey jis ka humarey aaqa (Alaihissalaam) ney hukam nahi diya hey? agar aap mujhey koi aik baat bhi bataa sako jo yeh log kartey hein aur Qur’an aur Sahih Hadeeth kay khilaaf hey to mein bhi aap ki tarah in ko ghalat samjhna shuru kar doon ga.
    Yazeed ko mein bhi paleed hi maanta hun aur la’anti bhi kehta hoon. Ahl-e-Baith sey Muhabbat ko Eemaan ka hissa samajhta hoon aur un sey bughz rakhney waley ko munaafiq. Zakir Naik ney uss ko “r.a” keh kar bohat barri ghalati ki hey. Leikin iss ka yeh matlab nahi hey keh uss ki iss aik ghalati ki wajha sey hum Islaam k liye uss ki baaqi sab khidmaat ko bhool jain. Yaad rakhna chahiye keh uss ney International Forum par humaarey Aaqa aur Moula MUHAMMAD (SALLALLAHU Alaihi wa’aalihi wa sallim) ki zaat mubaarik par uthney waley aitrazaat ka munh torr jawaab diya hey. uss ney NABI (Alaihissalaam) kay baarey mein non-muslims kay un sawaalon kay jawaab diye hein jin kay jawaab humarey Na’at Shareef parrh kar laakhon kamaaney waley moulvi aur Na’at khwan nahi dey saktey hein.
    Lagta hey aap Bareilvi Bhai zakir naik ki iss aik ghalati ko jawaaz banaa kar Ahl-e-Hadeeth logo kay khilaaf aik mahaaz kholna chahtey ho aur issi liye shaayad zakir naik par UK janey ki paabandi bhi lagwai hey. Yeh to koi tareeqa nahi hey, agar uss ki koi baat ghalat hey to uss ka jawaab deina chahiye na keh uss kay khilaaf na zeiba zubaan istimaal kee jaey aur us par paabandi lagwai jaey. Saboot sey saabit karo keh uss ney aaj tak koi aik bhi Deen-e-Islam ka massla Qur’an aur Sahih Hadeeth kay ilaawa kiya ho, phir mein bhi aap kay saath hoon.

    • Have Courage to know Truth --- A Sunni June 18, 2012 at 11:35 am #

      —————————

      Hadith Shareef – The Prophet (Sallallaahu Alaihi Wa Alehi Wasallam) is reported to have said – THE FIRST ARMY AMONGST ” MY FOLLOWERS WHO WILL INVADE CAESER’S CITY”
      WILL BE FORGIVEN THEIR SINS.

      SAhih Al BUKHARI

      BOOK of Jihad

      Vol4, BOOK 52, No. 175

      —————————–

      LIE – YAZEED was the leader of the Muslim ARMY which captured Constantinopole.

      Ibn Hajar – LOVING & GLORIFYING YAZEED IS NOT DONE EXCEPT BY A HERETIC WHO HAS VOID BELEIF, HIS LOVERS DESERVE TO BE FAITHLESS

      Ibn Hajar – Al – Emta bil al – Arbaeen, Page – 96

      Name of Constantinople is NOT FOUND in any of HADITH in whole Leitrature, but this was used by those who did sharah of Hadith.

      First ARMY which invade Caeser of Rome, was in 42 HIjri.

      Yazeed was forced to take part in the Battle which was 8th ARMY which Invade Caeser of Rome

      References:

      TAREEKH KAMIL- Imama Atheer

      Vol 3 Page 231 Events of 49 Hijri

      Tareekh Ibn Khaldoon

      Vol 3 Page 15

      Murujh al Dhahab – Imam Dhahabi

      Vol 3 Page 33

      Ibn Kathir’s

      Al Bidayah – Wa Nihayaha

      IBn Taymiyyah’s

      Yazeed ibn Muawiyaa, (Probably the name of Book)

      Page 30

    • Have Courage to know Truth --- A Sunni June 18, 2012 at 12:00 pm #

      Ikraam Sahab…Before telling some one his/her ancestral reality, I would suggest you to open up your own mind.

      The language He has used for the Pseudo Ahle Hadith People is absolutely understandable & beyond any doubt these people (Najdis/Pseudo Ahle Hadith/Deobandis) is a part of astray group.

      I wonder you are asking 1 single thing which they have added in the Islam which was not commanded by Allah Azzawajal & the Holy Prophet Muhammed Sallallaahu Alaihi Wa Alehi Wasallam.

      So the first question is, was depriving the mass from the Utmost Respect, Regard & Love for the Holy Prophet Muhammed Sallallaahu Alaihi Wa Alehi Wasallam was commanded by NauzuBillah the Holy Prophet Sallallaahu Alaihi Wa Alehi Wasallam.

      Majority of this Ummah i.e those who the know the reality of this cult among 112 crore -120 crore Sunnis & 16 crore Shias truly believe that indeed Ibn Abdul Wahhab Najdi (the leader of this group (Najdi/Ahle Hadith) in today’s world) is the one who was a Munafique & didn’t have true Love/regard & respect for the Holy Prophet Muhammed Sallallaahu Alaihi Wa Alehi Wasallam.

      And this can never be the misguidance with regard to this Ummah for reasons I provided below –

      The Beloved Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa Alehi wa sallam) said: “Allah will never allow my Ummah to unite upon misguidance and incorrect beliefs. Allah’s mercy, blessings and protection are with the largest group of Muslims. And he who deviates from this largest group of Muslims will be thrown into Hell.” (Tirmizi)

      Also, for your help that why the Majority of this Ummah believes that Ibn Abdul Wahhab Najdi & his doctrine left in the Muslim world by him is heretical & he himself is a Munafique, providing the below Hadith –

      Imam Bukhari (Radiallhu Anhu) quotes this Hadith from Abdullah ibn Umar (Radiallhu Anhu) that the Holy Prophet (Sallal Laahu Alaihi Wasallam) once prayed for Syria (Shaam) and Yemen. It is narrated that there were some people of Najd also present in the gathering and they requested the Prophet (Sallal Laahu Alaihi Wasallam) to make du’a for Najd also. The Holy Prophet (Sallal Laahu Alaihi Wasallam) continued saying: “O! Allah, Shower Blessings on Shaam and Yemen,” The people of Najd again requested the Prophet (Sallal Laahu Alaihi Wasallam) to offer prayers for Najd. The Prophet (Sallal Laahu Alaihi Wasallam) said: “It is a place of tremor and Fitna (Mischief) and the horn of Shaitaan will rise from there.” (Bukhari Shareef, Vol. ii, PP. 1050)

      It can be deduced from the above Hadith that Najd is neither blessed nor a good place but one of Fitna and Evil. Najd has been deprived of the prayers of the Holy Prophet (Sallal Laahu Alaihi Wasallam) and therefore Najd has the seal of misery and misfortune and hoping for any good from there is going against the Will of Allah.

      The Arabic word used in the above Hadith is Qarnush Shaitaan, which normally means the horn of Shaitaan. But the ‘Misbahul Lughaat’, a dictionary printed in Deoband has the following meaning: “One who follows the advice of Shaitaan.” (Misbahul Lughaat, pp/663). Thus we learn that a Najdi/Wahhabi group will emerge, as pointed out by Rasoolullah (Sallal Laahu Alaihi Wasallam) and this group will follow the advice of Shaitaan (Shaitaan refuses to respect Prophets and Saints, remember his refusal to bow to Hazrat Adam (Alayhi Salaam) is mentioned in the Quran. It will create havoc in the Muslim world. We are now witnessing the emergence of the Wahhabis who, with the assistance of petrodollars, are sweeping the Muslim world and are bribing them into accepting Wahhabism as the official version of Islam. Wahhabism is a disease but so many are misled into believing that it is curing the Ummah of Shirk, Kufr and Bidah. It is being portrayed as a revivalist movement. This is against the Ahadith. Looking at the geographical position of Najd, it lies to the East of Medina. The Prophet (Sallal Laahu Alaihi Wasallam) pointed towards the East and said:
      “There, that is the direction from where Fitna will emerge.”

  • Masood Ahmad Bhopali November 28, 2011 at 3:47 pm #

    Zakir naik is a kafir sent by americans to divide Islam in firkas. I pray to Allah to punish him in jahannum and in world as well ishallah.. And I m a strong sunni so no one can divert my mind but this is a good warning to our sunni brothers to stay safe…..

  • biblical dream meaning December 12, 2011 at 11:11 pm #

    Excellent goods from you, man. I’ve understand your stuff previous to and you are simply extremely magnificent. I really like what you have obtained right here, certainly like what you are saying and the way wherein you say it. You’re making it entertaining and you continue to take care of to stay it wise. I can’t wait to read much more from you. That is actually a great site.

  • syed muhammad hussain December 14, 2011 at 3:30 pm #

    zakir naik is a very big lair.

  • TAUSEEF RAZA KHAN January 25, 2012 at 5:37 am #

    zakir naik is a kafir naik he is the nasl of yazeed..
    so plz i appeal to all ahle sunnah walzamat to call kafir naik

  • syed muhammed ibrahim January 25, 2012 at 12:46 pm #

    akir naik is sab se bada lanati hai

  • firoz haider zaidi January 30, 2012 at 5:55 am #

    yazeed ko [r.a kahne wale khud harami hain unke ma ne zaroor zina kiya hai use apne ma se jakar pahle poochna chahie agar mere ayatullah nayak par qatl ka fatwa laga den to mai pahle amal ke koshish karonga magar hamre yahan ye chwanni wale fatwe nahi melte agar yazeed jannat me ja sakta hai to koi bhi dozakh me ja nahi sakta yazeed islam to kya insaniyat par gali hai or uska bap jisne sulah hudabia jo imam hasan a.s ke the wo tori

    • Ikrima Idrees February 2, 2012 at 7:31 am #

      Yazeed kay baarey mein meirey bhi yehi khyalaat hein jo tumhaarey hein, par tum ney jo zubaan aik aur Kalima go Muslim kay baarey mein use ki hey uss sey tumharey apney back ground kay baarey mein questions raise ho gaey hein. Removed

  • abbesw February 3, 2012 at 10:48 am #

    harami ki aulad ha zakir naik

  • Akhlak ali March 20, 2012 at 6:56 am #

    Dr.nayak i don,t know whatever U do it,s right or wrong but one thing is confirm that many people once again fall in bedat.

  • KHan April 26, 2012 at 10:29 am #

    OK YOU ALL FANS OF KAFIR NAYAK CELEBRATE NIGHT OF YAZID NAYAK STILL TIME FOR YOU TO SET RGHT AND RESCUE FROM DROWING INTO WELL OF HELL FIRE
    DONT BATTLE WITH HAQ YOU WILL BE DESTROYED YOUR AKHIRA

  • Ansari Noor md May 19, 2012 at 10:52 am #

    It is true”which say nayaik kafir” yazeed (r.a) and other respective sentens 4 yazeed.he is (K.N) Kafir after muslim.

  • facebook.com/umidarockstar May 21, 2012 at 7:19 am #

    Zakir naik i think have said sorry, but he is very wrong in certain things …….. He has no eishq e muhmaad…. May allah peace be upon him..,,,,,very wrong personlty……and a wahabi,,,,

  • Shadab khan June 27, 2012 at 9:55 am #

    I have read almost all the comments above and my comment is all those people who are against Dr. Zakir Naik.
    First thing I would suggest those people who are criticizeing Dr. Naik that First make ur self more capable to criticize any scholars.
    Yehan par zadatar log is liye zakir Naik key against hain aur vo keun hain vo khud nahi jaantey. Dr. Zakir Naik ka gunah keya hai vo khud nahi jaantey bas ek hawa chali hai key usey criticize karna hai. khud ka thikana nahi aur na apna khud ka amal or effort aisa hai key kisi ek non-muslim ko muslim bana sakey par ek chiz sikhi hai key dusrey ko kaisey gaaliyan deni hai.
    vo insan jiskey waza purey europe and western country mey logon mei islam ko jaaney ki chahat aayi hai aur hazaron log har saal islam kabool kar rahey hain, us insan ko ye shirkiya aur biddatiya akidey waley gaaliyan deney mei busy hain.
    Ye Ishq Rasool ki baat kartey hain par Jis ALLAH ka messanger ban kar Prophet Muhammad(pbuh) is duniya mei aaye uskey tauhid ki dhajjiyan uda rahey hain ye log.
    Inkey nazar mei Nabi ki Muhabbat ka matlab keya hai ye tou bas yehi log jaantey hain. Inki Nazar mei Nabi ki muhabbat ye hai key unkey kabron par sazdey karen, Unkey birthday par cake kaaten aur leg piece wali biryani khayen. inkey liye nabi ki muhabbat ye hai key khoob laal pili topi aur hara kala kurta pejama pahney, aur normal muslims ko jo becharey jaantey hi nahi K Quran aur Hadith mei keya dalil hai kis chiz ki, unhey gumrah kar key unkey yehan milad aur Quran khani karvayen aur usi bahaney khoob murga aur mutton dabayen aur is waja sey in logon key jitney bhi mulla molvi hain, unkey stomach itney bahar nikley hotey hain key pata nahi keya bhar rakha hai andar mein.

    Arey Musalmanon in sab mei nabi ki muhabbat nahi hoti, nabi ki tou asli Muhabbat ye hai key vo jis maksad sey aye they duniya mei us maksad par chalo, jo baatein unhon ne batayi hain un par amal karo, unki zindagi ko dekho aur samjho key key maksad the aur keya paigam deney aaye they hamarey Prophet Muhammed(pbuh).
    Prophet Muhammed sey pahley Jitney paigambar aaye sabka main maksad yehi that key jo insan key sazdey jahan tahan gair-Allah key saamney ho rahey hain unkey sazdon ko Allah ke liye kiya jaaye. Logon mei Tauwhid kaisey aaye ye saarey ambeya ekram ki dawat thi aur yehi maksad tha.
    Prophets ka asli Maksad logon ko Qabron par bula kar sazdey karna nahi tha, shab-e-barat mei haluye khana nahi tha. Khud ko musalman kah kar sina choura karney walo pahley islam ki asli dawat samjho aur kabron aur mazaron ki ibadat cghodo, chisti aur auliyaon ki ibadat cghodo, apney baap dadaon key banaye huy deen sey bahar niklo aur Allah key deet par aao, Tauheed ko samjho. apney akidon mei jiti biddaten ghusa rakhi hain unko door karo, jitney bhi shirkiya amal hain unsey touba karo, Quran ko halak sey nichey utar kar dil mei laao aur fir kisi dusrey par ungli uthao tab baat hogi.

    Gaaliyan dena bahut asan hai aur uskey liye koi paisey nahi lagtey par jis waja sey kisi ko gaaliyan de rahey ho uskey liye koi sahih Hadith tou laao, koi Quran key hawaley tou lao fir baat karenge Hadith aur Quran ki roushni mei.
    Shiaon ko gaaliyan keun detey ho, unho ney tou openly apney akidey ka izhaar kar diya hai aur Islam sey bahar khud ko karar de diya hai. shiaon sey hamei koi dar nahi par sabsey zada khatra tou hamie apno sey hai jo Islam ka lebas pahan kar hamarey andar aagaye hain par unki Ibadat Allah key liye nahi hai bal key kabron aur chistiyon key liye hain.

    • M NAWAZ November 26, 2013 at 8:15 am #

      naiak pehle tauba kare publickly and then apne aap ko Muslim banaye. Aoron ki fikr baad men.

  • imtiyaz June 30, 2012 at 8:31 am #

    Dear ALL Ahle Sunnat brothers,
    Asalam walya quam warehmatullah barkatahu,
    I am ahle sunnat, As all of us shouLd know we always speak of wahhabbis, ahle hadis, DEOBANDIS, ahmediya, zakir naik & many, many more WE SHOULD THINK OF SOURCE ORIGINATING THEM, ALL THESE SECTS, KAFIR LIKE ZAKIR NAIK & MANY MORE IN PAST, PRESENT, AND MAY BE IN FUTURE ARE ALL ORIGINATED, CULTIVATED, BREED, FINANCED, HELPED,SUPPORTED BY THE BIGGEST ENEMY OF ISLAM IT IS NONE OTHER THAN THE GOVERNMENT OF SAUDI ARABIA & MIDDLE EAST GOVERNMENT RIGHT FROM SAUDI TO DUBAI,THEY ARE THE SONS OF ABU JAHL, YAZID, FRAUNS, NEMRUD, IF YOU REFER THE HISTORY OF ISLAM YOU CAN SEE THAT SINCE THE BEGINING THIS BASTARDS ARE ALWAYS PLOTTING TO DAMAGE & DESTROY ISLAM, NOW THEY ARE SUPPORTING HELPING, FINANCING, PARTNERING, COLABORATING WITH ALL THE ENEMY OF ISLAM.THE VULGAR IMAGES OF RASULLALLAH SALLAAHU TALLA ALAHI WASALLUM IN EUROPE IS ORGANISED & UNDER PAID BY THIS BASTARDS SAUDIS (SONS OF ABU JAHL & MIDDLE EAAST GOVENRMENT). WHATEVER HAPPENING IN AFGHANISTAN, PAKISTAN, BOSNIA, IRAQ ARE ALL ORGANISED & FIANANCED,COLLABORATED BY THIS BASTARDS, THEY ARE USING ALL OTHER COUNTRIES BECAUSE THEY DONT WANT TO COME IN PICTURE, BUT ALL THIS CRIME & ATTROCITIES ARE ORGASNISED TO REVENGE WITH THE TRUE MUSLIMS. ONCE PAKISTAN WAS A MUSLIM COUNTRY IT WAS KNOWN AS A FORTRESS OF ISLAM SO THIS BASTARDS ABU JAHL (saudis& middle east government & their cititzens) decided to wipe it out from map, it was the greedy politicans & bureaucrats OF PAKISTAN who had sold this country to sons of abu jahl, fruans,yazids(saudis & middle east govenemnet today the entire politics, isi, military is controlled by this bastards najdis, as a result daily HUNDREDS OF SUNINIS, SHIAS ARE MURDERED, SHRINES ARE BOMBED,THIS FACT CAN BE READ & VIEWED FROM VARIOUS WEBSITES, ONE MORE THING I CANNOT UNDERSTAND WHY OUR MAULANAS ARE TRYING TO HIDE HISTORY & NOT ALLOWING IT TO REACH US, YOU KNOW IN PAST THE SAUDI & MIDDLE EAST WAS ALL FULL OCCUPIED & in habitated BY SUNNI MUSLIM BUT SOMEWHERE IN IN MID OF 18TH CENTURY,this bastard najdis saudis sons of abu jahl with the help of britsh governmnet had made shahid to all our brothers & sisters, THE LEVEL OF CRIME & ATTROCITIES SAUDIS HAD DONE TO MUSLIMS EVEN THE BITEREST ENEMY WILL NOT THINK OF DOING IT, YOU KNOW ITS A HISTORY ALL THE SUNNI MUSLIMS MENS,WOMENS, CHILDRES, WERE MADE SHAHID THEY WERE TORTURED TO DEATH, WOMENS, GRILS, OLD WOMENS OF GRAND MOTHER AGE RAPED, THEIR THROUGHOUT SAUDI ARABIA (PIG), THEIR DEAD BODIES WERE NOT ALLOWED TO BURIED, KABAH SHARIF WAS ATTACKED SEVERAL TIMES, ALL THE HAJ PILIGRIMS WERE ATTACKED AND KILLED MANY MANY TIMES, THE AREA OF HIJAZ, MEDINA WAS THE WORST MOST BADLY TORTURED AS IT HAS A CLOSE HISTORICAL LINKAGE WITH RASULLALLAH SALLALAHUTALLAALHEWASLLAM (P.B.U.H), ALL THOSE ANY DISTANCE RELATIONS/ LINKAGES/DOCUMENTS REALTED TO ISLAM & NABI WITH RASULLALLAH SALLALAHUAHLEWASALLAM & SAHABA IKRAM WERE TORUTRED & MADE SHAHID, THEIR DEAD BODIES WERE NOT ALLOWED TO BURIED,NOT ONLY NAJDIS BASTARDS HAD TEARED ALL PAGES OF THE QURAN AL KARIM FORM THEIR TEARED PAGES THEY MADE THEIR SHOES (NAUZUBILLAH ), ALL THE ISLAMIC ANCIENT SCRIPURES WERE BURNT & THROWN ON ROADS, ALL THE SUNNI MUFTI WERE BADLY HARRASSED & MADE SHAHID,ALL THE ISLAMIC COLLECTION & EVERY EVERTHING SHOWING THE,DEPECTING, THE GLORIUS PERIOD OF ISLAMIC ERA WAS FULLY DAMAGED,& DESTROYED SO THAT ALL THE WITNESSESS, PROOF OF ISLAMIC ERA DOESNOT REMIAN & BOMBED ALL THE ANCIENT REMARKABLE SHRINES, THEY ATTACKED KARBALA, THEY DEMOLISHED HAZRAT IMAM HASSAN & HUSSAIN TOMB, THEY HAD FIRED THE BOMB ON ROZE MUBARAK OF RASULLALLAH SALLALAHU TALLA ALLAHI WASSALAM (BUT BY THE GRACE OF ALLAH IT GOT MISFIRED, THE SON O ABU JAHL KING OF SAUDI OF THAT TIME DECLARED NO ONE SHOULD RESPECT RASULLALLAH SALLAHU TALLA ALHI WASALLAM ,IF ANY BODY FOUND DOING THAT WILL BE KILLED, IT IS A WELL KNOWN INCIDENT THAT THIS SON OF YAZID KING OF SAUDI ARABIA WANTED TO DEMOLISH THE ROZE MUBARAK SO HE CALLED A GRAND SUNNI MUFTI OF THAT TIME & ASKED HIM IN INSULTING & DISPRECTING THE RASULLALLAH SALLAHU TALLLA ALHE WASALLAM, THAT BASTARD NAJDI SON OF ABU JAHL & FRAUN & YAZID USED WORDS WHICH WHEN I AM THINKING OF I AM FEELING TO WEEP HE SAID YOUR MUHAMMAD IS DEAD IN HIS GRAVE & I WANT TO DESTROY THE ROZE MUBARAK OF NABI E QAYANT SALLAHU TALLA ALHI WASLLAM, BUT AS THEY WERE PLANNING SUDDENLY A MAUJIZA TOOK PLACE THEIR WAS A SEVERE STROM WHICH BLOWN EVERTHING, THE SON OF DEVIL ABU JAHL KING OF SAUDI HAD TO LEAVE THE PLACE,ALL THE TEARED PAGES OF QUARAN AL QARIM,SILAMIC SCRIPURRES WAS TAKEDN AWAY & NOBODY KNOWS WHERE IT WAS TAKE bY THIS STORM,DURING MUSLIM ERA UP TO MID OF EIGHTEENTH CENTURY KABAH SHARIF, MEDINA MUNAWARRA & SAUDI WAS PROTECTED FROM THIS KAFIR NAJDIS SONS OF ABU JAHL, YAzid, FRAUN BY THE OTTOMAN MUSLIM EMPIRE, BUT BY THE END OF 18TH ENTURY OTTOMANIAN EMPIRE LOST CONTROL & SINCE THEN THIS BASTARDS SAUDIS& MIDDLE EAST GOVENEMENT SONS OF ABU JAHL,YAZID, HAD FORCIBLY WITH THE HELP OF BRITISH HAD TAKEN THE CHARGE OF KABAH SHARIFF & MEDINA MUNAWWARA, INFACT WE ALL MUSLIM SHLOULD UNITE TO LIBERATE THE HOLY PLACE INFACT THE HOLY LAND FROM THIS BASTARDS YAZIDIS.IN FACT THE ISLAMIC REVOLUTION WILL ONLY START AFTER WIPING & FULLY TERMINATING THIS SAUDIS & MIDDLE EAST THIS SONS OF ABU JAHL & YAZID WE SHOULD THINK ON IT FOR A PERMANENT SOLUTION THEY ARE STILL KILLING OUR BORHTERS WE ARE WATCHING AS A SPECTATORS, WHATEVER I HAD STATED IS ONLY A VERY SMALL PART OF HISTORY OF CRIME & ATTROCITIES DONE TO MUSLIMS BY SAUDIS & MIDLLE EAST (COUNTRIES) , I WANT TO SHARE THIS WITH ALL MY SUNNI BORHTERS PLEASE GIVE THE EMAIL/WEBSITE ADDRESS SO THAT I CAN SEND THE INFORMATION.THIS SONS OF ABU JAHL, NAJDIS, SONS OF YAZID HAD ALREADY DONE A UNREPAIRALBLE DAMAGE TO ISLAM & MUSLIMS, THEY HAD FINISHED THE IRAQ , AFGHANISTAN BOSNIA, PAKISTAN, BEACAUSE ALL THIS COUNTIRES REFLECT GLORIOUS ISLAMIC PAST.PLEASE WAKEUP LEAVE YOUR GREED, SLEFISHNESS, UNITE & LET BITTEREST ENEMY OF ISLAM THIS MIDDLE EAST GOVENMENT SON OF NAJIDIS & YAZIDIS PAY A BIG PRICE.THINK BEFORE ITS TO LATE. AlSO FROM THE PAST IT TO BE UNDERSTAND THAT THE ENEMY IS STRONGLY USING WEAPON OF POLYTHEISM WITH THE INNOCENT MUSLIMS WHO DONOT HAVE EVEN BASIC KNOWLEDGE OF ISLAM THEY ARE BEING MISFEED AGAINST THE SUNNI ISLAM WAY OF PRACTICING, BUT THE INNOCENT MUSLIMS DONOT KNOW THE HISTORY & SICK INTENTION OF THIS YAZIDIS, NEMRUD & SONS OF ABU JAHL THAT HE IS THE HIDDEN ENEMY (AASTIN KA SANP) WHO HAS DISGUISED LIKE MUSLIM BUT HE IS THE KILLER OF HIS FOREFATHERS & HIS RELIGION.

  • gulam e alahazrat December 6, 2012 at 9:52 am #

    zakir ek **** hai uski hone wali nasle nesto nabud hogi wo 420 no. ka ****e

  • Khusroo December 19, 2012 at 7:42 pm #

    Dont ever trust zakir nayak in any islamic matter,because he dont know the arabic language even he didnt knw urdu,he says that only whch he gets translated in english,ask him to prove his name nayak from hadith and wat it means?

  • arshad raza January 3, 2013 at 10:51 am #

    you are very big enamy for ahle sunnat wl jmaat

  • respectbegetsrespect February 4, 2013 at 2:02 pm #

    The IRANIANS HATE ISLAM, ABU BAKR(ra), UMAR(ra)…. Why ??????

    Because the struggle to conquer persia(IRAN) began in the last few months of the prophet

    MUHAMMAD(saw) life, and later abubakr(ra) took the task and destroyed kuffar (non zakat

    payers) and began to get iran inside islamic rule , but later umar(ra) completed the task

    and made sure that iran was conquered , but the fire-worshippers were deeply humiliated.

    After all, through the ages they fought romans and byzantines and defeated them

    single-handedly , but their (iranian) triumphs were caused by the ferocious fighting

    capability of (todays) Pashtuns, while all of iran was exploiting (much like usa nowadays)

    huge pieces of earth and had a ”culture” of all the luxuries of life at that time (much like

    usa nowadays ).

    But then came the ”barbarian religion”(Nauzubillah) , Islam and all their dreams were

    shattered, many parsis(Nowadays billionaires in the poorest nation on the planet)

    migrated to india and settled there.

    Everybody from sufis says the prophet (SAW) provided pardon to the idol worshippers

    , But the question is did He(SAW) gave pardon to a single IDOL??????

    (answer is a big NOOOO)

    So after the prophet(SAW) left this world the remainder of idol worshippers from Arabia

    and the fire worshippers got together and imagined the injustice done to

    Hazrat Ali(ra) and his family (not a single one of the ahlulbayt are mentioned in the

    QURAN by name while ,pig(haram), abu lahb(cursed by the lord of the heavens and

    earth), riba(soood), rape (haram), gambling (haram), Alchol(haram) and many more ).

    so this supposed injustice done to ahlulbayt, gave them the right to abuse sahaba, angel

    jibriel even ALLAH(SWT) . . . . and the list further goes on till today, ”it” (the cursing)

    never ends;

    On the other hand jews complain about god and MOOSA(AS) not helping them against

    pharaoh,

    namrood etc so they also curse and ridiculed the prophet moosa(AS)

    prophet(SAW) and ALLAH(SWT) , they were the ones who invented the term

    SON OF GOD(The biggest falsehood and insult imaginable to ALLAH).

    The first copies of Quran that reached via iran were actually corrupted versions of

    BIBLES….. to this day christian missionaries say the quran is nauzobillah , corrupted

    version of the bible.

    so maybe iran,jews and still wannabe idol worshippers to this day are creating

    partners with ALLAH(SWT) and abusing everyone … but when we question the

    grave worship (of anyone) on logical and economic grounds we are said to be

    following a ”wrong interpretation of sharia”….. so your hash smoking and alcoholic,

    fire worshiping, devil worshiping ,ahlulbayt worshiping,idolatrous and most important

    money

    worshiping interpretation of sharia is supposed to be valid???

    truth is gentlemen every country with grave worship (or idol worship) has rich getting

    richer and poor getting poorer by the second and that is not progress….ask anyone.

    If the prophet (SAW) wanted power for his family (ahlulbayt) he would not have

    struggled for so long, he (SAW) would have taken the offer by kuffar in the beginning

    when they asked abu talib (ra) to stop the prophet (SAW),

    do u remember they offered highest position among the rulers of

    arabia but the prophet (SAW) wept, fearing the fury of ALLAH (SWT) ,and rejected

    their offer….. had he wanted power for his ahlulbayt he would have accepted the

    offer but once again the quran was not for some people to ”interpret”, it is for everyone

    to understand and follow.

    hope my words offended no one and if they did then i am deeply regretfull

    but the truth is not pretty.

    may ALLAH(SWT) help every brelvi,shia,ahmedi etc etc to understand the quran

  • mohammed hanif shaikh July 11, 2013 at 9:52 am #

    LAANAT HAI ZAKIR NAYAK PER. WOH EK NO. KA KAFIR HAI

  • Trackbacks/Pingbacks

    1. Muslims Protested against Zakir Naik’s arrival in Kishanganj, Bihar | Sunninews is now Sunnicity.com ! Spreading the Sunni Point of View - July 21, 2013

      […] Zakir Naik :Misinterpreting Ala Hazrat’s (R.A) Fatwa […]

    2. SUNNI WON THE MUNAZIRA AGAINST WAHABIS IN INDIA | Sunninews is now Sunnicity.com ! Spreading the Sunni Point of View - July 21, 2013

      […] Zakir Naik :Misinterpreting Ala Hazrat’s (R.A) Fatwa […]

    Leave a Reply

    Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

    WordPress.com Logo

    You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

    Twitter picture

    You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

    Facebook photo

    You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

    Google+ photo

    You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

    Connecting to %s

    Follow

    Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

    Join 2,840 other followers

    %d bloggers like this: